the Clinical Performance of a Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer Based Universal Adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) Compared to the Conventional Universal Adhesive (3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive)
NCT ID: NCT05029479
Last Updated: 2022-07-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-13
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Performance of Self-cured Universal Adhesive for Restoring Cervical Lesions in Geriatric Patients
NCT05054673
18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Carious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06946134
Comparison of Cyanoacrylate Adhesives to Sutures in the Palate After Connective Tissue Graft
NCT02935426
Clinical Performance of Bioceramic vs High Viscosity GIC for Cervical Restorations of Geriatric Patients
NCT05624008
Restoring Black Triangle With Bioclear Matrix Versus Celluloid Conventional Matrix Method
NCT04482790
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
P: Population: Geriatric patients with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) I: Intervention: Novel moisture resistant, M-TEG-P phosphate monomer based universal adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0) C: Comparator : 3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive O: Outcome:Clinical Performance using FDI criteria
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Yamakin TMR-Aquabond0
Novel Moisture Resistant, M-TEG-P Phosphate Monomer Based Universal Adhesive (YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0)
Bonding in NCCLs
bonding agent which can resist moisture and has shorter decalcifying and curing time
3m ESPE Single Bond Universal Adhesive
Conventional Universal Adhesive
Bonding in NCCLs
bonding agent which can resist moisture and has shorter decalcifying and curing time
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bonding in NCCLs
bonding agent which can resist moisture and has shorter decalcifying and curing time
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Geriatric patients from age 60 years and above.
3. Patients willing to commit to the whole period of the study.
4. Males \& Females included.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Cervical hypersensitivities
3. Underage patients
4. Allergies to components of the materials used
5. Infectious diseases
6. Mucosal diseases with unclear diagnosis
7. Inadequate oral hygiene
8. Bruxism
9. High caries activity
10. Non-vital pulp
11. Severe periodontal diseases
12. Severe dysgnathia/traumatic occlusion
13. Undergoing orthodontic treatments
14. Undergoing bleaching procedures
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hend Taha Hanafi Mahmoud
Resident in Conservative dentistry department , Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry , Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Li Y, Hu X, Xia Y, Ji Y, Ruan J, Weir MD, Lin X, Nie Z, Gu N, Masri R, Chang X, Xu HHK. Novel magnetic nanoparticle-containing adhesive with greater dentin bond strength and antibacterial and remineralizing capabilities. Dent Mater. 2018 Sep;34(9):1310-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
Wawrzynkiewicz A, Rozpedek-Kaminska W, Galita G, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B, Sokolowski J, Majsterek I. The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives-An In Vitro Study. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 31;21(11):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijms21113950.
Santis LR, Silva TM, Haddad BA, Goncalves LL, Goncalves SE. Influence of dentin thickness on intrapulpal temperature under simulated pulpal pressure during Nd:YAG laser irradiation. Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):161-167. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2098-1. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
Akarsu S, Karademir SA, Ertas E, Atasoy S. The effect of diode laser application on restoration of non carious cervical lesion: Clinical follow up. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Feb;23(2):165-171. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_399_19.
Peumans M, Politano G, Van Meerbeek B. Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. Int J Esthet Dent. 2020;15(1):16-42.
Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):800-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 6.
Ranjitha GR, Vikram R, Meena N, Vijayalakshmi L, Murthy CS. Clinical efficacy of universal adhesives for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial. J Conserv Dent. 2020 May-Jun;23(3):227-232. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_51_20. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation - clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations. Update and clinical examples. J Adhes Dent. 2010 Aug;12(4):259-72. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19262.
Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez IV, Fuentes S, Reis A, Munoz MA. Effect of dentin roughness on the adhesive performance in non-carious cervical lesions: A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2018 Feb;69:60-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
Milia E, Cumbo E, Cardoso RJ, Gallina G. Current dental adhesives systems. A narrative review. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(34):5542-52. doi: 10.2174/138161212803307491.
Sawlani K, Lawson NC, Burgess JO, Lemons JE, Kinderknecht KE, Givan DA, Ramp L. Factors influencing the progression of noncarious cervical lesions: A 5-year prospective clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 May;115(5):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.021. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
de Paris Matos T, Perdigao J, de Paula E, Coppla F, Hass V, Scheffer RF, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Five-year clinical evaluation of a universal adhesive: A randomized double-blind trial. Dent Mater. 2020 Nov;36(11):1474-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
Luque-Martinez IV, Perdigao J, Munoz MA, Sezinando A, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Effects of solvent evaporation time on immediate adhesive properties of universal adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2014 Oct;30(10):1126-35. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Novel YAMAKIN TMR-Aquabond0
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.