Impact of Microneedling on the Gingival Tissue Surrounding Implant Supported Fixed Restoration.
NCT ID: NCT07294287
Last Updated: 2025-12-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-05
2026-01-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Microneedling has recently been proposed as a simple and minimally invasive approach that stimulates local healing by inducing controlled micro-injury. It triggers angiogenesis and the release of intrinsic growth factors that promote soft tissue regeneration. Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) is an autologous platelet concentrate obtained through a single-step centrifugation technique. It contains a high concentration of platelet-derived and vascular growth factors that enhance tissue repair and collagen synthesis. Combining microneedling with AGF may therefore produce synergistic effects, improving the soft tissue phenotype and peri-implant mucosal stability.
The study will include 20 participants aged 18-34 years with thin gingival biotype (0.8-1 mm) around maxillary anterior implants. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
1. AGF group: AGF injection alone.
2. Microneedling + AGF group: Microneedling using sterile disposable lancets until pinpoint bleeding occurs, followed by AGF injection (0.2-0.3 mL per site).
Clinical parameters including gingival thickness (GT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing depth (PD), and bleeding index (BI) will be recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. All participants will receive standardized zirconia restorations following osseointegration. Statistical analysis will include intra- and inter-group comparisons, with significance set at p \< 0.05.
The study is expected to clarify whether combining microneedling with AGF enhances peri-implant soft tissue thickness more effectively than AGF alone. If successful, this combined minimally invasive approach may offer a practical and biologically based technique to improve soft tissue health and esthetics around dental implants.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Microneedling is based on creating controlled micro-perforations in the soft tissue surface using fine needles. These micro-injuries induce a natural wound healing cascade that includes platelet activation, release of endogenous growth factors, angiogenesis, and fibroblast stimulation. The process enhances collagen deposition and epithelial thickening, which may increase the overall gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width.
AGF is an autologous blood-derived product obtained by a standardized single-step centrifugation technique that separates platelet-rich fractions containing high levels of biologically active molecules such as PDGF, VEGF, and TGF-β. These factors promote tissue regeneration and accelerate wound healing. Injecting AGF into peri-implant mucosa provides a reservoir of growth factors that stimulate fibroblast activity, improve tissue vascularity, and enhance collagen formation.
The hypothesis of this trial is that combining microneedling with AGF will yield superior soft tissue enhancement compared to AGF alone.
Study Design
This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, parallel-arm interventional clinical trial. 20 sites for patients aged 18-34 years with thin gingival biotype (0.8-1mm) in the maxillary anterior region will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups using a computer-generated random sequence:
1. AGF Group: AGF injection only.
2. Microneedling + AGF Group: Microneedling using sterile disposable lancets until pinpoint bleeding occurs, immediately followed by AGF injection (0.2-0.3 mL per site).
Methodology
The study follows five sequential phases:
1. Pre-surgical Phase: Clinical and radiographic evaluation, oral hygiene instructions, baseline measurement of GT, KTW, PD, and BI.
2. Surgical Phase: Implant placement in the maxillary anterior region followed by 3-4 months of osseointegration.
3. Intervention Phase: Randomized treatment application after healing.
4. Restorative Phase: Fabrication and cementation of standardized zirconia crowns.
5. Follow-up Phase: Assessment of all parameters at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Outcome Measures
* Primary Outcome: Gingival thickness (GT) at baseline, 3, and 6 months.
* Secondary Outcomes: Keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing depth (PD), and bleeding index (BI).
Statistical Analysis Data will be analyzed using SPSS software (IBM). Paired and unpaired t-tests will compare intra- and inter-group differences. The significance level will be set at p \< 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
AGF alone. Microneedling combined with Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) Each participant receives only one type of intervention, and the outcomes are compared between groups.
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) Injection Only
Participants in this arm received autologous Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) injection alone into the peri-implant mucosa (0.2-0.3 mL per site) in the maxillary anterior region, without prior microneedling. The AGF was prepared from 10 mL of venous blood via a standardized single-step centrifugation procedure to obtain a growth factor-rich fraction. Gingival thickness and soft tissue parameters were evaluated using the same intraoral scanner and transgingival file method at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) Injection Only
Participants in this arm received autologous Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) injection alone into the peri-implant mucosa (0.2-0.3 mL per site) in the maxillary anterior region, without prior microneedling. The AGF was prepared from 10 mL of venous blood via a standardized single-step centrifugation procedure to obtain a growth factor-rich fraction. Gingival thickness and soft tissue parameters were evaluated using the same intraoral scanner and transgingival file method at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Microneedling Combined with Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF)
Participants in this arm received microneedling around the peri-implant mucosa in the maxillary anterior region using sterile disposable glucometer lancets under aseptic conditions. Repeated micro-perforations were created circumferentially until pinpoint bleeding appeared. Immediately afterward, autologous Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) was injected (0.2-0.3 mL per site) into the treated mucosa. AGF was prepared from 10 mL of venous blood using a single-step centrifugation protocol to isolate the growth factor-rich fraction. Gingival thickness and soft tissue parameters were assessed using an intraoral scanner combined with a transgingival file measurement technique at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Microneedling Combined with Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF)
Participants in this arm received microneedling around the peri-implant mucosa in the maxillary anterior region using sterile disposable glucometer lancets under aseptic conditions. Repeated micro-perforations were created circumferentially until pinpoint bleeding appeared. Immediately afterward, autologous Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) was injected (0.2-0.3 mL per site) into the treated mucosa. AGF was prepared from 10 mL of venous blood using a single-step centrifugation protocol to isolate the growth factor-rich fraction. Gingival thickness and soft tissue parameters were assessed using an intraoral scanner combined with a transgingival file measurement technique at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Microneedling Combined with Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF)
Participants in this arm received microneedling around the peri-implant mucosa in the maxillary anterior region using sterile disposable glucometer lancets under aseptic conditions. Repeated micro-perforations were created circumferentially until pinpoint bleeding appeared. Immediately afterward, autologous Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) was injected (0.2-0.3 mL per site) into the treated mucosa. AGF was prepared from 10 mL of venous blood using a single-step centrifugation protocol to isolate the growth factor-rich fraction. Gingival thickness and soft tissue parameters were assessed using an intraoral scanner combined with a transgingival file measurement technique at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) Injection Only
Participants in this arm received autologous Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) injection alone into the peri-implant mucosa (0.2-0.3 mL per site) in the maxillary anterior region, without prior microneedling. The AGF was prepared from 10 mL of venous blood via a standardized single-step centrifugation procedure to obtain a growth factor-rich fraction. Gingival thickness and soft tissue parameters were evaluated using the same intraoral scanner and transgingival file method at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Thin gingival biotype ( 0.8- 1mm GT at maxillary anterior teeth)
* Non-smokers
* Plaque index (PI) score 0-1
* No bleeding on probing
* No malocclusion or crowding affecting implant site
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous periodontal surgery at study sites
* Systemic diseases affecting healing
* Use of anticoagulants or drugs causing gingival enlargement
* Mucogingival stress or bruxism
18 Years
34 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tanta University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mona Al-Ahmady El-Meligy
Lecturer of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Oral Radiology Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Doaa M Elgendy, lecturer
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Lecturer of prosthodontics, faculty of dentistry, Tanta university, Egypt.
Shimaa M Eltantawy, lecturer
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lecturer of fixed prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt
Ahmed A Mosleh, lecturer
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Lecturer of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Toita T. [Uterine cervical cancer]. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 2002 Apr;62(5):198-201. Japanese.
Ozsagir ZB, Saglam E, Sen Yilmaz B, Choukroun J, Tunali M. Injectable platelet-rich fibrin and microneedling for gingival augmentation in thin periodontal phenotype: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Apr;47(4):489-499. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13247. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
#R-FP-10-24-3150
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id