Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft In Root Coverage of Gingival Recessions With Previously Restored Cervical Lesions

NCT ID: NCT03615092

Last Updated: 2018-08-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

17 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-30

Study Completion Date

2018-07-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with high standards of oral hygiene frequently search for buccal gingival recession (GR) treatment due to cervical wear, root sensitivity and compromising aesthetics. The cervical lesion (NCCL) is commonly produced by improper toothbrushing techniques, sharing the same etiology of GR. Many different surgical approaches have been described. The association of a graft to the coronally advanced flap had demonstrated the best long-term outcome for root coverage. But, substitutes for the autogenous graft must be studied. Therefore, the aim of this clinical trial was to investigate the effectiveness of the acellular dermal matrix graft (ADMG) in root coverage associated with a previous restored cervical lesion or not.

Material and methods: Seventeen individuals with bilateral GR were included in the study. At one side, the GR must present a previously restored cervical lesion, as the test group (TG). The contralateral arch, must present GR with an intact root surface (CG). All patients were treated with the extended flap technique associated with the ADMG. All clinical parameters were assessed at baseline and 6-months postoperative.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Controlled Split-mouth clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The clinical parameters were screened by one single examiner that was not aware of the procedures

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Test Group

Active Comparator: gingival recession with a previous restored cervical lesion

the aim of this study is to compare if the acellular dermal matrix graft is as efficient as a substitute for the connective graft used in root coverage of gingival recessions with non carious cervical lesions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Root coverage with extended flap technique and acelular dermal matrix

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

At one side, the root coverage have been done with a extended flap technique and acellular dermal matrix and there was no cervical lesion. At the other side, the same technique was performed, but the gingival recession was associated with a noncarious cervical lesion.

Control Group

the aim of this study is to compare if the acellular dermal matrix graft is as efficient as a substitute for the connective graft used in root coverage of gingival recessions with non carious cervical lesions. The control group had no cervical lesion, and was treated with the same technique as the acelular dermal matrix graft

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Root coverage with extended flap technique and acelular dermal matrix

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

At one side, the root coverage have been done with a extended flap technique and acellular dermal matrix and there was no cervical lesion. At the other side, the same technique was performed, but the gingival recession was associated with a noncarious cervical lesion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Root coverage with extended flap technique and acelular dermal matrix

At one side, the root coverage have been done with a extended flap technique and acellular dermal matrix and there was no cervical lesion. At the other side, the same technique was performed, but the gingival recession was associated with a noncarious cervical lesion.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* CEJ without significant damage;
* localized bilateral RT112 gingival recession ≥3 mm in the same arch, in which one had a non-carious cervical lesion (NCCL) restored with composite and the opposite one was intact

Exclusion Criteria

* previous periodontal surgical treatment on the involved sites;
* smokers
* pregnants or lactating
* compromised systemic health and contraindications for periodontal surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Arthur Belem Novaes Jr

Phd, Ms, DDs. Chairman of Periodontolgy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

School of Dentistry of Ribeirao Preto - University of Sao Paulo

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAAE: 0002.0.138.000.-11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02818855 COMPLETED PHASE4