Comparation Between Two Surgical Techniques With Acellular Dermal Matrix in Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT ID: NCT02774967
Last Updated: 2016-05-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-03-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to compare two surgical techniques for root coverage and evaluate which one provides better cosmetic results and less morbidity . 20 adults , nonsmoking patients , showing multiple bilateral gingival recessions , class I or II Miller located in canine, first and second premolars are selected. Both techniques use the ADM as a graft. However , in one Quadrant partial flap will be held together with relaxing incisions through an incision intrasucular , ADM will be positioned 1 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the flap will be positioned 1 mm coronal CEJ. In the opposite quadrant a minimally invasive technique periosteal envelope above does not use relaxing incisions , preserves the buds will be held , as well as avoiding any scars, the graft will be used to ADM. The clinical parameters (probing depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing index, height and width of the gingival retraction and height and thickness of keratinized gingiva) will be evaluated 2 weeks after the basic periodontal therapy and after 6 and 12 months to surgical procedures. In addition, measurements of photographic gingival recession with the aid of software will be performed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Comparison Between Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT01175720
Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions
NCT06006780
Two Different Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions With Porcine Collagen Matrix
NCT03619096
Acellular Dermal Matrix Allograft Versus Free Gingival Graft
NCT03251001
Mucoderm or Connective Tissue Graft for Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT03675334
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
extended flap technique
root coverage comparing two techniques The aim of this study was to compare and show the benefits of the extended flap technique compared to Tunnel technique both techniques using the acellular dermal matrix for root coverage.
Other Names:
acellular dermal matrix extended flap technique
root coverage
Root coverage with acellular dermal matrix using two techniques: advanced positional flap ou tunneling,
tunnel technique
root coverage comparing two techniques The aim of this study was to compare and show the benefits of the extended flap technique compared to Tunnel technique both techniques using the acellular dermal matrix for root coverage.
Other Names:
acellular dermal matrix extended flap technique
root coverage
Root coverage with acellular dermal matrix using two techniques: advanced positional flap ou tunneling,
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
root coverage
Root coverage with acellular dermal matrix using two techniques: advanced positional flap ou tunneling,
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sao Paulo
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arthur Belem Novaes Jr
professor of periodontics department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
arthur b novaes jr, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
FORP-USP
gabriel f bastos, MSD Student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
FORP-USP
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Gabriel F Bastos
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
35907314.8.0000.5419
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.