Comparation Between Two Surgical Techniques With Acellular Dermal Matrix in Treatment of Gingival Recessions

NCT ID: NCT02774967

Last Updated: 2016-05-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The gold standard for the treatment of gingival recession, is the coronal repositioning of the flap associated with the subepithelial connective tissue graft. The acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been used as a substitute a subepithelial connective tissue graft in periodontal plastic surgery and mucogengivais, and has achieved similar results. The use of ADM has the advantage of avoiding possible pre and postoperative complications, as well as overcome the limitations presented by autograft. The different surgical techniques used for root coverage seek predictability and success. For this, besides the type of incision placements flap and graft are of utmost importance because the healing benefit and outcome.

The aim of this study is to compare two surgical techniques for root coverage and evaluate which one provides better cosmetic results and less morbidity . 20 adults , nonsmoking patients , showing multiple bilateral gingival recessions , class I or II Miller located in canine, first and second premolars are selected. Both techniques use the ADM as a graft. However , in one Quadrant partial flap will be held together with relaxing incisions through an incision intrasucular , ADM will be positioned 1 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the flap will be positioned 1 mm coronal CEJ. In the opposite quadrant a minimally invasive technique periosteal envelope above does not use relaxing incisions , preserves the buds will be held , as well as avoiding any scars, the graft will be used to ADM. The clinical parameters (probing depth, clinical attachment level, bleeding on probing index, height and width of the gingival retraction and height and thickness of keratinized gingiva) will be evaluated 2 weeks after the basic periodontal therapy and after 6 and 12 months to surgical procedures. In addition, measurements of photographic gingival recession with the aid of software will be performed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession Gingival Diseases Mouth Diseases Periodontal Atrophy Periodontal Diseases Stomatognathic Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

extended flap technique

root coverage comparing two techniques The aim of this study was to compare and show the benefits of the extended flap technique compared to Tunnel technique both techniques using the acellular dermal matrix for root coverage.

Other Names:

acellular dermal matrix extended flap technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

root coverage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root coverage with acellular dermal matrix using two techniques: advanced positional flap ou tunneling,

tunnel technique

root coverage comparing two techniques The aim of this study was to compare and show the benefits of the extended flap technique compared to Tunnel technique both techniques using the acellular dermal matrix for root coverage.

Other Names:

acellular dermal matrix extended flap technique

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

root coverage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root coverage with acellular dermal matrix using two techniques: advanced positional flap ou tunneling,

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

root coverage

Root coverage with acellular dermal matrix using two techniques: advanced positional flap ou tunneling,

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

ages 18 to 50 years old bilateral multiple gingival recession type Miller class I or II with at least one tooth with 3 mm in height and less than 3mm of keratinized tissue in canine and pre-molar teeth

Exclusion Criteria

diabetics pregnant women chronic use of medication periodontitis smokings
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Arthur Belem Novaes Jr

professor of periodontics department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

arthur b novaes jr, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

FORP-USP

gabriel f bastos, MSD Student

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

FORP-USP

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gabriel F Bastos

Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

35907314.8.0000.5419

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02818855 COMPLETED PHASE4