Comparison of Two Flaps for Root Coverage

NCT ID: NCT02814279

Last Updated: 2020-05-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to compare clinical, esthetic and patient-centered outcomes of coronally advanced tunnel (TUN) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) both associated with connective tissue graft (CTG) in the treatment of gingival recession.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, parallel and controlled clinical trial. The population evaluated in the study was selected at Institute of Science and Technology (ICT), São José dos Campos, College of Dentistry.

Patients were assigned to one of the three treatment groups:

* Group TUN+CTG (21): Periodontal surgery for root coverage through tunnel flap technique plus connective tissue graft.
* Group CAF+CTG (21): Periodontal surgery for root coverage through trapezoidal flap plus connective tissue graft.

All surgical procedures were performed by a single operator (MPS). The gingival recession defects were randomly treated by either the trapezoidal-type of coronally advanced flap plus connective tissue graft (CAF+CTG) or the coronally advanced tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft (TUN+CTG). In brief description, CAF treatment was performed by starting with two divergent releasing incisions lateral to the recessed area. A sulcular incision was made to unite the releasing incisions and the flap was raised beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ) in split-full-split thickness. The connective tissue graft was removed from the palate and sutured in position. Sling sutures were placed to stabilize the flap in a coronal position 2 mm above the cement-enamel junction (CEJ), followed by interrupted sutures to close the releasing incisions. The tunnel flap was performed with initial sulcular incisions, spit thickness flap was prepared using specific tunneling knives beyond the mucogingival junction and until flap gain mobility. The flap was laterally extended to adjacent papillae that were carefully detached by means of a full-thickness preparation. The connective tissue graft was insert into the tunnel. Sling sutures were performed involving the flap and graft to coronally cover 2 mm above the CEJ. After the surgery, the participants were requested to take 500 mg of sodium dipyrone every 4 hours for 3 days in case of pain, and to avoid brushing and flossing in the treated area for a period of 2 weeks. During this period, plaque control was performed using 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse used twice a day. The sutures were removed after 7 days, and all of the patients were recalled for prophylaxis and reinforcement of motivation and instruction for atraumatic tooth brushing during the study period.

Clinical, esthetics, and comfort of patients parameters were assessed at 45 days, 2, 3 and 6 months after the procedure.

Quantitative data were recorded as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and normality was tested using Shapiro-Wilk tests. The probing depth (PD), relative gingival recession (RGR), clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue thickness (KTT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), and dentin hypersensitivity (DH) values were examined by two-way repeated measures ANOVA to evaluate the differences within and between groups, followed by a Tukey test for multiple comparisons when the Shapiro-Wilk p value was ≥ 0.05. Those presenting Shapiro-Wilk p values \< 0.05 were analyzed using a Friedman test (for intragroup comparisons) and Mann-Whitney tests (for intergroup comparisons). Patients' esthetics and discomfort measures using visual analog scale (VAS) were analyzed by T-tests. The frequency of complete root coverage was compared using χ2 tests. Intergroup root coverage esthetic score (RES) comparisons were performed with a T-test. A significance level of 0.05 was adopted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CAF plus connective tissue graft

CAF treatment was performed by starting with two divergent releasing incisions lateral to the recessed area. A sulcular incision was made to unite the releasing incisions and the flap was raised beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ) in split-full-split thickness. The connective tissue graft was removed from the palate according to Bruno technique (1994) and sutured in position. Sling sutures were placed to stabilize the flap in a coronal position 2 mm above the CEJ, followed by interrupted sutures to close the releasing incisions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CAF plus connective tissue graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Periodontal surgery for root coverage by the trapezoidal flap associated with connective tissue graft.

Sodium dipyrone

Intervention Type DRUG

All participants were instructed to take 500 mg sodium dipyrone just in case of pain.

chlorhexidine rinse

Intervention Type DRUG

All participants were instructed to perform 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse after the surgical procedures.

Tunnel plus connective tissue graft

The tunnel flap was performed according to Zuhr et al., 2007. Following initial sulcular incisions, spit thickness flap was prepared using specific tunneling knives beyond the mucogingival junction and until flap gain mobility. The flap was laterally extended to adjacent papillae that were carefully detached by means of a full-thickness preparation. The connective tissue graft was insert into the tunnel. Sling sutures were performed involving the flap and graft to coronally cover 2 mm above the CEJ.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tunnel plus connective tissue graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Periodontal surgery for root coverage by the tunnel flap associated with connective tissue graft.

Sodium dipyrone

Intervention Type DRUG

All participants were instructed to take 500 mg sodium dipyrone just in case of pain.

chlorhexidine rinse

Intervention Type DRUG

All participants were instructed to perform 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse after the surgical procedures.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CAF plus connective tissue graft

Periodontal surgery for root coverage by the trapezoidal flap associated with connective tissue graft.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tunnel plus connective tissue graft

Periodontal surgery for root coverage by the tunnel flap associated with connective tissue graft.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sodium dipyrone

All participants were instructed to take 500 mg sodium dipyrone just in case of pain.

Intervention Type DRUG

chlorhexidine rinse

All participants were instructed to perform 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse after the surgical procedures.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Periodontal plastic surgery Periodontal plastic surgery Drug prescription Drug prescription

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients presenting Miller class I or II gingival recession in the maxillary canines or premolars
* Visible cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) with pulp vitality;
* Patients presenting no signs of active periodontal disease and full-mouth plaque and bleeding score ≤20%;
* Patients older than 18 years old; probing depth ˂3 mm in the included teeth;
* Patients who agreed to participate and signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients presenting systemic problems that would contraindicate the surgical procedure;
* Patients taking medications known to interfere with the wound healing process or that contraindicate the surgical procedure;
* Smokers or pregnant women;
* Patients who underwent periodontal surgery in the area of interest;
* Patients with orthodontic therapy in progress.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mauro Pedrine Santamaria

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mauro P Santamaria, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ICT-UNESP

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

de Sanctis M, Zucchelli G. Coronally advanced flap: a modified surgical approach for isolated recession-type defects: three-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Mar;34(3):262-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01039.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17309597 (View on PubMed)

Zuhr O, Fickl S, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Hurzeler MB. Covering of gingival recessions with a modified microsurgical tunnel technique: case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007 Oct;27(5):457-63.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17990442 (View on PubMed)

Bruno JF. Connective tissue graft technique assuring wide root coverage. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994 Apr;14(2):126-37.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7928129 (View on PubMed)

Santamaria MP, Neves FLDS, Silveira CA, Mathias IF, Fernandes-Dias SB, Jardini MAN, Tatakis DN. Connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal flap for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 May;44(5):540-547. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12714. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28231619 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UEPJMF 3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02818855 COMPLETED PHASE4