Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Connective Tissue Grafts Obtained With Two Different Methods in Root Coverage

NCT ID: NCT06373783

Last Updated: 2024-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-15

Study Completion Date

2024-03-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gingival recession is a clinical problem that increases with age and affects patient comfort. It is defined as the displacement of the gingival margin to a more apical position of the cementum-enamel border of the tooth.

Coronally advanced flap (CAF) or tunnel technique (TUN) with subepithelial connective tissue procedures have been reported to be the most predictable methods of single gingival recession treatments. The ultimate goal of these plastic periodontal surgical procedures is to close the exposed root surface and achieve optimum aesthetic results. The main indications for root coverage (RC) procedures are aesthetic concern, root hypersensitivity, prevention of cervical abrasion and root caries, improvement of restorative results, and facilitation of plaque control. The use of a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCGT) combined with a coronally positioned flap is considered the gold standard by many authors for single gingival recession treatments.

De-epithelialization of free gingival grafts (DGG) has been proposed, especially when palatal tissue thickness is insufficient (≤2.5 mm) and larger graft size in the apico-coronal or mesio-distal directions is required. In this technique, the graft of the required width and length is separated from the lateral side of the palate, and then the 0.3-0.5 mm thick epithelial layer of the resulting graft is cut from the connective tissue layer.

Ultrasonography (USG) is based on the principle of recording data obtained as a result of ultrasound waves sent with the help of a probe hitting and reflecting on substances of different densities. This technique is widely used in medical practice. In dentistry, the USG method is used to measure the alveolar bone level and the dimensions of the periodontium to evaluate the gingival thickness. It also has functions to evaluate color power and color speed, as well as blood flow.

The study hypothesizes that combining SCGT and DGG with a coronally positioned flap could yield different clinical outcomes in patients with a single buccal gingival recession. This study aims to compare the clinical success of connective tissue grafts obtained by two different surgical methods in covering the root surface with ultrasonography (USG).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study was planned as a randomized controlled study. Patients with single Miller class 1 or 2 gingival recession who need root coverage surgery in the Department of Periodontology were included in the study. In combination with Zuchelli's coronally positioned flap technique, gingival recession in the upper jaw premolar region was treated using a de-epithelialized gingival graft or a subepithelial gingival graft. The subepithelial connective tissue graft was obtained in each patient using the single incision technique from the region between the mesial of the canine and the mesial of the first molar in the palate. Connective tissue dimensions were approximately 10 X 5 X 2 mm. Finally, the incision line was sutured with 5/0 synthetic, nonabsorbable, sterile monofilament suture. The de-epithelized gingival graft was taken in a rectangular shape from the area located on the palatal side of the maxillary canine and the first molar tooth, and then it was de-epithelized with the help of a scalpel. After the graft was stabilized to the recipient area with a 5-0 resorbable, sterile monofilament suture. The flap was repositioned and sutured with 5/0 synthetic, nonabsorbable, sterile monofilament suture.

Clinical measurements (probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession depth and width, keratinized tissue width and height) were taken on the day of surgery, the 3rd days, the 14th days, the 1st month, the 3rd months and the 6th months.

Patients were evaluated using an ultrasonography device ( MyLabtm Seven, Esaote, Genoa, Italy) at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology.

USG measurements were performed on days 0, 3, 14, 30, 90, and 180 for buccal tissue thickness and tissue vascularization by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist with at least six years of experience. A 6-8 MHZ intraoral probe was used in intraoral USG examinations. Steril gel was applied to the intraoral probe and covered with stretch film. Then, it was placed directly on the buccal mucosal surface. Mucosal thickness was evaluated using the B-mode of the device, and vascularization was evaluated using the color Doppler and pulsed wave Doppler modes of the device. mean pulsatility index (PI) values of each patient were calculated and considered for statistical analysis.

The power analysis of the study was performed for sample size calculation. In the power analysis, when α = 0.05, β = 0.40, 1-β: 0.80, the number of regions to be included in the study was determined as 20 for each group. The sample size was calculated with a statistical program.

The data obtained from the study is the 22. version of SPSS. (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) descriptive analysis, means and standard deviations were calculated for all clinical effects, and USG measurements. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used for intragroup comparisons before and after treatment. The normality of data distributions of the groups was measured with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. In the comparison of groups, an independent groups t-test was used if the data distributions were normal, and Mann Whitney U test was used if the data distribution was not normal. The significance value was taken as p\<00.5.m (G\*Power; Universitat, Dusseldorf, Germany).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession, Localized

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

de-epithelise

In combination with Zuchelli's coronally positioned flap technique, gingival recession in the upper jaw premolar region was treated using a de-epithelialized gingival graft. The gingival graft was taken in a rectangular shape from the area located on the palatal side of the maxillary canine and the first molar tooth, and then it was de-epithelised with the help of a scalpel.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

de- epithelize gingival graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The area where the gingival recession occurred was prepared with the modified coronally positioned flap technique developed by Zuchelli. A shallow horizontal incision was made at ≈3 mm apical from the gingival margin of the maxillary molar teeth using a number 15 scalpel blade. Subsequently, a parallel horizontal incision, at ≈ 4 mm apical from the first horizontal incision, was traced in conjunction with two vertical releasing incisions to delineate a rectangular area. Then, the uppermost epithelial layer was scraped off using a size 11 scalpel tip. The connective tissue graft to be taken from the palate area was 10x5x2 mm in size, and the graft thickness was measured with an endodontic spreader from 3 points (mesial, buccal, and distal) and electronic caliper during surgery.

ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Clinical parameter measurements (probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession depth and width, keratinized tissue width and height) were taken on the day of surgery, the 3rd days, the 14th days, the 1st month, the 3rd months and the 6th months.

Ultrasonography measurements A 6-18 MHz intraoral probe was used in intraoral USG examinations. Sterile gel was applied to the intraoral probe and covered with a stretch film. Then, it was placed directly on the mucosal surface of the receiver site in the buccal area. Mucosal thickness was evaluated using the B-mode of the device, and vascularization was evaluated using the color doppler and pulsed wave doppler modes of the device. The following equation is used and calculated by US unit pulsatility index (PI) = (Vmax-Vmin) (Vmean) (Vmax is peak systolic flow velocity. Vmin is diastolic flow velocity and Vmean is mean flow velocity.) The mean PI values of each patient were measured.

subepithelial

In combination with Zuchelli's coronally positioned flap technique, gingival recession in the upper jaw premolar region was treated using a subepithelial gingival graft. Connective tissue taken from the upper jaw-palate region with a single incision technique was used.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

subepithelial connective tissue graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The area where the gingival recession occurred was prepared with the modified coronally positioned flap technique developed by Zuchelli. The subepithelial connective tissue graft was obtained in each patient using the single incision technique from the region between the mesial of the canine and the mesial of the first molar in the palate. Connective tissue dimensions were approximately 10x5x2 mm. The graft thickness was measured with an endodontic spreader from 3 points (mesial, buccal, and distal) and an electronic caliper during surgery.

ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Clinical parameter measurements (probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession depth and width, keratinized tissue width and height) were taken on the day of surgery, the 3rd days, the 14th days, the 1st month, the 3rd months and the 6th months.

Ultrasonography measurements A 6-18 MHz intraoral probe was used in intraoral USG examinations. Sterile gel was applied to the intraoral probe and covered with a stretch film. Then, it was placed directly on the mucosal surface of the receiver site in the buccal area. Mucosal thickness was evaluated using the B-mode of the device, and vascularization was evaluated using the color doppler and pulsed wave doppler modes of the device. The following equation is used and calculated by US unit pulsatility index (PI) = (Vmax-Vmin) (Vmean) (Vmax is peak systolic flow velocity. Vmin is diastolic flow velocity and Vmean is mean flow velocity.) The mean PI values of each patient were measured.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

subepithelial connective tissue graft

The area where the gingival recession occurred was prepared with the modified coronally positioned flap technique developed by Zuchelli. The subepithelial connective tissue graft was obtained in each patient using the single incision technique from the region between the mesial of the canine and the mesial of the first molar in the palate. Connective tissue dimensions were approximately 10x5x2 mm. The graft thickness was measured with an endodontic spreader from 3 points (mesial, buccal, and distal) and an electronic caliper during surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

de- epithelize gingival graft

The area where the gingival recession occurred was prepared with the modified coronally positioned flap technique developed by Zuchelli. A shallow horizontal incision was made at ≈3 mm apical from the gingival margin of the maxillary molar teeth using a number 15 scalpel blade. Subsequently, a parallel horizontal incision, at ≈ 4 mm apical from the first horizontal incision, was traced in conjunction with two vertical releasing incisions to delineate a rectangular area. Then, the uppermost epithelial layer was scraped off using a size 11 scalpel tip. The connective tissue graft to be taken from the palate area was 10x5x2 mm in size, and the graft thickness was measured with an endodontic spreader from 3 points (mesial, buccal, and distal) and electronic caliper during surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ultrasonography

Clinical parameter measurements (probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession depth and width, keratinized tissue width and height) were taken on the day of surgery, the 3rd days, the 14th days, the 1st month, the 3rd months and the 6th months.

Ultrasonography measurements A 6-18 MHz intraoral probe was used in intraoral USG examinations. Sterile gel was applied to the intraoral probe and covered with a stretch film. Then, it was placed directly on the mucosal surface of the receiver site in the buccal area. Mucosal thickness was evaluated using the B-mode of the device, and vascularization was evaluated using the color doppler and pulsed wave doppler modes of the device. The following equation is used and calculated by US unit pulsatility index (PI) = (Vmax-Vmin) (Vmean) (Vmax is peak systolic flow velocity. Vmin is diastolic flow velocity and Vmean is mean flow velocity.) The mean PI values of each patient were measured.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with single Miller class 1 or 2 gingival recession who have undergone root coverage surgery.
* 18 to 65 years old
* non-smoker and non-alcoholic.
* Patients who have good oral hygiene and whose inflammation can be controlled (FMPS \<25%, FMBS \<25%, probing depth ≤ 3mm, and bleeding on probing \<10%)
* Those who have no previous history of periodontal surgery in the operation area

Exclusion Criteria

* Active smokers
* pregnancy and lactation
* Continuation of gingival trauma due to false tooth brushing
* Presence of severe tooth malposition
* Those with systemic diseases that may affect wound healing after periodontal surgery
* Individuals who cannot maintain oral hygiene
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pamukkale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gizem Torumtay Cin

asistant prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GİZEM TORUMTAY CİN, assist prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY FACULTY of DENTISTIRY

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pamukkale University of the Dentistry

Denizli, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023/05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.