The Comparison of the Efficacy of Gingival Unit Graft With Connective Tissue Graft in Root Coverage
NCT ID: NCT04637451
Last Updated: 2020-11-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-07-01
2016-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Gingival Unit Graft
For test group, gingival recessions were treated with gingival unit graft.
Root coverage treatment
Gingival unit graft Connective tissue graft
Connective Tissue Graft
For Control group, gingival recessions were treated with connective tissue graft.
Root coverage treatment
Gingival unit graft Connective tissue graft
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Root coverage treatment
Gingival unit graft Connective tissue graft
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence Miller's class I and II gingival recession in the anterior and premolar teeth
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Lactation
* Any cardiovascular, renal or hepatic conditions
* History of periodontal surgery
* Tooth mobility
* Presence of probing depth \>3 mm and caries or restorations in the teeth undergoing treatment
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Okan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sibel Kayaalti-Yuksek
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sibel Kayaaltı Yüksek
Istanbul, Tuzla, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zucchelli G, Mounssif I. Periodontal plastic surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun;68(1):333-68. doi: 10.1111/prd.12059.
Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Buti J, Baccini M, Graziani F, Tonelli P, Pagavino G, Tonetti MS. Root coverage procedures improve patient aesthetics. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Nov;43(11):965-975. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12603. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
Allen AL. Use of the gingival unit transfer in soft tissue grafting: report of three cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004 Apr;24(2):165-75.
Kuru B, Yildirim S. Treatment of localized gingival recessions using gingival unit grafts: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2013 Jan;84(1):41-50. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.110685. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
Yildirim S, Kuru B. Gingival unit transfer using in the Miller III recession defect treatment. World J Clin Cases. 2015 Feb 16;3(2):199-203. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i2.199.
Del Pizzo M, Modica F, Bethaz N, Priotto P, Romagnoli R. The connective tissue graft: a comparative clinical evaluation of wound healing at the palatal donor site. A preliminary study. J Clin Periodontol. 2002 Sep;29(9):848-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290910.x.
Douglas de Oliveira DW, Oliveira-Ferreira F, Flecha OD, Goncalves PF. Is surgical root coverage effective for the treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity? A systematic review. J Periodontol. 2013 Mar;84(3):295-306. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120143. Epub 2012 May 1.
Camargo PM, Melnick PR, Kenney EB. The use of free gingival grafts for aesthetic purposes. Periodontol 2000. 2001;27:72-96. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.027001072.x. No abstract available.
Kayaalti-Yuksek S, Yaprak E. The comparison of the efficacy of gingival unit graft with connective tissue graft in recession defect coverage: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2761-2770. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04252-5. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015/174
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id