Comparing Tunnel Technique and CAF With CTG in Mandibular Gingival Recession Treatment
NCT ID: NCT06135662
Last Updated: 2024-03-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-11
2025-06-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Tunnel vs. CAF for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT05122468
Comparing TCAF and MTUN With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Single Recessions in the Premandible
NCT07158541
Long-term Outcomes of Tunnel Technique
NCT04016493
Clinical Evaluation of the Modified Laterally Stretched Technique (RT2) Gingival Recession vs Tunneling With CT Grafting
NCT06044870
Comparing CAF and TCAF With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Multiple Recessions in the Premandibula.
NCT06940050
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Healthy participants diagnosed with mandibular gingival recession will be enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo either the CAF or TT+CTG surgical procedure. The study will follow a structured timeline with a total of six assessment visits for each participant, scheduled at key intervals: 1 week, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-operation. These time points are chosen to effectively monitor both the immediate and the long-term results of the treatments.
The primary outcome measure, Mean Root Coverage (MRC), will be evaluated at each follow-up visit to quantify the extent of root coverage achieved by the respective surgical techniques. Secondary outcome measures include the assessment of Vestibular Depth (VD), Complete Root Coverage (CRC), changes in Keratinized Tissue Width (KT), and changes in Gingival Thickness (GT). These measures will provide a comprehensive understanding of the physiological and aesthetic impacts of the surgical interventions.
By comparing the outcomes from both treatment groups, the study aims to provide clear evidence on the effectiveness of CAF versus TT+CTG in treating mandibular gingival recession, guiding future clinical decisions and patient care strategies in periodontology.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CAF + CTG
This arm involves patients treated with the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) technique, a recognized method for treating gingival recession. As an active comparator, this arm serves to compare the effectiveness and outcomes of CAF against the alternative surgical method used in the study.
CAF + CTG
Surgical techniques for mandibular gingival recession: coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft. Participants undergo initial evaluations, including periodontal exams and digital imaging, followed by standardized pre-operative preparations. Post-surgery, uniform care includes pain management and oral hygiene instructions, with follow-ups to monitor healing and assess outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes, like root coverage and patient-reported satisfaction, are consistently measured across groups. Standardized data collection and analysis procedures ensure reliable, comparable results, facilitating an effective comparison of the surgical methods' efficacy.
Tunnel Technique + CTG
Patients in this arm receive the Tunnel Technique (TT) with Connective Tissue Grafts (CTG). Also an established method for gingival recession treatment, this arm acts as an active comparator to assess and compare the effectiveness of TT+CTG against the CAF technique.
Tunnel Technique + CTG
Surgical techniques for mandibular gingival recession: tunnel technique + connective tissue graft. Participants undergo initial evaluations, including periodontal exams and digital imaging, followed by standardized pre-operative preparations. Post-surgery, uniform care includes pain management and oral hygiene instructions, with follow-ups to monitor healing and assess outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes, like root coverage and patient-reported satisfaction, are consistently measured across groups. Standardized data collection and analysis procedures ensure reliable, comparable results, facilitating an effective comparison of the surgical methods' efficacy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CAF + CTG
Surgical techniques for mandibular gingival recession: coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft. Participants undergo initial evaluations, including periodontal exams and digital imaging, followed by standardized pre-operative preparations. Post-surgery, uniform care includes pain management and oral hygiene instructions, with follow-ups to monitor healing and assess outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes, like root coverage and patient-reported satisfaction, are consistently measured across groups. Standardized data collection and analysis procedures ensure reliable, comparable results, facilitating an effective comparison of the surgical methods' efficacy.
Tunnel Technique + CTG
Surgical techniques for mandibular gingival recession: tunnel technique + connective tissue graft. Participants undergo initial evaluations, including periodontal exams and digital imaging, followed by standardized pre-operative preparations. Post-surgery, uniform care includes pain management and oral hygiene instructions, with follow-ups to monitor healing and assess outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes, like root coverage and patient-reported satisfaction, are consistently measured across groups. Standardized data collection and analysis procedures ensure reliable, comparable results, facilitating an effective comparison of the surgical methods' efficacy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* presence of RT1 and RT2 gingival recession defects
* recession in the mandibular arch
* recession ≥ 2mm in depth at the buccal aspect
* full-mouth plaque and bleeding score ≤ 20%
* no previous periodontal surgery
* presence of identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) (a step ≤1mm at the CEJ and/or presence of root abrasion, but with identifiable CEJ, will be accepted).
Exclusion Criteria
* contraindications for periodontal surgery
* medications known to affect the gingiva or interfere with wound healing
* pregnancy
* active orthodontic therapy
* caries or restorations in the area to be treated
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Gonzalo Blasi
Clinical Head Staff
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gonzalo Blasi, DDS MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UIC Barcelona
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UIC Barcelona - Clinica Universitaria de Odontologia
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1506-14. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1506.
Cairo F, Nieri M, Cattabriga M, Cortellini P, De Paoli S, De Sanctis M, Fonzar A, Francetti L, Merli M, Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Trombelli L, Zucchelli G, Pini-Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score after treatment of gingival recession: an interrater agreement multicenter study. J Periodontol. 2010 Dec;81(12):1752-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100278. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PER-ECL-2023-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.