Coronally Advanced Flap With Two Different Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT ID: NCT02229669
Last Updated: 2014-09-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-03-31
2013-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Comparison Between Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
NCT01175720
Two Different Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions With Porcine Collagen Matrix
NCT03619096
Coronally Advanced Flap With Connective Tissue Graft and PRF for Recession Coverage
NCT03023995
Clinical, Patient-centered Outcomes and Laser Doppler Flowmetry Using Two Types of SCTG
NCT04093674
Pinhole Surgical Technique With And Without Use Of Buttons For Treatment Of Multiple Gingival Recessions: RCT
NCT02632968
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Horizontal incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using horizontal interdental incisions. An initial horizontal incision was made slightly coronal to the CEJ from the distal to the mesial papilla of the teeth with the recessions. A second incision, 1 to 2 mm apart and parallel to the first incision, was made apically. A sulcular incision was made to link the second incisions and the blade was inserted extending beyond the mucogingival junction, to create a uniform split-thickness flap. The tissue between the two incisions was partially removed to obtain a uniform receptor site that permitted primary closure. Approximation sutures to place the edge of the flap at the base of the remaining papilla were performed.
Horizontal incisions
Performed by using horizontal interdental incisions. An initial horizontal incision was made slightly coronal to the CEJ from the distal to the mesial papilla of the teeth with the recessions. A second incision, 1 to 2 mm apart and parallel to the first incision, was made apically. A sulcular incision was made to link the second incisions and the blade was inserted (2 to 3 mm) extending beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ), to create a uniform split-thickness flap. The tissue between the two incisions was partially removed to obtain a uniform receptor site that permitted primary closure. Approximation sutures to place the edge of the flap at the base of the remaining papilla were performed. Passive closure of the wound margins without tension was achieved with interrupted coaptation.
Oblique incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using oblique incisions in interdental areas, according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli \& De Sanctis (2000). Oblique submarginal interdental incisions were performed and continued with the intrasulcular incisions at the recession defects, resulting in a envelop flap that was raised with a split-full-split approach in the coronal-apical direction. During coronal advancement, each surgical papilla was dislocated with respect to the de-epithelized anatomic papilla by the oblique incisions. Interrupted sutures were performed to stabilize single surgical papilla over the interdental connective tissue bed.
Oblique incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using oblique incisions in interdental areas, according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli \& De Sanctis (2000). Oblique submarginal interdental incisions were performed and continued with the intrasulcular incisions at the recession defects, resulting in a envelop flap that was raised with a split-full-split approach in the coronal-apical direction. During coronal advancement, each surgical papilla was dislocated with respect to the de-epithelized anatomic papilla by the oblique incisions. Interrupted sutures were performed to stabilize single surgical papilla over the interdental connective tissue bed.
Horizontal incisions
Performed by using horizontal interdental incisions. An initial horizontal incision was made slightly coronal to the CEJ from the distal to the mesial papilla of the teeth with the recessions. A second incision, 1 to 2 mm apart and parallel to the first incision, was made apically. A sulcular incision was made to link the second incisions and the blade was inserted (2 to 3 mm) extending beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ), to create a uniform split-thickness flap. The tissue between the two incisions was partially removed to obtain a uniform receptor site that permitted primary closure. Approximation sutures to place the edge of the flap at the base of the remaining papilla were performed. Passive closure of the wound margins without tension was achieved with interrupted coaptation.
Oblique incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using oblique incisions in interdental areas, according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli \& De Sanctis (2000). Oblique submarginal interdental incisions were performed and continued with the intrasulcular incisions at the recession defects, resulting in a envelop flap that was raised with a split-full-split approach in the coronal-apical direction. During coronal advancement, each surgical papilla was dislocated with respect to the de-epithelized anatomic papilla by the oblique incisions. Interrupted sutures were performed to stabilize single surgical papilla over the interdental connective tissue bed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Horizontal incisions
Performed by using horizontal interdental incisions. An initial horizontal incision was made slightly coronal to the CEJ from the distal to the mesial papilla of the teeth with the recessions. A second incision, 1 to 2 mm apart and parallel to the first incision, was made apically. A sulcular incision was made to link the second incisions and the blade was inserted (2 to 3 mm) extending beyond the mucogingival junction (MGJ), to create a uniform split-thickness flap. The tissue between the two incisions was partially removed to obtain a uniform receptor site that permitted primary closure. Approximation sutures to place the edge of the flap at the base of the remaining papilla were performed. Passive closure of the wound margins without tension was achieved with interrupted coaptation.
Oblique incisions
Coronally advanced flap was performed by using oblique incisions in interdental areas, according to the technique proposed by Zucchelli \& De Sanctis (2000). Oblique submarginal interdental incisions were performed and continued with the intrasulcular incisions at the recession defects, resulting in a envelop flap that was raised with a split-full-split approach in the coronal-apical direction. During coronal advancement, each surgical papilla was dislocated with respect to the de-epithelized anatomic papilla by the oblique incisions. Interrupted sutures were performed to stabilize single surgical papilla over the interdental connective tissue bed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients should have bilateral Class I and II MGRs (Miller 1985) in maxillary tooth (at least three recession-type defects affecting adjacent teeth in each side of the maxilla).
* At least 20 teeth and no sites with attachment loss and probing pocket depth (PPD) \> 3 mm.
* Full-mouth plaque and bleeding on probing of \< 20%.
* Involved tooth should present tooth vitality, absence of caries, restorations or extensive non-carious cervical lesion.
Exclusion Criteria
* Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory therapies in the previous 2 months.
* Previous mucogingival surgery at the region to be treated
* Systemic conditions that could affect tissue healing (e.g. diabetes).
* Use of orthodontic appliances.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Paulista University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Guilherme Barrella
MS, DDS
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Suzana Pimentel, PHD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Paulista University
Guilherme Barrella, MS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Paulista University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1158-9611
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.