Clinical, Patient-centered Outcomes and Laser Doppler Flowmetry Using Two Types of SCTG

NCT ID: NCT04093674

Last Updated: 2019-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-01

Study Completion Date

2019-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This split-mouth randomized clinical trial compared two different types of subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) considering clinical parameters and patient-centered outcomes in patients with bilateral RT 1 multiple gingival recessions after 6 months postoperatively. 21 patients with 84 sites were surgically treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) associated with SCTG harvested by: double blade scalpel (DBS) and de-epithelized (DE) SCTG. Periodontal clinical parameters and aesthetics were evaluated by a calibrated periodontist at baseline and after 6 months. Patient-centered outcomes related to pain/discomfort and aesthetics were assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after 7 days and 6 months, respectively. Gingival blood flows were analyzed by Laser Doppler flowmetry (FLD) at baseline and 2, 7 and 14 days postoperatively.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Clinical parameters and patient-centered outcomes

Periodontal clinical examination was performed by a blind and calibrated examiner (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.72) using a North Carolina periodontal probe (PCPUNC-Hu-Friedy®). Periodontal parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months postoperatively and included:

1. Recession depth (RD) - Distance in millimeters of cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to gingival margin measured at the midbuccal aspect of the tooth;
2. Recession width (RW) - Distance between interproximal gingival margins of GR with periodontal probe positioned at CEJ;
3. Probing depth (PD) - Distance in millimeters from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus;
4. Clinical attachment level (CAL) - Distance in millimeters from the CEJ to the bottom of the gingival sulcus;
5. Keratinized tissue width (KTW) - Distance in millimeters from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction measured at the midbuccal aspect of the tooth;
6. Keratinized tissue thickness (KTT): determined 1.5 mm apically to gingival margin with an anesthesia needle and a rubber endodontic stop inserted perpendicularly into the soft tissue and measured with a digital caliper.

The index proposed by Zucchelli \& DeSanctis (2000) was used to calculate percentage of root coverage (%RC), as follows:

RRC=(100.(RD baseline-RD 6 months))/(RD baseline) Patient centered outcomes and professional assessment were evaluated with visual analog scales (VAS). VAS was administered verbally to the patients to assess aesthetics and postoperative pain/discomfort. Patients were asked to make a mark in a scale between 0 (not satisfied or extreme pain) and 10 (very satisfied or no pain). Pain and discomfort were recorded after 7 days and patient´s aesthetic evaluation after 6 months. An experienced periodontist (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.95) evaluated aesthetic outcome after 6 months.

The Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) technique (VMS-LDF2 DUAL CHANNEL- Laser Doppler Blood Flow and Temperature Monitor (Moor instruments- process number-FAPESP 2012/13331-2) was used to evaluate blood flow on the recipient sites. LDF is equipped with a laser diode that emits in the infrared spectrum range (Maximum power - 2.5mW, wavelenghts 785nm±10nm). Measurements with LDF were performed with two probes for 1 minute and 30 seconds. These measurements were recorded three times for each site with intervals of one minute.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession, Generalized

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Split mouth
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clinical evaluation

Clinical periodontal parameters

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

de-epithelized (DE) SCTG

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

subepithelial connective tissue grafts

Laser Doppler Flowmetry

Laser Doppler Flowmetry evaluation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

de-epithelized (DE) SCTG

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

subepithelial connective tissue grafts

Patient centered outcomes

Pain and discomfort/ Esthetics

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

de-epithelized (DE) SCTG

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

subepithelial connective tissue grafts

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

de-epithelized (DE) SCTG

subepithelial connective tissue grafts

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

double blade scalpel (DBS) SCTG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* systemically healthy patients between 18 and 70 years
* clinical diagnosis of bilateral multiple gingival recessions, recession type (RT) 1 (Cairo et al. 2011) with at least one gingival recession ≥ 2 mm on each side, including canines and premolars.

Exclusion Criteria

* abnormal teeth position
* smokers, pregnant or nursing women
* parafunctional habits
* plaque and bleeding indexes (Ainamo \& Bay, 1975) above 20%
* previous periodontal surgeries on selected sites.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mariana Ragghianti Zangrando

Assistent Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mariana S Ragghianti Zangrando, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bauru School of Dentistry-University of Sao Paulo

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zuhr O, Baumer D, Hurzeler M. The addition of soft tissue replacement grafts in plastic periodontal and implant surgery: critical elements in design and execution. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S123-42. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12185.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24640997 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SCTG21

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02818855 COMPLETED PHASE4