Guided Versus Non-Guided Harvesting Technique of Soft Tissue Graft in Cairo Recession Type I Sites

NCT ID: NCT06603467

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-15

Study Completion Date

2024-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the healing pattern in the palate following harvesting of deepithelialized free gingival graft by two different harvesting techniques and to compare the recession coverage at the recipient sites.

. The main questions it aims to answer are:

• Does the harvesting technique will affect the healing pattern \&the recipient site coverage in the treatment of gingival recession?

Participants will:

* Receive in the recession sites, in group 1 deepithelialized free gingival graft harvested without guide \& group 2: will be covered with graft harvested with guide
* Visit the clinic twenty-four hours after surgery and weekly visits for 1 month, early wound healing at the sites of harvesting will be assessed
* The recession coverage will be assessed at 3\& 6 months after surgery

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Over the last few years, deepithelialized free gingival graft has become a gold standard treatment modality for increasing the width of keratinized gingiva, root coverage, alveolar ridge deficiencies management of peri-implant tissue abnormalities, and papillary loss. The procedure of harvesting the graft from the palate is often associated with the noteworthy challenge of procurement of the largest volume of tissue possible while minimizing associated trauma to anatomical structure, also special designs of the graft may be required. To meet these requirements and overcome the challenges, an innovative digitally designed guide for harvesting the graft is designed to allow ideally designed graft with minimal trauma to the tissue.

Aim: To compare the healing pattern in palate following harvesting of deepithelialized free gingival graft by two different harvesting techniques and to compare the recession coverage at the recipient sites.

Methodology: Twenty recession sites with RT1 Cairo classification will be recruited for this study. Sites were randomly divided into 2 treatment groups as follows: group 1 :10 sites will be covered with deepithelialized free gingival graft harvested without guide \& group 2 :10 sites will be covered with CTG harvested with guide. Sites in both groups will be covered with laterally or coronally positioned flap. Twenty-four hours after surgery and weekly visits for 1 month, early wound healing at the sites of harvesting will be assessed using the Early Wound Healing Score (EHS) EHS. This score assessed clinical signs of re-epithelialization (CSR), clinical signs of hemostasis (CSH), and clinical signs of inflammation (CSI). Since complete wound epithelialization was the main outcome, the CSR score was weighted to be 60% of the total final score. Accordingly, a score of 0, 3, or 6 points was possible for the assessment of CSR, whereas scores of 0, 1, or 2 points were possible for CSH and CSI. Higher values indicated better healing. Accordingly, the score for ideal early wound healing was 10. Regarding soft tissue coverage, Gingival recession depth (GRD) \& Gingival recession width (GRW) will be measured at baseline, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Also, each group will be subjected to intraoral scanning at baseline, 3 and 6 months after surgery to measure gingival thickness and level by superimposition of scanning files of different intervals to monitor the changes by software.

Statistical analysis will be done using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Intergroup analysis was done using Mann-Whitney test and intra-group analysis will be done using Kruskal-Wallis test for all the study parameters. Statistical significance will set at a p-value of less than 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recessions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group 1

gingival recession will be covered with de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested without guide

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

non-guided de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

gingival recession will be covered with de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested without guide

group 2

gingival recession will be covered with de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested with guide

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

guided de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

gingival recession will be covered with de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested with digital guide

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

non-guided de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested

gingival recession will be covered with de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested without guide

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

guided de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested

gingival recession will be covered with de-epithelialized free gingival graft harvested with digital guide

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Gingival recession sited classifies as Cairo type I
* must have a general health showing no contraindications for oral surgery,
* must be at least 20 years old.
* patients also had to have good oral hygiene before the treatment

Exclusion Criteria

* signs or symptoms of bruxism or clenching i
* patients suffering from uncontrolled systemic conditions
* smoker
* pregnant or lactating
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tanta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

safinaz saleh mohamed saeed

lecturer in periodontology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

bassem nabil elfahl, lecturer in periodontology

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta university

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry,Tanta university

Tanta, Tanta, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

#R-OMPDR-2-24-3097

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.