Treatment of Gingival Recession Using Gingival Composite Restoration Versus Coronally Advanced Flap

NCT ID: NCT04584931

Last Updated: 2020-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Treatment of gingival recession requires favourable anatomical conditions and the use of invasive surgical approaches. Hence, these procedures are not always indicated in all cases and can cause great pain and morbidity. Coloured composite restorations that mimic the lost gingival tissues can provide a non-invasive and simple solution regardless of the recession soft and hard-tissue conditions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gingival recession (also known as marginal tissue recession) is defined as the downward displacement of the soft tissues around teeth that would have been otherwise covering the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), thus exposing the root surface clinically. Recession is one of the most prevalent mucogingival conditions worldwide, affecting between 30% to 100% of the overall population, and its incidence increases with age. Main concerns regarding recession ranging from unacceptable esthetics to the patient, dentinal hypersensitivity, development of carious and non-carious cervical lesions, or impairment of adequate plaque control.

The ultimate aim for treating gingival recession is to provide complete coverage of the root with optimal esthetics and function. A wide range of surgical interventions have been investigated to provide for successful root coverage including rotational and advanced pedicle flaps, free gingival grafts, or regenerative modalities such as guided tissue regeneration. The predictability of surgical techniques depends on patient related factors such as smoking, oral hygiene care and compliance, defect related conditions like depth, width, gingival thickness and interdental attachment level, and finally, operator related skills and experience.

Coronally advanced flap (CAF) with or without the use of connective tissue graft is considered the gold standard for root coverage due to its ability to achieve complete root coverage in favorable defects, superior esthetic outcomes and blending with surrounding gingiva, and the possible realignment and increase in keratinized tissue height. On the other hand, CAF is faced with multiple drawbacks. Complete root coverage in CAF procedures is not predictable in cases with interdental attachment loss. The surgery poses added morbidity, discomfort and pain, and donor site (if present) may augment these complications. Scar formation as a result of incisions or sutures may reduce the overall esthetic appeal. It requires frequent follow-up visits and arduous post-operative instructions. Post-operative results are not stable over long period of time with frequent relapse. The procedure cannot be performed in cases with systemic contraindications for surgical interventions. And finally, it is time-consuming and requires surgical skill and training of the operator.

To overcome all of the abovementioned drawbacks of CAF, composite resin restorative material with pink shades known as "gingival composite" has been proposed to manage gingival recessions. Root coverage with composite is known to effectively reduce dentinal hypersensitivity effectively. Hence, managing gingival recession with this restorative procedure, the patients concerns regarding esthetics or hypersensitivity can be directly addressed using a simple and fast technique. Compared to CAF, restorative procedure shows less pain, morbidity and bleeding, and it does not involve surgical incisions/sutures and hence avoids no scar formation. Pink composite can be presented as a solution in cases that are not expected to benefit from CAF such as RT3, and it can treat carious and non-carious cervical lesions in one step. In addition, it requires less operative time and can be performed by general practitioners and with conventional armamentarium.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment of gingival recession with colored composite

Composite restoration will be applied to the gingival recession defect

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

restorative intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

colored composite restoration to camouflage the gingival recession defect

Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap

coronally advanced flap at the gingival defect

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

coronally advanced flap

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

flap surgery to achieve root coverage at gingival recession defect

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

coronally advanced flap

flap surgery to achieve root coverage at gingival recession defect

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

restorative intervention

colored composite restoration to camouflage the gingival recession defect

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* participants with at least one buccal gingival recession
* O'Leary plaque index less than 20%
* motivated participants willing to complete the follow up

Exclusion Criteria

* prior surgical or restorative interventions at the recession defect
* smokers
* pregnant participants
* systemic conditions contraindicating dental management
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Mohamed AbdelRaouf Hussein

Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed Elfana, MSc

Role: CONTACT

+2011101102221

Karim Fawzy El-Sayed, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1:3:7

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.