Amnion Membrane Versus DFGG Using the Tunneling Technique in Management of Gingival Recession Defects.

NCT ID: NCT06146855

Last Updated: 2024-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-05

Study Completion Date

2024-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Treatment of gingival recession is indicated mainly for esthetic reasons and keratinized tissue augmentation (Zucchelli and Mounssif, 2015). An array of surgical techniques has been proposed by the literature to cover gingival recession defects with well-documented successful outcomes. The selection of one technique over the other depends on many factors. Some of these factors are related to the gingival recession defect itself, others are related to the anatomy of the palatal fibromucosa, or related to the patient variabilities (Zucchelli and De Sanctis, 2000).

Controversy exists in the literature regarding the patient morbidity after connective tissue graft harvesting. Inconclusive postulations have been made about the post-operative patient morbidity outcomes and root coverage outcomes when comparing connective tissue graft harvesting in comparison to allograft membranes used for root coverage.

The use of connective tissue graft in combination with root coverage techniques remain the gold standard for root coverage procedures. The problem with the connective tissue graft is that harvesting a graft from the palate increases morbidity, needs an extra surgical site which is more traumatic for the patient, depends on the donor tissue which could be limited, increases surgical chair-time and needs increased surgical skills (Cortellini \& Pini Prato 2012).

The rationale behind the use of amnion membrane is to avoid the morbidity inherent with connective tissue graft harvesting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tunneling with amnion membrane

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tunneling procedure with Amnion Membrane

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root Coverage by tunneling procedure with the addition of Amnion Membrane as a soft tissue substitute

Tunneling with De-epithelialized Free Gingival Graft

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tunneling procedure with De-epithelialized Free Gingival Graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Root Coverage by tunneling procedure with the addition of De-epithelialized Free Gingival Graft

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tunneling procedure with Amnion Membrane

Root Coverage by tunneling procedure with the addition of Amnion Membrane as a soft tissue substitute

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tunneling procedure with De-epithelialized Free Gingival Graft

Root Coverage by tunneling procedure with the addition of De-epithelialized Free Gingival Graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 60 years.
* Periodontally and systemically healthy.
* Presence of RT1 or RT2 buccal gingival recession defects ≥2 mm in depth.
* Full-mouth plaque and bleeding score of \<15% and no probing depths \>3 mm.
* Absence of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) and non-detectable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) at the defect sites.

Exclusion Criteria

* RT3 recession defects.
* Smokers as smoking is a contraindication for any plastic periodontal surgery (Khuller, 2009).
* Presence of caries lesions or restorations in the cervical area.
* Intake of medications which impede periodontal tissue health and healing.
* Medical contraindications for periodontal surgical procedures.
* Uncooperative patients not willing to complete the follow up period.
* Pregnancy and lactation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Mashaly

Assistant lecturer of Periodontology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed Mashaly, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistant lecturer of Periodontology, Cairo University

Noha Ghallab, Phd

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Professor of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Cairo University

Weam El Battawy, Phd

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assistant Professor of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohamed Mashaly, MSc

Role: CONTACT

00201226442241

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mohamed Mashaly, Bsc

Role: primary

00201226442241

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bakhishov H, Isler SC, Bozyel B, Yildirim B, Tekindal MA, Ozdemir B. De-epithelialized gingival graft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions using the tunnel technique: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Jul;48(7):970-983. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13452. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33751615 (View on PubMed)

Ghahroudi AA, Khorsand A, Rokn AR, Sabounchi SS, Shayesteh YS, Soolari A. Comparison of amnion allograft with connective tissue graft for root coverage procedures: a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2013 Oct;15(4):101-12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24364174 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AMvsDFGG

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02818855 COMPLETED PHASE4