Xenogenic Collagen Matrix vs. Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Early Maxillary Implants

NCT ID: NCT07024186

Last Updated: 2025-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-17

Study Completion Date

2025-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares two methods used to improve gingival tissue around dental implants placed in (the maxillary esthetic zone). After a tooth is removed and a dental implant is placed early (usually 4-8 weeks later), additional soft tissue is sometimes needed to ensure the implant looks natural and functions well. The two techniques being studied are:

Subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) - where tissue is taken from the patient's own mouth (usually the palate)

Xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) - a processed collagen material from animals, used as a substitute for the patient's own tissue.

The goal is to see which method is better in terms of gingival thickness, esthetic appearance, healing, and patient comfort. This research may help dentists choose the most effective and comfortable treatment for their patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dental implants in the anterior maxillary region (esthetic zone) are commonly used to replace missing teeth. When implants are placed using the early placement protocol (typically 4-8 weeks after tooth extraction), additional soft tissue volume may be required to ensure an esthetically pleasing and functionally stable result.

Soft tissue augmentation can be achieved using:

Subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG): A technique that involves harvesting tissue from the patient's own palate and placing it around the implant to improve gingival thickness and contour.

Xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM): A biocompatible, animal-derived collagen scaffold designed to substitute for autologous tissue, reducing patient morbidity and surgical time.

This study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-arm clinical trial conducted at Minia University, Faculty of Dentistry. Eligible patients missing a single tooth in the anterior maxilla with a thin gingival biotype and requiring early implant placement were recruited. A total of 20 patients were randomly assigned into two groups (10 per group):

Group 1 (Control): Received subepithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the palate using the single-incision technique.

Group 2 (Test): Received xenogeneic collagen matrix (Mucoderm®) adapted and inserted into the grafting site.

Outcome Measures:

Primary Outcome:

Change in gingival thickness (GT) at 12 months post-surgery, measured via transgingival probing using a standardized protocol.

Secondary Outcomes:

Change in width of keratinized tissue (KTW)

Esthetic outcome (using clinical photographs and standardized scoring systems, e.g., Pink Esthetic Score)

Post-operative healing and complications

Patient-reported outcomes regarding comfort, pain, and satisfaction (using Visual Analog Scale questionnaires)

Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months post-implant placement.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of Minia University, and all participants provided informed consent. The study adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-GCP guidelines.

This research aims to provide evidence on whether xenogeneic collagen matrix can serve as a viable, less invasive alternative to autogenous tissue grafts in implant dentistry, especially for cases with esthetic demand and thin soft tissue biotype.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alveolar Bone Loss Gingival Recession Peri-implant Mucositis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants are assigned in parallel to either the xenogeneic collagen matrix group or the subepithelial connective tissue graft group for soft tissue augmentation around early implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone. Group allocation is determined by simple randomization using a coin toss.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The outcomes assessor responsible for evaluating soft tissue volume and esthetic results is blinded to the group allocation to reduce assessment bias. Participants and care providers are not blinded due to the nature of the surgical interventions.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix

This arm involves the use of a xenogeneic collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation around early implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix The xenogeneic collagen matrix is a biomaterial used to promote soft tissue regeneration and support healing in dental implant procedures.

Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft

This arm involves the use of a subepithelial connective tissue graft for soft tissue augmentation around early implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

subepithelial connective tissue graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ubepithelial Connective Tissue Graft The subepithelial connective tissue graft is a biological tissue taken from the patient's own palate or other donor sites to promote healing and aesthetic outcomes around dental implants.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix The xenogeneic collagen matrix is a biomaterial used to promote soft tissue regeneration and support healing in dental implant procedures.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

subepithelial connective tissue graft

ubepithelial Connective Tissue Graft The subepithelial connective tissue graft is a biological tissue taken from the patient's own palate or other donor sites to promote healing and aesthetic outcomes around dental implants.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Non-restorable or hopeless teeth from maxillary anterior to first premolar due to one or more of the following:
* Extensive caries
* Root fractures
* Inability to perform functional crown lengthening due to gingival zenith line with high gingival display
* Improper crown-to-root ratio due to bone removal leading to aesthetic or restorative failure
* Patients aged 25-55 years
* Both male and female patients
* Thin tissue biotype

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Smokers
* Presence of persistent chronic infection at the implant site
* Patients in the growth phase with partially erupted teeth
* Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism or clenching that may overload the implant
* Patients with insufficient vertical inter-arch space in centric occlusion to accommodate restorative components
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Minia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Omar ismail phd

PhD Candidate, Faculty of Dentistry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed O Ismail, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Minya

Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Study ID: 505-2021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Interdental Guided Creeping Technique
NCT06264869 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA