Microsurgical vs Macro Surgical Approach for Grade II Gingival Recessions Employing Laterally Repositioned Flap

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-24

Study Completion Date

2018-08-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study was conducted to assess the evaluation of micro and Macro surgical approach in the treatment of grade II gingival recessions using the laterally repositioned flap

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Periodontal Phenotype and Laterally Positioned Flap in Isolated Gingival Recession

NCT04255888

Gingival Recession

UNKNOWN NA

Effect of Vestibular Depth on Predictability of Miller Class III/ RT2 Gingival Recession Coverage

NCT06000228

Gingival Recession, Localized

RECRUITING NA

Coronally Advanced Flap With Connective Tissue Graft and PRF for Recession Coverage

NCT03023995

Gingival Recession

COMPLETED PHASE3

Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions

NCT02335866

Gingival Recessions

COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1

Placental Membrane for Root Coverage

NCT03053921

Gingival Recession

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study total, 30 patients were selected The patients initially received a comprehensive periodontal examination and complete plaque control program including oral hygiene to eliminate habits related to the aetiology of recession. Scaling, root planning and occlusal adjustments were done The patients were randomly assigned and divided into two groups. Group A and Group B. Patients with miller class II were treated with a laterally repositioned flap to obtain root coverage using conventional macrosurgical approach (15patients) and microsurgical approach(15patients)

The clinical parameters evaluated were height of gingival recession relative clinical attachment level which was measured as the distance from a fixed point in a stent to the bottom of the pocket and gingival biotype at baseline, 3 months and 6 months period

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession, Localized

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The patients will be equally divided into two test groups. Group A and Group B after phase I therapy. the group A patients will be treated with laterally repositioned flap to obtain root coverage using microsurgical approach. The group B patients will be treated with laterally repositioned flap to obtain root coverage using macrosurgical approach

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

experimental group

Group A-15 patients were allocated to the microsurgical group for root coverage. following scaling and root planning, the laterally repositioned flap was done using the microsurgical approach

Group B-15 Patients were allocated to the conventional group for root coverage following scaling and root planning, the laterally repositioned flap was done using the macrosurgical approach

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

root coverage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Group A: After administration of local anaesthesia using ophthalmic microsurgical knives a V-shaped incision was made in the gingival recession area. the gingiva was removed .the adjacent partial thickness pedicle flap was reflected from the donor area .the pedicle flap was then covered over the recipient site. then secured with 6-0 absorbable sling suture without tension. the surgical procedure was done with seilar microscope 40X magnification.

Group B: After administration of local anaesthesia using 15 no blade a V-shaped incision was made in the gingival recession area . gingiva was removed .the adjacent partial thickness pedicle flap was reflected from the donor area .the pedicle flap was then covered over the recipient site. then carefully secured with 4-0 absorbable sling suture

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

root coverage

Group A: After administration of local anaesthesia using ophthalmic microsurgical knives a V-shaped incision was made in the gingival recession area. the gingiva was removed .the adjacent partial thickness pedicle flap was reflected from the donor area .the pedicle flap was then covered over the recipient site. then secured with 6-0 absorbable sling suture without tension. the surgical procedure was done with seilar microscope 40X magnification.

Group B: After administration of local anaesthesia using 15 no blade a V-shaped incision was made in the gingival recession area . gingiva was removed .the adjacent partial thickness pedicle flap was reflected from the donor area .the pedicle flap was then covered over the recipient site. then carefully secured with 4-0 absorbable sling suture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 20-50 yrs
* ClassII gingival recession
* Vital teeth that were free from caries or inadequate restorations
* Sufficient width of attached gingiva