Periodontal Phenotype and Laterally Positioned Flap in Isolated Gingival Recession

NCT ID: NCT04255888

Last Updated: 2020-06-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to estimate the effect of periodontal phenotype on the outcome of isolated gingival recession by laterally positioned flap.The primary objective of study is to assess the changes in gingival margin in the donor tooth after laterally positioned flap over a period of 6 months and to assess the influence of periodontal phenotype on the stability of results of root coverage achieved through laterally positioned flap. The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate root coverage by laterally positioned flap in thick periodontal phenotype and to evaluate root coverage by laterally positioned flap in thin periodontal phenotype.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A variety of surgical techniques have been proposed to achieve successful and predictable root coverage. These include coronally advanced flap, lateral positioned flap (LPF) free gingival graft, free connective tissue graft, and guided tissue regeneration. LPF, originally described by Grupe and Warren in 1964 is one of the most commonly performed root coverage technique.The procedure has undergone various modification over the years .Staffileno and pfeifer and Heller advocated the use of split-thickness flap to minimize the potential risk for the development of recession in the donor tooth.Wood et al used re-entry procedures to compare crestal radicular bone responses to full and partial thickness flaps. They concluded that regardless of the flap procedure, loss of crestal bone depended on the periodontal phenotype.The term periodontal phenotype refers to phenotypic characteristic of bone and soft tissue that make up the periodontium. Periodontal phenotype is typically used to describe the buccolingual tissue thickness and gingival morphology. It is divided into thick flat and thin scalloped type. However there is a paucity of studies in the literature studying the effect periodontal phenotype on the root coverage obtained and its stability over time after LPF. Furthermore the impact of periodontal phenotype on the donor area in this procedure has not been explored. Therefore the present study is designed with the aim to evaluate the influence of periodontal phenotype on the outcome of root coverage by LPF.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Thick periodontal phenotype

Laterally positioned flap will be performed in isolated gingival recession belonging thick periodontal phenotype .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laterally positioned flap in thick periodontal phenotype.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laterally positioned flap will be performed in isolated gingival recession belonging thick periodontal phenotype .

Thin periodontal phenotype

Laterally positioned flap will be performed in isolated gingival recession belonging thin periodontal phenotype .

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laterally positioned flap in thin periodontal phenotype.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laterally positioned flap will be performed in isolated gingival recession belonging thin periodontal phenotype .

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laterally positioned flap in thick periodontal phenotype.

Laterally positioned flap will be performed in isolated gingival recession belonging thick periodontal phenotype .

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laterally positioned flap in thin periodontal phenotype.

Laterally positioned flap will be performed in isolated gingival recession belonging thin periodontal phenotype .

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Isolated Miller's class I, class II, and class III gingival recession in the anterior region
* Gingival Recession depth should be ≥2mm.
* Width of keratinized gingiva ≥3 mm on the immediately adjacent tooth

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a history of systemic condition that might alter the course of disease and /or wound healing such as diabetes mellitus, immunologic disorders.
* Pregnant and lactating women .
* Non vital tooth
* Smokers
* Caries, cervical abrasion or restoration on the labial aspect of tooth with gingival recession.
* Periodontal surgical treatment during previous 24 months on the involved sites.
* Miller's class IV. All potential participants would be explained the need and design of study .Only those subjects who consented for the study will be included after obtaining an informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anjali kothari

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

post graduate institute of dental sciences,rohtak

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences

Rohtak, Haryana, India

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

RAJINDER SHARMA

Role: CONTACT

01262283876

SHARMA

Role: CONTACT

01262283876

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

SANJAY TEWARI

Role: primary

01262283876

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Anjali perio

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.