Digital Planning and Guided Dual Technique in Aesthetic Crown Lengthening

NCT ID: NCT04922086

Last Updated: 2024-05-10

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 24 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2019-09-19
• Study Completion Date: 2021-08-01

Brief Summary

Excessive gingival exposure, commonly named gingival smile, results in a dentogingival disharmony. One of the gingival smile treatment is the aesthetics-related crown lengthening surgery (ACL) to provide a adequate clinical crown length and diminish gingival display. In this context, digital planning and guided dual technique have been proposed to increase the effectiveness and predictability of the ACL. In this technique, an facial and dental analysis of the patient is performed and transferred to a digital model obtained by intraoral digital scan. The digital model is used to create a double guide that will determine the final position of the gingival and alveolar margin in the ACL. Despite the technique showing promising results, clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of this technique are scarce. The present study aims to evaluate the digital planning and guided dual technique in the ACL in comparison to conventional technique in relation to the predictability/stability of the gingival margin positioning and patient satisfaction after the ACL. Twenty-four patients diagnosed with altered passive eruption type I subcategory B will be selected and divided into two groups. In the control group (n = 12) patients will be submitted to the conventional ACL planned using clinical examination; in the test group (n = 12) patients will be submitted to ACL using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), digital planning and guided dual technique. Periodontal clinical parameters including probing depth (PS), clinical attachment level (CAL), clinical crown length (CCL), anatomical crown length (ACL) and cemento-enamel junction to alveolar bone crest distance will be evaluated clinically at baseline, in the immediate postoperative, 4, 8 and 12 months after the procedure. Participants will be submitted to questionnaires to assess satisfaction with the smile, gum and tooth characteristics and experience with the procedure. The investigators aim to demonstrate with the study the effectiveness of the both techniques and evaluate the clinical cost benefit for the patient and the dentist of the guided dual technique in relation to the conventional ACL technique.

Conditions

Tooth Eruption Disorder

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

Test group

Patients will be submitted to ACL planned using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), digital planning and guided dual technique.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Guided dual aesthetic crown lengthening surgery

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

The double guide will be positioned and an internal bevel incision on each tooth will be made following the guide demarcation. After the initial incision, the incised gingival tissue will be removed using a periodontal curette. An internal bevel incision will be made in the involved teeth and a full thickness flap will be displaced up to the the mucogingival junction level to expose the bone crest (BC). The dual guide will be positioned again and the bone tissue will be removed using carbide drills and manual chisels following the double guide. No interproximal crestal bone will be removed. Simple interproximal interrupted sutures will be performed to stabilize the flap.

Control group

Patients will be submitted to the conventional ACL planned using clinical examination.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional aesthetic crown lengthening surgery

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

The demarcation of the gingival zenith final position will be done on the teeth using a periodontal probe. This demarcation will be done through visual examination based on the crown length/width ratio and the position of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). The gingival margin of the central and canine incisors will be positioned at similar heights and a more coronal gingival contour will be determined for the lateral incisors. An internal bevel incision will be made with a blade on each tooth, preserving the interdental papillae. The incised gingival tissue will be removed using a periodontal curette in both groups. An internal bevel incision will be made in the involved teeth and a full thickness flap will be displaced up to the the mucogingival junction level to expose the bone crest (BC). Carbide drills and manual chisels will be used for bone resection to obtained a CEJ-BC distance of 3 mm. Simple interproximal interrupted sutures will be performed.

Interventions

Conventional aesthetic crown lengthening surgery

The demarcation of the gingival zenith final position will be done on the teeth using a periodontal probe. This demarcation will be done through visual examination based on the crown length/width ratio and the position of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). The gingival margin of the central and canine incisors will be positioned at similar heights and a more coronal gingival contour will be determined for the lateral incisors. An internal bevel incision will be made with a blade on each tooth, preserving the interdental papillae. The incised gingival tissue will be removed using a periodontal curette in both groups. An internal bevel incision will be made in the involved teeth and a full thickness flap will be displaced up to the the mucogingival junction level to expose the bone crest (BC). Carbide drills and manual chisels will be used for bone resection to obtained a CEJ-BC distance of 3 mm. Simple interproximal interrupted sutures will be performed.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Guided dual aesthetic crown lengthening surgery

The double guide will be positioned and an internal bevel incision on each tooth will be made following the guide demarcation. After the initial incision, the incised gingival tissue will be removed using a periodontal curette. An internal bevel incision will be made in the involved teeth and a full thickness flap will be displaced up to the the mucogingival junction level to expose the bone crest (BC). The dual guide will be positioned again and the bone tissue will be removed using carbide drills and manual chisels following the double guide. No interproximal crestal bone will be removed. Simple interproximal interrupted sutures will be performed to stabilize the flap.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Non smokers;
• Periodontal and systemically healthy;
• Patients with more than 20 teeth including the six maxillary anterior teeth;
• Altered passive eruption diagnosis (classified as type I subcategory B) in the quadratic anterior teeth.

Exclusion Criteria

• Orthodontic treatment;
• Presence of prosthetic crowns;
• Extensive restorations;
• Extensive incisal edge attrition;
• Misalignment on maxillary anterior teeth.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 50 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Alfenas

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Suzane C Pigossi, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidade Federal de Alfenas

Locations

Universidade Federal de Alfenas

Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Countries

Brazil

Other Identifiers

ACL - UNIFAL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id