Efficacy of a Modified Technique of Free Gingival Graft in Volumetric Changes of the Graft: Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT02613702

Last Updated: 2025-05-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2025-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare a new technique of free gingival graft to the original one, in order to evaluate the stability of the graft volume over one year and other variables. Twenty patients will receive the original technique of free gingival graft (controls) and twenty patients will receive the modified technique, in which the free gingival graft is submerged (tests), at the inferior incisors area.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The free gingival graft surgery is held to gain some keratinized tissue in areas where it has been lost, such as in inferior incisors with gingival recessions. In these areas, tooth brushing may become harder and painful, negatively influencing in plaque control. However, this type of graft seems to contract over time. A new approach of free gingival graft, in which the graft is covered by a flap, promises to provide greater vascularization. This would promote less graft contraction and better mucosal color. Forty patients with less than 2 mm of keratinized tissue (measured from gingival margin to mucogingival junction) in at least one inferior incisor will be included. Half will receive the original technique and half will receive the modified one. Patients will be followed at 7, 14, 21, 28, 42 days, 3, 6, 12 months and 8 years after surgeries.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Modified Free Gingival Graft

Twenty patients will receive the modified free gingival graft technique at the inferior incisors area. In this technique, the graft is covered by a flap, similarly to what is done in a connective tissue graft surgery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Free Gingival Graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical technique (autologous graft): Free gingival graft technique, harvested from palate.

Modified Free Gingival Graft technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical technique (autologous graft): Free gingival graft. positioned at the inferior incisors area and covered by a flap at the donor area

Original Free Gingival Graft technique

Twenty patients will receive the original technique of free gingival graft at the inferior incisors area.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Free Gingival Graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical technique (autologous graft): Free gingival graft technique, harvested from palate.

Original Free Gingival Graft technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical technique (autologous graft): Original technique of free gingival graft, positioned at the inferior incisors area at the donor area

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Free Gingival Graft

Surgical technique (autologous graft): Free gingival graft technique, harvested from palate.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Original Free Gingival Graft technique

Surgical technique (autologous graft): Original technique of free gingival graft, positioned at the inferior incisors area at the donor area

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Modified Free Gingival Graft technique

Surgical technique (autologous graft): Free gingival graft. positioned at the inferior incisors area and covered by a flap at the donor area

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Reduced keratinized tissue (less than 2 mm) in inferior incisors area
* Healthy periodontium in inferior incisors area
* Indication for surgery (e.g. pain during tooth brushing, gingival margin mobility, gingival recession...)
* Recessions class I, II or III, maximum 3 mm
* Having signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Systemic diseases
* Smokers
* Pregnant and lactating women
* Root caries lesions
* Previous surgeries at same area
* Accentuated root abrasion
* Malpositioning teeth
* Residual pocket depths greater than 4 mm
* Tooth mobility greater than 1
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Estadual de Maringá

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Claudio Mendes Pannuti

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Claudio M Pannuti, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sao Paulo

João Batista C Neto, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Sao Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculdade de Odontologia da USP

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cesar Neto JB, Cavalcanti MC, Silva CO, Almeida VC, Sapata VM, Lazarin RO, Jung R, Romito GA, Tatakis DN, Pannuti CM. Digital three-dimensional assessment of free gingival graft remodeling over 12 months. J Dent. 2024 Sep;148:105216. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105216. Epub 2024 Jun 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38950768 (View on PubMed)

Almeida VC, Pannuti CM, Ferreira MS, Lazarin RO, Romito GA, Jung RE, Tatakis DN, Silva COE, Cesar Neto JB. Conventional versus flap-protected free gingival graft: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2023 Jan 6;37:e001. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0001. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36629587 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EFFECT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT02818855 COMPLETED PHASE4