Clinical Evaluation of Gingivalstat Approach Compared to Conventional Esthetic Crown Lengthening on the Stability of The Gingival Margin in Patients With Altered Passive Eruption.
NCT ID: NCT07041541
Last Updated: 2025-10-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-08
2026-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Computer Guided Esthetic Crown Lengthening
NCT05512312
Fully Digital Guided Esthetic Crown Lengthening Surgery
NCT06801548
Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Versus Microsurgical Techniques of Esthetic Crown Lengthening
NCT03804281
Gingival Margin Stability Following Esthetic Crown Lengthening Utilizing a Double Periodontal Surgical Guide
NCT06397521
The Effect of Using Two Different Suturing Techniques on Free Gingival Marginal Stability
NCT04219436
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Altered passive eruption is when the gingival margin is located incisal to the cervical convexity of the crown and away from the cemento-enamel junction of the tooth. It is considered the most frequent related factor, accounting for between 12.1 and 35.8% of excessive gingival display cases that have been identified, according to evidence.
Considering esthetic crown lengthening (ECL) surgery, the goal is to restore the gingival harmony and symmetry by reestablishing the proper clinical crown length. However, stability of the periodontal tissues after ECL is a crucial aspect that can be jeopardized the treatment outcome of the treated region. In particular, gingival margin rebound can impair aesthetics and have an impact on the health of periodontal tissue
Predicting the amount of tissue rebound after esthetic crown lengthening surgery is still controversial. According to literature, there is a tendency to have a gingival regrowth from the immediate postoperative level for up to 3 months. It has been also confirmed that rebound of gingival margin most likely occurs during the first three months following surgery. Another study found that the gingival margin had coronal migration may continue for up to 6-12 months after surgery.
Based on current evidence, gingival margin rebound is a major issue that happens after performing crown lengthening surgery. To avoid this, GingivalStat approach has been proposed to guide the tissue after surgery to remodel early at a predetermined position and avoid the re-growth of gingiva in a coronal direction. It appears to be producing earlier stability. The current study aims to investigate the influence of GingivalStat following crown lengthening versus conventional crown lengthening, in terms of stability of gingival margin.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Interventional group (Gingival Stat approach -- Composite stops after ECL surgery)
Steps 1-6 as Active Comparator group + 7. Resin composite wil be placed on the cervical third of the teeth, following the CEJ anatomy, to act as a gingival stabilizer to guide the early remodelling of tissues.
8\. Removal of sutures and composite after two weeks.
Esthetic Crown Lengthening using GingivalStat approach
Esthetic Crown Lengthening using GingivalStat approach (composite stops)
Control group (Conventional ECL surgery)
1. Following the administration of local anaesthesia, a submarginal internal bevelled incision using 15c blade will be carried out, from canine to canine. The distance from the gingival margin will be based on how much soft tissue needs to be removed to meet the ideal tooth proportion.
2. Intrasulcular incision will be done in the buccal aspect and papilla region for removal of tissue collar.
3. A full thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated using mucoperiosteal elevator, without bypassing the MGJ.
4. To obtain a 3 mm distance between CEJ and bone, osteoctomy wil be carried out from line angle to line angle using high speed hand piece with end-cutting bur.
5. Osteoplasty using round bur, maybe done to reduce bone thickness and obtain adequate anatomical profile.
6. After the flap is repositioned, interrupted sutures using Polypropylene 5-0 will be used to adapt and suture the flap in its new position.
Esthetic Crown Lengthening
Conventional Esthetic Crown Lengthening
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Esthetic Crown Lengthening
Conventional Esthetic Crown Lengthening
Esthetic Crown Lengthening using GingivalStat approach
Esthetic Crown Lengthening using GingivalStat approach (composite stops)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients free of systemic diseases.
3. Patients aged between 18 to 60 years old.
4. Patients maintaining good oral hygiene with full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores \<15%.
5. Patients should be committed to the post-operative care regime, including oral hygiene practices, and follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with periodontal disease.
3. Smokers.
4. Pregnant women.
5. Patients on medication that may interfere with healing (corticosteroids, bisphosphonate, Chemo/radiotherapy)
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmad Elganayni
Principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Composite stops after ECL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.