Esthetic Crown Lengthening With Closed Piezoelectric in Comparison to Open Flap Approach

NCT ID: NCT05478317

Last Updated: 2022-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-18

Study Completion Date

2025-01-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this randomized clinical trial, the investigators are comparing two different approaches for Esthetic crown lengthening- a minimally invasive approach using piezoelectric (PZ) and a traditional open flap approach (OF).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The altered passive eruption is diagnosed when there is an excessive gingival display with short clinical crowns. Esthetic crown lengthening (ECL) is the most common surgical treatment of altered passive eruption. Traditional ECL involves osseous resection with gingivectomy or apical displaced gingiva. The amount of soft and hard tissue removal in this technique aims to provide a healthy and esthetically acceptable crown height. However, gingival tissue coronal rebound is one of the most noted post-operative complications of traditionally used techniques. On the other hand, surgical techniques that include flap reflection may cause more coronal displacement of the gingival margin. Hence, it is crucial to assess different surgical techniques to determine the most effective technique that gives the required outcomes with maximum patient satisfaction.

Piezoelectric bone surgery delivers high precision in resection, good tactile sensibility, and permits a selective cut of mineralized tissue while sparing soft tissue. Further, the minimally invasive technique (mECL) was suggested to reduce pain, post-op discomfort, and procedure duration, and to accelerate the healing process. The mECL technique conveys a potential alternative approach as a sutureless, atraumatic, and less invasive technique that has been shown to increase patient satisfaction and comfort. In addition, using piezoelectric for osseous resection in this closed approach increases the favorable surgical outcomes. However, the osseous resection in mECL may be incomplete and results in a coronal rebound on the gingival contour. In addition, osseous resection in this approach is very technique sensitive to avoid root damage and uneven bone resection. A few studies and even a fewer clinical trials evaluated the clinical outcome of mECL using piezoelectric for osseous resection (PZ). Hence, in this randomized clinical trial, gingival margin and bone crest stability will be evaluated after a minimally invasive approach using piezoelectric (PZ) and a traditional open flap approach (OF).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Altered Passive Eruption of Teeth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Subjects' matching inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to control (OF) or tested (PZ) groups. After eligibility has been ascertained and consent has been obtained, subjects planned for ECL will be enrolled in the study and assigned to the group in 1:1 ratio using computer-generated block randomization scheme.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group: Crown lengthening using a traditional open-flap approach (OF).

Esthetic Crown lengthening done using a traditional open-flap approach (OF).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ECL-OF

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open Flap Technique (OF):

Gingivectomy and intra-sulcular incision will be carried out to remove strip of outlined marginal gingiva. Full mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated to preform ostectomy and/or osteoplasty until the desired distance achieved between the bone crest and the gingival margin. After achieving the new supracrestal distance, the flap will be sutured.

Test group: Crown lengthening using a minimally invasive approach by piezoelectric (PZ).

Esthetic Crown lengthening done using a minimally invasive approach using piezoelectric (PZ).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ECL- mPZ

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Flapless Technique using Piezoelectric (PZ):

Gingivectomy and intra-sulcular incision will be carried out to remove strip of outlined marginal gingiva. However, no flap will be reflected the osseous recontouring will be carried using special piezoelectric tip below gingival margin. The required distance between the bone crest and the gingival margin will be checked by inserting a periodontal probe into the incision below gingival margin.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ECL- mPZ

Flapless Technique using Piezoelectric (PZ):

Gingivectomy and intra-sulcular incision will be carried out to remove strip of outlined marginal gingiva. However, no flap will be reflected the osseous recontouring will be carried using special piezoelectric tip below gingival margin. The required distance between the bone crest and the gingival margin will be checked by inserting a periodontal probe into the incision below gingival margin.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ECL-OF

Open Flap Technique (OF):

Gingivectomy and intra-sulcular incision will be carried out to remove strip of outlined marginal gingiva. Full mucoperiosteal flap will be elevated to preform ostectomy and/or osteoplasty until the desired distance achieved between the bone crest and the gingival margin. After achieving the new supracrestal distance, the flap will be sutured.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a gummy smile due to APE (Type 1B) in two or more maxillary anterior teeth
* Patients with normal muscular efficiency of the upper lip
* Patients with no vertical skeletal defects

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with systemic condition that prevent periodontal surgery
* Patients who smoke
* Patients with previous periodontal surgery in the same area
* Pregnant women
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Augusta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed El-Awady

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ahmed El-Awady, BDS, MS, PHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Augusta University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Augusta University-Dental College of Georgia

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed El-Awady, BDS, MS, PHD

Role: CONTACT

706-721-5755

Jaspreet Farmaha, PHD

Role: CONTACT

706-721-1270

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ahmed El-Awady, BDS, MS, PhD

Role: primary

706-721-5755

Jaspreet Farmaha, PhD

Role: backup

7067211270

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1807704

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.