Biologically Guided Flap Stability: the Role of Periosteum Retention on the Performance of the Coronally Advanced Flap

NCT ID: NCT03417232

Last Updated: 2018-02-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-01

Study Completion Date

2015-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aim: to evaluate the possible benefit on wound healing and flap stability of periosteum inclusion, comparing a "split-full-split" thickness flap elevation versus a "split" thickness approach performed during CAF for the treatment of isolated-type gingival recessions in the upper jaw.

Material and Methods: forty patients were randomized, 20 were treated with "split-full-split" (test group) and 20 with a "split" approach (control group). Analyzed parameters at 1 year were: CRC, percentage of Recession Coverage (RC), Keratinized tissue (KT) gain, patient-related outcome measurements.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Treatment of buccal gingival recession (GR) is the common clinical requirement from patients who are mainly concerned about aesthetics. Noteworthy are also requests linked to root sensitivity, difficulty in oral hygiene procedures, presence of root caries and non-carious cervical lesions. GR defects, when left untreated, do not improve spontaneously and may progress toward increased recession depth (RD) and clinical attachment loss which increase the patient's aesthetic concern and the clinical discomfort due to augmented dental hypersensitivity.

Complete root coverage (CRC) can be considered the primary clinical outcome and selecting the surgical technique depends mainly on the local anatomical characteristics and on the patient's demands.

In patients with a residual amount of keratinized tissue apical to the recession defect, the coronal advanced flap (CAF) may be recommended. This surgical technique results in optimal root coverage, good color blending of the treated area with respect to adjacent soft tissues and a complete recovery of the original (pre-surgical) soft tissue marginal morphology. Furthermore, post-operative morbidity is reduced to a single area of surgical intervention and the overall chair time is limited.

When utilizing CAF technique, critical factors in CRC have been described in the literature. Flap positioning coronal to the CEJ and a tension-free flap design are among the most important ones. Moreover, flap thickness has been shown to influence the clinical outcomes of CAF procedure .

Coronally advanced flap has been widely validated by the literature for the treatment of single recession defects and, currently, different flap designs and technical modifications are available to clinicians.

De Sanctis and Zucchelli have recently introduced the "split-full-split" flap elevation modality. According to the authors, the modulation of flap thickness, produced by the inclusion of periosteum in the central area, increases flap thickness in the portion of the flap residing over the previously exposed avascular root surface. This, in turn, would give better stability to the flap. However, the partial-thickness flap approach is still commonly performed in the clinical practice and it is validated in the literature.

To date, evidence is still lacking on the influence of including the periosteum in the flap when compared with a split thickness approach in obtaining a CRC.

Thus, the aim of this double blind, controlled and randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the possible benefit on wound healing and flap stability of periosteum inclusion comparing a "split-full-split" flap elevation versus a "split" thickness approach when CAF is performed for the treatment of isolated-type gingival recessions in the upper jaw.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Recession, Localized

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Split Full Split Elevation of CAF

The central portion of the flap apical to the recession was elevated full thickness by the use of a small periostium elevator inserted into the probable sulcus

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CAF

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The design of the flap consisted of two horizontal beveled incisions (3mm in length) and two slightly oblique beveled incisions. The resulting trapezoidal-shaped flap was elevated in the coronal-apical direction. The suture of the flap started with two interrupted periosteal sutures performed at the most apical extension of the vertical releasing incisions; afterwards, it proceeded coronally with other interrupted sutures, each of them directed, from the flap to the adjacent buccal soft tissue, in the apical-coronal direction. The last sling suture allowed for the stabilization of the surgical papillae over the inter-dental connective tissue bed and allowed for a precise adaptation of the flap margin over the underlying convexity of the crown.

Split Elevation of CAF

The flap was fully elevated with a split thickness approach: the blade of the knife was inserted into the sulcus

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

CAF

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The design of the flap consisted of two horizontal beveled incisions (3mm in length) and two slightly oblique beveled incisions. The resulting trapezoidal-shaped flap was elevated in the coronal-apical direction. The suture of the flap started with two interrupted periosteal sutures performed at the most apical extension of the vertical releasing incisions; afterwards, it proceeded coronally with other interrupted sutures, each of them directed, from the flap to the adjacent buccal soft tissue, in the apical-coronal direction. The last sling suture allowed for the stabilization of the surgical papillae over the inter-dental connective tissue bed and allowed for a precise adaptation of the flap margin over the underlying convexity of the crown.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CAF

The design of the flap consisted of two horizontal beveled incisions (3mm in length) and two slightly oblique beveled incisions. The resulting trapezoidal-shaped flap was elevated in the coronal-apical direction. The suture of the flap started with two interrupted periosteal sutures performed at the most apical extension of the vertical releasing incisions; afterwards, it proceeded coronally with other interrupted sutures, each of them directed, from the flap to the adjacent buccal soft tissue, in the apical-coronal direction. The last sling suture allowed for the stabilization of the surgical papillae over the inter-dental connective tissue bed and allowed for a precise adaptation of the flap margin over the underlying convexity of the crown.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age \>18 years,
* no systemic diseases or pregnancy,
* smoking ≤10 cigarettes/day,
* full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score ≤20%,
* presence of at least one Miller class I or II isolated recession defect (Miller, 1985) in the upper jaw and at least 2 mm of keratinized tissue apical to the recession,
* recession depth (RD) equal to or greater than 2mm,
* identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ),
* vital teeth, free from caries or prosthetic crown,

Exclusion Criteria

* systemic diseases or pregnancy,
* history of periodontal surgery at experimental sites.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Siena

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Marco Ferrari

Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Massimo De Sanctis, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Siena

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Clementini M, Discepoli N, Danesi C, de Sanctis M. Biologically guided flap stability: the role of flap thickness including periosteum retention on the performance of the coronally advanced flap-A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Oct;45(10):1238-1246. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12998. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30099762 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAF0001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.