Subgingival Clamp Versus Retraction Cord in Cervical Lesions in Term of Technique Sensitivity and Gingival Health
NCT ID: NCT03917108
Last Updated: 2019-04-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-31
2019-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Different Gingival Retraction Systems on Gingival Displacement and Periodontal Health
NCT03892109
Influence of the Restorative Cervical Margin Placement on the Supracrestal Tissue Attachment
NCT04299347
Assessment of Lateral and Vertical Tissue Displacement Obtained by the Retraction Cord and Diode Laser
NCT04258696
Evaluation of Two Resin Composites and Two Adhesives for a Novel Restorative Protocol to Treat Cervical Lesions
NCT03215615
Evaluation of Gingival Displacement Methods
NCT07122297
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
They are effective and safe if the gingiva is healthy, also inexpensive retraction method. However, the use of retraction cord has some disadvantages like: it is time consuming, may cause gingival recession after healing and bleeding after removal, its application needs practice and skill as improper handling of the cord can cause traumatic injuries, gingival recession and marginal exposure of the restoration, it may cause postoperative discomfort and pain for the patient and finally leaving the retraction cord for long time or forgetting to remove it from the sulcus can cause permanent damage to the gingival tissue.
Using gingival retracting clamps with rubber dam isolation prevent the gap caused around the teeth due to vertical and horizontal tissue displacement occurred beneath the area of dento-gingival attachment upon the application of the retraction cord. Also, after clamp stabilization in position, it prevents accidental slippage and trauma to surrounding soft tissue during the restorative procedure. They also provide maximum tissue retraction without laceration of gingival tissues. Also, their availability in different sizes and shapes provide a good adaptation to any tooth configuration and any inaccessible area.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
retraction cord
retraction cord
retraction cord ( Ultra dent sizes #0, #00, #000 ) is placed in the gingival sulcus using blunt instrument and using cotton roll isolation.
subgingival clamp
subgingival clamp
subgingival clamp (KSK clamps W8A, #44, #42, #43) or (Brinker clamps B5, B6) is placed to retract the gingiva with rubber dam isolation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
retraction cord
retraction cord ( Ultra dent sizes #0, #00, #000 ) is placed in the gingival sulcus using blunt instrument and using cotton roll isolation.
subgingival clamp
subgingival clamp (KSK clamps W8A, #44, #42, #43) or (Brinker clamps B5, B6) is placed to retract the gingiva with rubber dam isolation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Males or females.
* Have at least one carious or non-carious cervical lesion.
* Cervical lesions should be equi-gingival or subgingival.
* Can comply to oral hygiene measures or with good oral hygiene.
* Have sufficient cognitive ability to understand consent procedures.
* Vital upper or lower teeth with no signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
* Clinically healthy gingiva and periodontium.
* No evidence of attachment loss, bleeding on probing, or plaque accumulation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Disabilities (mental health conditions, intellectual disability and physical disabilities).
* Systemic diseases or severe medically compromised. (Cardiovascular disorder, diabetes, -hypertensive, epileptic.
* Lack of compliance.
* Gingival hyperplasia, blood disorder.
* Attachment loss signs of periodontal disease.
* Patients contra-indicated for rubber dam placement (Asthmatic patient, mouth breather, -- partially erupted tooth, extremely malposed teeth and latex allergy).
* Periapical pathosis or signs of pulpal posterior or anterior pathology.
* Non-vital tooth.
* Endodontically treated tooth.
* Sever periodontal affection.
* Tooth indicated for extraction.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nada Hamada Ahmed Shehab Eldin
principal investigator in Cairo university
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
603
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.