Subgingival Clamp Versus Retraction Cord in Cervical Lesions in Term of Technique Sensitivity and Gingival Health

NCT ID: NCT03917108

Last Updated: 2019-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

assessing subgingival clamp in handling and retracting the gingival tissue at the cervical area to see its effect on the gingival health and its technique sensitivity compared to the most commonly used method (retraction cord), as gingival displacement for cervical restorations affects smile and therefore patient satisfaction with the result.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gingival displacement for restoring cervical lesions using retraction cord or subgingival clamp with their technique sensitivity affects the smile as they may cause gingival bleeding, laceration or recession and therefore affects patient satisfaction. There are several methods to achieve retraction; retraction cord is the most commonly used method. It controls the soft tissue displacement, gingival bleeding and expose the margins which provide good visualization and access.

They are effective and safe if the gingiva is healthy, also inexpensive retraction method. However, the use of retraction cord has some disadvantages like: it is time consuming, may cause gingival recession after healing and bleeding after removal, its application needs practice and skill as improper handling of the cord can cause traumatic injuries, gingival recession and marginal exposure of the restoration, it may cause postoperative discomfort and pain for the patient and finally leaving the retraction cord for long time or forgetting to remove it from the sulcus can cause permanent damage to the gingival tissue.

Using gingival retracting clamps with rubber dam isolation prevent the gap caused around the teeth due to vertical and horizontal tissue displacement occurred beneath the area of dento-gingival attachment upon the application of the retraction cord. Also, after clamp stabilization in position, it prevents accidental slippage and trauma to surrounding soft tissue during the restorative procedure. They also provide maximum tissue retraction without laceration of gingival tissues. Also, their availability in different sizes and shapes provide a good adaptation to any tooth configuration and any inaccessible area.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival Retraction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

retraction cord

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

retraction cord

Intervention Type DEVICE

retraction cord ( Ultra dent sizes #0, #00, #000 ) is placed in the gingival sulcus using blunt instrument and using cotton roll isolation.

subgingival clamp

Group Type OTHER

subgingival clamp

Intervention Type DEVICE

subgingival clamp (KSK clamps W8A, #44, #42, #43) or (Brinker clamps B5, B6) is placed to retract the gingiva with rubber dam isolation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

retraction cord

retraction cord ( Ultra dent sizes #0, #00, #000 ) is placed in the gingival sulcus using blunt instrument and using cotton roll isolation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

subgingival clamp

subgingival clamp (KSK clamps W8A, #44, #42, #43) or (Brinker clamps B5, B6) is placed to retract the gingiva with rubber dam isolation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject not less than 18 years of age.
* Males or females.
* Have at least one carious or non-carious cervical lesion.
* Cervical lesions should be equi-gingival or subgingival.
* Can comply to oral hygiene measures or with good oral hygiene.
* Have sufficient cognitive ability to understand consent procedures.
* Vital upper or lower teeth with no signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
* Clinically healthy gingiva and periodontium.
* No evidence of attachment loss, bleeding on probing, or plaque accumulation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients less than 18 years old.
* Disabilities (mental health conditions, intellectual disability and physical disabilities).
* Systemic diseases or severe medically compromised. (Cardiovascular disorder, diabetes, -hypertensive, epileptic.
* Lack of compliance.
* Gingival hyperplasia, blood disorder.
* Attachment loss signs of periodontal disease.
* Patients contra-indicated for rubber dam placement (Asthmatic patient, mouth breather, -- partially erupted tooth, extremely malposed teeth and latex allergy).
* Periapical pathosis or signs of pulpal posterior or anterior pathology.
* Non-vital tooth.
* Endodontically treated tooth.
* Sever periodontal affection.
* Tooth indicated for extraction.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nada Hamada Ahmed Shehab Eldin

principal investigator in Cairo university

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

603

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of Three Gingival Displacement Methods
NCT07282977 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA