"Clinical Evaluation of Retraction Cord Effectiveness Using Intraoral Scanner

NCT ID: NCT06447389

Last Updated: 2024-06-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-12-15

Study Completion Date

2024-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dental-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) have long been a commonly preferred treatment method for the rehabilitation of teeth with excessive substance loss and for addressing existing tooth deficiencies. Crucial factor affecting the success and quality of FPDs is the marginal fit of the restoration. Marginal discrepancy refers to the vertical or horizontal gap between the restoration finish line and the preparation finish line. To achieve high marginal fit restorations, gingival retraction techniques are used with the aim of removing the marginal gingiva away from the finish line. Retraction cords are commonly used for this purpose nowadays. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of retraction cords on the preparation finish line and the marginal fit of produced restorations using direct digital measurement methods.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is designed to produce temporary bridges based on two supporting teeth, fabricated using an intraoral scanner, and to evaluate the marginal fit of these bridges based on two different digital measurements obtained with and without the use of retraction cord on the patient.

The study will encompass patients with a single missing tooth in the posterior region of the lower or upper jaw, specifically involving the second premolar or first molar, planned for a three-unit tooth-supported fixed partial denture (SPP). Prior to preparation, patients will be examined for the assessment of the soft tissue around the teeth, and data collection will be conducted in accordance with the criteria outlined in Table-1, following the guidelines of the 2017 Consensus Report on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions regarding periodontal health and gingival diseases in healthy and reduced periodontium.

Subsequently, the abutment teeth will be prepared stepwise using high-speed rotary instruments and diamond preparation burs to accommodate fixed restorations.

The study groups will be formed considering the presence or absence of retraction application. The groups will be defined as Group I (No retraction cord) and Group II (Retraction cord present).

In Group I, digital impressions will be taken directly in all patients without placing a retraction cord.

In Group II, digital impressions will be taken in the same patients using a "000" knitted retraction cord and a single retraction cord technique.

As part of this plan, digital impressions of the abutment teeth for the temporary bridge will be taken both before and after the application of the retraction cord. The temporary bridges fabricated from these impressions will then be evaluated intraorally.

For each case included in the study, the .stl files from the initial impression for the restoration, the post-production impression, and the restoration itself will be superimposed and digitally analyzed using reverse engineering software.

The depths of the preparation finish lines will be recorded using a probe. The recorded depths of the preparation finish lines and the amounts of marginal discrepancy of the restorations will be examined together. Based on the obtained data, the effect of the preparation finish line depth on the marginal fit of the restorations will be evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prosthesis User Digitalism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

The investigator, who performed the statistical analysis, will not know which group the obtained primary and secondary data belong to until all evaluations are completed.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Retraction Cord

For each case, two tooth-supported restorations will be produced: one with and one without the application of a retraction cord. The accuracy of the marginal fit of the produced restorations will be determined through digital analysis of the data.

Group Type OTHER

retraction cordu (SURE-CORD®PLUS)

Intervention Type OTHER

The evaluation of the effectiveness of retraction cords in determining the restoration margin in the fabrication of short fixed partial dentures for patients with missing teeth.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

retraction cordu (SURE-CORD®PLUS)

The evaluation of the effectiveness of retraction cords in determining the restoration margin in the fabrication of short fixed partial dentures for patients with missing teeth.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Voluntary participation after reading and understanding the informed consent form.
* Over 18 years of age with no general health issues.
* Presence of a single missing posterior tooth in the upper or lower jaw.
* Possession of "clinical gingival health" in terms of periodontal condition ("Clinical gingival health of a healthy periodontium is defined as the absence of bleeding on probing, erythema, edema, symptoms, and no loss of bone or attachment.(17))
* Teeth with less than half of the tooth structure lost that do not require post-core treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Failure to accept voluntary participation in the study after reading the informed consent form.
* General health condition being unsuitable for prosthetic treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hacettepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kıvanç Akça

Prof. Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kıvanç Akça, DDS,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics Ankara, Turkey

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics

Ankara, Altındağ, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Acar O, Erkut S, Ozcelik TB, Ozdemir E, Akcil M. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 May;111(5):388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Dec 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24360008 (View on PubMed)

Martins FV, Santana RB, Fonseca EM. Efficacy of conventional cord versus cordless techniques for gingival displacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jan;125(1):46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.009. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32008797 (View on PubMed)

Mangano FG, Margiani B, Solop I, Latuta N, Admakin O. An Experimental Strategy for Capturing the Margins of Prepared Single Teeth with an Intraoral Scanner: A Prospective Clinical Study on 30 Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020392.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31936096 (View on PubMed)

Huang C, Somar M, Li K, Mohadeb JVN. Efficiency of Cordless Versus Cord Techniques of Gingival Retraction: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont. 2017 Apr;26(3):177-185. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12352. Epub 2015 Sep 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26378615 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KA-22056

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Efficacy of Three Gingival Displacement Methods
NCT07282977 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Hyaluronic Acid Gel in Ridge Preservation
NCT06176937 COMPLETED PHASE4