"Clinical Evaluation of Retraction Cord Effectiveness Using Intraoral Scanner
NCT ID: NCT06447389
Last Updated: 2024-06-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-12-15
2024-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Gingival Health Parameters in Hybrid CAD / CAM Crowns Produced After Different Retraction Processes
NCT03816930
The Impact of Retraction Cords on the Gingival Margin Level.
NCT05949073
Gingival Retraction for Digital Scan Data
NCT07119281
Evaluation of Different Gingival Retraction Systems on Gingival Displacement and Periodontal Health
NCT03892109
Subgingival Clamp Versus Retraction Cord in Cervical Lesions in Term of Technique Sensitivity and Gingival Health
NCT03917108
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study will encompass patients with a single missing tooth in the posterior region of the lower or upper jaw, specifically involving the second premolar or first molar, planned for a three-unit tooth-supported fixed partial denture (SPP). Prior to preparation, patients will be examined for the assessment of the soft tissue around the teeth, and data collection will be conducted in accordance with the criteria outlined in Table-1, following the guidelines of the 2017 Consensus Report on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions regarding periodontal health and gingival diseases in healthy and reduced periodontium.
Subsequently, the abutment teeth will be prepared stepwise using high-speed rotary instruments and diamond preparation burs to accommodate fixed restorations.
The study groups will be formed considering the presence or absence of retraction application. The groups will be defined as Group I (No retraction cord) and Group II (Retraction cord present).
In Group I, digital impressions will be taken directly in all patients without placing a retraction cord.
In Group II, digital impressions will be taken in the same patients using a "000" knitted retraction cord and a single retraction cord technique.
As part of this plan, digital impressions of the abutment teeth for the temporary bridge will be taken both before and after the application of the retraction cord. The temporary bridges fabricated from these impressions will then be evaluated intraorally.
For each case included in the study, the .stl files from the initial impression for the restoration, the post-production impression, and the restoration itself will be superimposed and digitally analyzed using reverse engineering software.
The depths of the preparation finish lines will be recorded using a probe. The recorded depths of the preparation finish lines and the amounts of marginal discrepancy of the restorations will be examined together. Based on the obtained data, the effect of the preparation finish line depth on the marginal fit of the restorations will be evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Retraction Cord
For each case, two tooth-supported restorations will be produced: one with and one without the application of a retraction cord. The accuracy of the marginal fit of the produced restorations will be determined through digital analysis of the data.
retraction cordu (SURE-CORD®PLUS)
The evaluation of the effectiveness of retraction cords in determining the restoration margin in the fabrication of short fixed partial dentures for patients with missing teeth.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
retraction cordu (SURE-CORD®PLUS)
The evaluation of the effectiveness of retraction cords in determining the restoration margin in the fabrication of short fixed partial dentures for patients with missing teeth.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Over 18 years of age with no general health issues.
* Presence of a single missing posterior tooth in the upper or lower jaw.
* Possession of "clinical gingival health" in terms of periodontal condition ("Clinical gingival health of a healthy periodontium is defined as the absence of bleeding on probing, erythema, edema, symptoms, and no loss of bone or attachment.(17))
* Teeth with less than half of the tooth structure lost that do not require post-core treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
* General health condition being unsuitable for prosthetic treatment.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hacettepe University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kıvanç Akça
Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kıvanç Akça, DDS,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics Ankara, Turkey
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
Ankara, Altındağ, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Acar O, Erkut S, Ozcelik TB, Ozdemir E, Akcil M. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 May;111(5):388-94. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
Martins FV, Santana RB, Fonseca EM. Efficacy of conventional cord versus cordless techniques for gingival displacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jan;125(1):46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.009. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
Mangano FG, Margiani B, Solop I, Latuta N, Admakin O. An Experimental Strategy for Capturing the Margins of Prepared Single Teeth with an Intraoral Scanner: A Prospective Clinical Study on 30 Patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 7;17(2):392. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020392.
Huang C, Somar M, Li K, Mohadeb JVN. Efficiency of Cordless Versus Cord Techniques of Gingival Retraction: A Systematic Review. J Prosthodont. 2017 Apr;26(3):177-185. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12352. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KA-22056
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.