Buccal Fat Pad vs. Palatal Rotation Scarf Grafts for Soft Tissue Management Around Zygomatic Implants

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Over the past 20 years, the demand for oral rehabilitation among edentulous patients has steadily increased. Traditionally, individuals with edentulous maxillae were treated using removable complete dentures. However, these often result in poor patient satisfaction due to instability and functional limitations. Dental rehabilitation with implants in the maxillary arch presents unique challenges, primarily due to the anatomical complexity of the maxilla and the need for adequate residual ridge dimensions for successful implant placement.

Following the extraction of maxillary teeth, patients experience rapid and progressive alveolar bone loss in both vertical and horizontal dimensions. This resorption is largely attributed to the absence of teeth and periodontal ligament fibers support, which are essential for transmitting mechanical forces that maintain bone homeostasis. In addition, the loss of maxillary molars accelerates pneumatization/expansion of the maxillary sinus, further reducing available bone volume. Contributing factors such as ill-fitting dentures and systemic health conditions can exacerbate this process, complicating implant placement even further.

To overcome these limitations, oral and maxillofacial surgeons have developed a range of advanced techniques, including tilted implants, sinus floor elevation, short implants, pterygoid implants, and most notably, zygomatic implants. Zygomatic implants bypass the atrophic alveolar ridge entirely by anchoring into the dense zygomatic bone, offering a reliable solution for patients with severely resorbed maxillae who are not candidates for conventional implant therapy.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Computer Guided Placement of Zygomatic Implants in Two Different Approaches

NCT06129695

Atrophic Maxilla Zygomatic Implants

RECRUITING NA

Clinical Evaluation of Interdental Papilla Reconstruction Using Injectable Autogenous Fat Versus Hyaluronic Acid Filler.

NCT05579522

Hyaluronic Acid Fat Graft

UNKNOWN NA

Soft Tissue Profile Following Socket Preservation With Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Free Gingival Graft

NCT03628170

Soft Tissue Mass

UNKNOWN NA

Evaluation of Soft Tissue Profile Changes Following Autogenous Fat or Onlay Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Augmentation Versus Sliding Genioplasty for Correction of Deficient Chin

NCT03747822

Patients With Deficient Chin

UNKNOWN PHASE3

Effect of Hyaluronic Acid, With Demineralized Tooth Graft, in Socket Preservation, vs Demineralized Tooth Graft Alone.

NCT05613075

Alveolar Bone Resorption Socket Preservation Bone Resorption +1 more

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study aims to compare two different soft tissue augmentation techniques-buccal fat pad graft and palatal rotation scarf graft-to determine which method is more effective in enhancing soft tissue volume, improving tissue stability, and preventing dehiscence around zygomatic implants. Both grafts have shown promise in separate clinical applications, but this head-to-head comparison it will help in identifying the more optimal and predictable graft technique, the research aims to improve clinical outcomes, reduce complications, and enhance the long-term success of zygomatic implants in challenging clinical scenarios.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Zygomatic Implants Atrophic Maxilla Soft Tissue Defect Soft Tissue Healing

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

1. Superiority test.
2. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
3. Parallel group study.
4. Allocation Ratio 1:1.

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Each patient will be given a code by the researcher and the observers will be blind to which group this case belong. Patients, radiographic outcome assessor and statistician will be blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Zygomatic implants placed using ZAGA approach & Buccal Fat Pad

All patients involved in this study will be divided into two groups, each group will receive Zygomatic implants (Exteriorized ZAGA approach) alone (dual bilateral, quad) or in combination with axial implants if bone permits(hybrid). The first group (Control Group) will be treated with the buccal pad of fat graft, while the other (Study Group) is going to be treated by the palatal scarf graft after implant placement.

BFP has a long successful history in oral surgery for its use in closure of Oroantral communication and taking advantage of the fact that it contains progenitor stem cells showing similar phenotype with (ASC) adipose-derived stem cells characteristics, which can similarly differentiate into the chondrogenic, adipogenic, or osteogenic lineage. Making them an invaluable reservoir for tissue engineering.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Buccal Fat Pad

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

BFP has a long successful history in oral surgery for its use in closure of Oroantral communication and taking advantage of the fact that it contains progenitor stem cells showing similar phenotype with (ASC) adipose-derived stem cells characteristics, which can similarly differentiate into the chondrogenic, adipogenic, or osteogenic lineage. Making them an invaluable reservoir for tissue engineering.

Zygomatic implants placed using ZAGA approach & Palatal Rotation Scarf Graft

All patients involved in this study will be divided into two groups, each group will receive Zygomatic implants (Exteriorized ZAGA approach) alone (dual bilateral, quad) or in combination with axial implants if bone permits(hybrid). The first group (Control Group) will be treated with the buccal pad of fat graft, while the other (Study Group) is going to be treated by the palatal scarf graft after implant placement.

This technique uses tissue from the palatal area, which has a rich blood supply placed around the neck of the zygomatic implant aiming to protect the mucosal tissues buccal to the exteriorized implants from capillary compression and subsequent soft tissue recession. The palatal rotation scarf graft has been proven to provide a robust, resilient soft tissue flap with good potential for long-term stability and esthetic outcomes around implants

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Palatal Rotation Scarf Graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This technique uses tissue from the palatal area, which has a rich blood supply placed around the neck of the zygomatic implant aiming to protect the mucosal tissues buccal to the exteriorized implants from capillary compression and subsequent soft tissue recession. The palatal rotation scarf graft has been proven to provide a robust, resilient soft tissue flap with good potential for long-term stability and esthetic outcomes around implants.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Buccal Fat Pad

BFP has a long successful history in oral surgery for its use in closure of Oroantral communication and taking advantage of the fact that it contains progenitor stem cells showing similar phenotype with (ASC) adipose-derived stem cells characteristics, which can similarly differentiate into the chondrogenic, adipogenic, or osteogenic lineage. Making them an invaluable reservoir for tissue engineering.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Palatal Rotation Scarf Graft

This technique uses tissue from the palatal area, which has a rich blood supply placed around the neck of the zygomatic implant aiming to protect the mucosal tissues buccal to the exteriorized implants from capillary compression and subsequent soft tissue recession. The palatal rotation scarf graft has been proven to provide a robust, resilient soft tissue flap with good potential for long-term stability and esthetic outcomes around implants.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Buccal pad of fat BFP Scarf Graft Palatal pedicled graft Palatal graft flap

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient of age 18 years or more, who can understand and sign an informed consent.
2. Patients with severely atrophic edentulous upper arch (Cawood \& Howell class IV, V, VI) that could not be restored by standard axial implants without augmentation.
3. Patients with severely atrophic edentulous upper arch (Bedrossian classification inadequate bone in zones II or III or all three zones) that could not be restored by standard axial implants without augmentation.
4. Good systemic health (ASA score I-II)
5. Highly motivated patients with good compliance to oral hygiene habits.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with cardiovascular disease or pulmonary disease or medical systemic condition that does not permit the surgical procedure under general anesthesia (ASA III, IV, V and VI).
2. Patients with conditions contraindicating implant placement (e.g.: radiation to the head and neck, intra-venous bisphosphonates, uncontrolled Diabetes mellitus).
3. Heavy smokers. (\> 20 cigarettes daily)
4. Patient with psychiatric problems, severe bruxism, or other parafunctional habits.
5. Acute maxillary sinus infection or untreated maxillary sinus cyst.
6. Malignancy or pathology in Maxilla or Zygoma.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No