Experimental Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI) to Treat Infertile Couples

NCT ID: NCT04298255

Last Updated: 2025-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-24

Study Completion Date

2026-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate if special types of cells called round spermatids can be gathered from men with non-obstructive azoospermia and used (in absence of elongated spermatids and spermatozoa) to reliably and effectively create pregnancy with a procedure called Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI). This process is similar to In Vitro Fertilization, or 'IVF'. In addition, this study wants to test the safety of ROSI and see what effects (good and bad) it has on embryo created from this method.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Azoospermia is defined as the absence of sperm in the ejaculate. Around 1% of general population suffers from azoospermia. Men who were rendered infertile due to a non-obstructive azoospermia, who have been subjected to Testicular Sperm Extraction (TESE) surgery and found to be lacking elongated spermatids or spermatozoa, are commonly advised to consider utilizing a sperm donor or apply for adoption. It is reported that \~30% of men with non-obstructive azoospermia lack elongated spermatids and spermatozoa but may still produce round spermatids (less mature form of haploid germ cells) in their testicles. Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI) technology to fertilize oocytes is not a brand-new technology, however, it is plagued with notoriously low efficiency. Despite this limitation, it has been reported that most of these patients still desire to have the ROSI procedure instead of applying directly for other options, i.e. sperm donation or adoption.

High failure rate of traditional ROSI has been attributed to a few potential causes:

1. Incorrect selection of round spermatids (to distinguish from diploid spermatogonia cells)
2. Using round spermatids that were already in the process of degeneration
3. Incomplete imprinting in the round spermatid
4. Incomplete activation of oocytes Recently Tanaka and colleagues in Japan established a new ROSI method and reported over 90 babies born via this method1. They described a new method of round spermatid selection and oocyte activation using NEPA21 super electroporator (10 minutes prior to round spermatid injection).

Babies born from this new ROSI method in Japan have been evaluated for developmental and cognitive differences for 2 years1. Babies conceived with ROSI were found to have a shorter gestation times, and lower body weight at 12 and 18 months when compared to their naturally conceived counterparts, but also showed an increased birth weight and showed no body weight differences at 24 months of age. No diseases resulting from genetic anomalies have been reported thus far, but the relatively small sample sizes present in the literature needs to be tested in larger cohorts. Therefore, this effective ROSI method should still be considered as an "experimental fertility treatment".

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility, Male

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Infertile Male with round spermatid (but not elongated spermatids and spermatozoa) in their testes. Couples can choose either option 1 or 2.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ROSI only

Option 1: injecting extracted round spermatids (less mature form of haploid germ cells than elongated spermatid or spermatozoon) from male partner into the harvested egg of a female partner

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI)

Intervention Type OTHER

In Vitro Fertilization using Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI)

Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization

Option 2: Harvested eggs from the female partner will be separated in two groups, with one group being fertilized with round spermatids and the other group fertilized with donor sperm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization

Intervention Type OTHER

Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI)

In Vitro Fertilization using Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI)

Intervention Type OTHER

Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization

Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males with no elongated spermatids or spermatozoa present but with round spermatids present on TESE (Testicular Sperm Extraction)
* Male diagnosed with non-obstructive Azoospermia
* Male partner ≥18
* Female partner greater than 18 years of age and less than 38 years of age or Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) greater than 2 ng/ml.

Exclusion Criteria

* Males with obstructive azoospermia
* Males with presence an adequate number of elongated spermatids or spermatozoa
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Carolinas Fertility Institute (CFI)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine (WFIRM)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wake Forest Department of Urology

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hooman Sadri, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine (WFIRM)

Hooman Sadri, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Carolinas Fertility Institute (CFI)

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Karla M Oliver

Role: CONTACT

336-713-3123

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tanaka A, Suzuki K, Nagayoshi M, Tanaka A, Takemoto Y, Watanabe S, Takeda S, Irahara M, Kuji N, Yamagata Z, Yanagimachi R. Ninety babies born after round spermatid injection into oocytes: survey of their development from fertilization to 2 years of age. Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.033.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30098696 (View on PubMed)

Tanaka A, Nagayoshi M, Takemoto Y, Tanaka I, Kusunoki H, Watanabe S, Kuroda K, Takeda S, Ito M, Yanagimachi R. Fourteen babies born after round spermatid injection into human oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 24;112(47):14629-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517466112. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26575628 (View on PubMed)

Bradshaw AW, Nikmehr B, Halicigil C, Stogner-Underwood K, Sadri-Ardekani H. Optimum identification of round spermatid in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: A commentary. Andrology. 2021 Nov;9(6):1817-1818. doi: 10.1111/andr.13113. Epub 2021 Oct 14. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34618410 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00062898

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.