Experimental Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI) to Treat Infertile Couples
NCT ID: NCT04298255
Last Updated: 2025-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-08-24
2026-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Round Spermatid Injection Protocol
NCT04053309
Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing ICSI to Insemination for Non-Male Factor Patients Undergoing PGT-A
NCT05548101
Retrieval of Sperm From Men With Azoospermia Using Ultrasound-guided Rete Testis Aspiration
NCT03291522
IMSI in Couples With Previous Implantation Failures
NCT02107521
Laser-Assisted Versus Conventional Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
NCT00114725
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
High failure rate of traditional ROSI has been attributed to a few potential causes:
1. Incorrect selection of round spermatids (to distinguish from diploid spermatogonia cells)
2. Using round spermatids that were already in the process of degeneration
3. Incomplete imprinting in the round spermatid
4. Incomplete activation of oocytes Recently Tanaka and colleagues in Japan established a new ROSI method and reported over 90 babies born via this method1. They described a new method of round spermatid selection and oocyte activation using NEPA21 super electroporator (10 minutes prior to round spermatid injection).
Babies born from this new ROSI method in Japan have been evaluated for developmental and cognitive differences for 2 years1. Babies conceived with ROSI were found to have a shorter gestation times, and lower body weight at 12 and 18 months when compared to their naturally conceived counterparts, but also showed an increased birth weight and showed no body weight differences at 24 months of age. No diseases resulting from genetic anomalies have been reported thus far, but the relatively small sample sizes present in the literature needs to be tested in larger cohorts. Therefore, this effective ROSI method should still be considered as an "experimental fertility treatment".
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ROSI only
Option 1: injecting extracted round spermatids (less mature form of haploid germ cells than elongated spermatid or spermatozoon) from male partner into the harvested egg of a female partner
Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI)
In Vitro Fertilization using Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI)
Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization
Option 2: Harvested eggs from the female partner will be separated in two groups, with one group being fertilized with round spermatids and the other group fertilized with donor sperm
Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization
Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI)
In Vitro Fertilization using Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI)
Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization
Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male diagnosed with non-obstructive Azoospermia
* Male partner ≥18
* Female partner greater than 18 years of age and less than 38 years of age or Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) greater than 2 ng/ml.
Exclusion Criteria
* Males with presence an adequate number of elongated spermatids or spermatozoa
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Carolinas Fertility Institute (CFI)
UNKNOWN
Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine (WFIRM)
UNKNOWN
Wake Forest Department of Urology
UNKNOWN
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hooman Sadri, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine (WFIRM)
Hooman Sadri, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carolinas Fertility Institute (CFI)
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tanaka A, Suzuki K, Nagayoshi M, Tanaka A, Takemoto Y, Watanabe S, Takeda S, Irahara M, Kuji N, Yamagata Z, Yanagimachi R. Ninety babies born after round spermatid injection into oocytes: survey of their development from fertilization to 2 years of age. Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.033.
Tanaka A, Nagayoshi M, Takemoto Y, Tanaka I, Kusunoki H, Watanabe S, Kuroda K, Takeda S, Ito M, Yanagimachi R. Fourteen babies born after round spermatid injection into human oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 24;112(47):14629-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517466112. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
Bradshaw AW, Nikmehr B, Halicigil C, Stogner-Underwood K, Sadri-Ardekani H. Optimum identification of round spermatid in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: A commentary. Andrology. 2021 Nov;9(6):1817-1818. doi: 10.1111/andr.13113. Epub 2021 Oct 14. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00062898
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.