Fertility Preservation in Male AYA With Cancer

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

53 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-08

Study Completion Date

2025-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Very little is known about how medical providers can help adolescent and young adults (AYAs) and their caregivers make decisions about fertility preservation (sperm banking) before beginning cancer treatment. The purpose of this study is to see if having a guided conversation about fertility preservation increases preservation rates and/or satisfaction with the decision among AYA males with cancer. The primary hypothesis is that compared to standard of care control group (routine fertility consult at diagnosis, n=20), AYAs in the intervention arm (routine fertility consult at diagnosis + FP Decision Tool and Facilitated Conversation by trained interventionist) will have higher rates of FP uptake. The secondary hypothesis is that families in the intervention group will report better FP decision quality compared to those in the control arm.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Sperm Banking Among Adolescents Newly Diagnosed With Cancer: Development of a Profiling and Referral Tool

NCT01152268

Cancer

COMPLETED

Male Fertility and Sperm Cryopreservation

NCT02431000

Fertility SPERM Cancer

WITHDRAWN

Fertility Preservation in Prepubertal Boys: An Experimental Approach

NCT02529826

Oncology [See Also, Affected System]

UNKNOWN NA

Male Fertility Preservation Using Cryopreservation of Testicular Tissue Before Highly Gonadotoxic Cancer Treatment

NCT03180918

Childhood Cancer Fertility Disorders

RECRUITING NA

Decisional Process in Male Fertility Preservation

NCT02411214

Infertility Quality of Life Cancer

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A rapidly growing population of male childhood cancer survivors are at risk for infertility and distress. As the number of male cancer survivors rises, it is essential to minimize treatment late effects. One of the most prevalent and significant complications among males is infertility, which can impair psychosocial development and reduce quality of life. National guidelines emphasize offering fertility preservation (FP) prior to initiation of cancer therapy, and sperm cryopreservation is an established and generally noninvasive FP method for pubertal males. Early research suggested only males receiving high doses of alkylating agents should bank sperm. However, variable sperm counts following equivalent doses of cyclophosphamide and scenarios in which patients have to move quickly from "low risk" treatments (which transiently impair sperm production) to "high risk" treatments, support the premise that all males receiving chemotherapy and/or gonadal radiation should consider FP at diagnosis. Despite studies showing \~50% of male childhood cancer survivors have fertility impairment, reports from many centers show only \~25% of pubertal males bank sperm prior to treatment. As survivors enter their reproductive years, many regret missed opportunities for FP and experience distress about potential infertility. Thus, interventions to improve FP uptake would have great potential for reproductive and psychological benefit.

Individual and family factors associated with sperm banking decisions remain poorly understood. Young age, cost, inadequate knowledge, and urgency to start treatment are common barriers to FP among AYA males with newly diagnosed cancer. As a result, most fertility counseling and FP interventions have targeted healthcare providers and systems or provider-patient interactions. While these are critical factors, less than half of male AYA advised about FP in a recent study actually banked sperm, indicating knowledge is not sufficient.

The purpose of this study is to test a decision tool and accompanying guided discussion as a method of improving decision making regarding FP, compared to a standard of care fertility consult.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility, Male

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Families will be randomly assigned to receive standard care or to receive standard care plus the investigator's study intervention. All families will then be followed for a year to assess outcomes.

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Participants, the interventionist, and research staff will not be blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard of Care (Control)

Participants will receive a standard of care fertility consult.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

FP Decision Tool and Discussion (Treatment)

Participants will receive a standard of care fertility consult and will participate in a family-centered psychoeducational intervention consisting of completing a FP Decision Tool and participating in a guided discussion about responses and discrepancies identified in the FP Decision Tool.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FP Decision Tool and Discussion

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention will be administered by a trained interventionist. The interventionist will administer the digital FP Decision Tool to families in the intervention arm. The tool asks questions examining each AYA's thoughts or feelings regarding parenthood and fertility preservation. The parent version asks the same questions, plus additional questions asking the parent to rate their son's feelings on certain topics (i.e., whether their son wants to have a child, whether their son would be as happy with an adopted child versus a biological child). Items are coded based on the domains of the Health Belief Model (perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived threats, self-efficacy, and cues to action). Items are scored and the trained interventionist will facilitate a guided discussion based on the family's responses and discrepancies.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FP Decision Tool and Discussion

The intervention will be administered by a trained interventionist. The interventionist will administer the digital FP Decision Tool to families in the intervention arm. The tool asks questions examining each AYA's thoughts or feelings regarding parenthood and fertility preservation. The parent version asks the same questions, plus additional questions asking the parent to rate their son's feelings on certain topics (i.e., whether their son wants to have a child, whether their son would be as happy with an adopted child versus a biological child). Items are coded based on the domains of the Health Belief Model (perceived benefits, perceived barriers, perceived threats, self-efficacy, and cues to action). Items are scored and the trained interventionist will facilitate a guided discussion based on the family's responses and discrepancies.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male
* Aged 12-25 years
* Expected to have adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and/or gonadal radiation) for newly diagnosed cancer
* Pubertal (at least Tanner stage 2-3, eligible for sperm banking as determined in the fertility consult)
* Proficient in English