Reinforced PTFE Meshes Versus Customized Titanium Meshes
NCT ID: NCT04257097
Last Updated: 2025-03-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-01
2025-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-resorbable Membranes Versus Titanium Meshes and Resorbable Membranes
NCT04332679
Three-dimensional Bone Regeneration Using Custom-made Meshes With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT04286334
Efficacy and Safety of Additive Manufacturing Personalized Titanium Mesh in Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT06692244
Guided Bone Regeneration With Customized Titanium Meshes
NCT04480073
10 Year Follow up of RCT Comparing Different Regenerative Regenerative Procedures
NCT05225142
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study aims to evaluate, in cases of maxillary and mandibular atrophies characterized by a vertical and / or combined resorption of the alveolar bone, the complication rate (intra- and post-operative) and the three-dimensional bone gain after traditional bone regeneration, where the medical device necessary for bone regeneration is cut out, shaped, and manually modelled by the operator, compared to digital bone regeneration. Subsequently, the medical device is digitally designed and made with a computerized method.
The primary objective of the study is, therefore, the evaluation of the healing complications; in particular, the early or delayed exposure of medical devices used for bone regeneration, during the healing period. This exposure is, as reported in all clinical studies, the main cause of the failure of the surgery.
A secondary objective, is the quantitative assessment of bone regeneration obtained by the 2 techniques. In particular, the evaluation of the reconstructed bone volume (RBV) with respect to the planned bone volume (PBV).
Other targets include the qualitative evaluation of bone regeneration through histological and histomorphometric analysis of the bone biopsies obtained at the moment that the medical device is removed and finally the evaluation of the peri-implant bone resorption will be conducted over time.
This clinical trial, which is promoted by Prof. Giuseppe Corinaldesi and the Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, is designed as a pilot, randomized, multicentric, independent, parallel-group clinical trial, in which the all variables will be analysed prospectively.
The study will have a selection and enrolment period of approximately 12 months and a treatment period of approximately 24 months. As a result, the overall duration of the study will be approximately 36 months.
Over the three-year period 2019/2021, it will include the treatment of 50 patients in good general health conditions who are affected by partial edentulism of the maxilla or mandible with vertical and horizontal resorption of the alveolar bone, which requires a prosthetic rehabilitation supported by implants to improve function and aesthetics of edentulous areas.
Patients will be divided into 2 study groups, according to the previously computer-generated randomization sequence the following will be assigned to each group: group A (control), 25 patients who will be treated with bone regeneration with titanium-reinforced PTFE mesh, shaped and manually modelled by the operator during surgery; group B (test), 25 patients will be treated with bone regeneration with titanium mesh, designed and produced before surgery.
The study will include 3 different treatment phases: the first phase (T0) involves bone regeneration using a standard technique (group A) or digital technique (group B); the second one (T1), subsequently, after 6 months, this will forsee the removal of the regeneration devices and the insertion of the implants; the third (T2), 3 months after the aforementioned, will forsee the final functional loading of the implants, with a consequent follow-up of the regenerated bone.
All the materials and tools that will be used in the study are CE certified (with the exception of the custom-made mesh which, as a custom-made device, does not require CE certification) and have already been used in the normal care path for patients who have undergone bone regeneration. Moreover, the control visits and the radiological investigations of the data foreseen by the aforementioned protocol will be collected; They will be summarized in the case report form (CRF), and are those that characterize the normal care path of patients undergoing necessary bone regeneration for prosthetic implant rehabilitation when the bone quantity is insufficient.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the non-inferiority of technique B (digital technique) compared to technique A (traditional technique) in the incidence of complications.
The Secondary objectives include: assessment of patient and operator benefits, reconstructed bone volume (RBV) compared to planned bone volume (PBV), histological and histomorphometric analysis of bone quality obtained and peri-implant bone resorption after 12 months of follow-up.
The sample size necessary to support the null hypothesis is 17 subjects for each group. In order to compensate for any protocol deviations or possible drop-outs, the number of patients was increased to 25 per group.
The results obtained in the two study groups will be subjected to descriptive statistical analysis and the differences between groups will be tested by means of appropriate statistical tests for purely exploratory and non-demonstrative purposes.
The patient will be considered as the statistical unit of the analysis, and the statistical significance will be set at α = 0.05.
The collected data will be grouped and summarized with respect to the demographic, anamnestic, and clinical variables of each patient.
Exploratory analyses will be performed using descriptive statistics. The data will be presented both for the intent-to-treat population and for the per-protocol population.
The sample size necessary to support the null hypothesis is 17 subjects for each group. In order to compensate for any protocol deviations or possible drop-outs, the number of patients was increased to 25 per group. The sample size was calculated using dedicated statistical software (STATA, StataCorp LLC) through Pearson's chi-squared test, guaranteeing a level of significance of 95% and a power of 80%.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A - control group
25 patients will undergo bone regeneration with a titanium reinforced PTFE Mesh (RPM - Osteogenics Lubbock Texas USA), manually shaped and modeled by the operator during surgery (traditional technique), covered with collagen membranes of medium-rapid resorption (Vitala - Osteogenics Lubbock Texas USA)
RPM - Osteogenics Lubbock Texas USA
25 patients will undergo bone regeneration with a reinforced PTFE mesh, manually shaped and modelled by the operator during surgery (traditional technique), covered with collagen membranes of medium-rapid resorption
Group B - Test group
25 patients undergo bone regeneration with a custom-made titanium mesh (Yxoss CBR - Reoss Filderstadt Germany), digitally designed by an operator before the surgery (digital technique), covered by collagen membranes with medium-rapid resorption (Bio-Gide - Geistlich Baden Baden Germany)
Yxoss CBR - Reoss Filderstadt Germany
25 patients undergo bone regeneration with a custom-made titanium mesh, digitally designed by an operator before the surgery (digital technique), covered by collagen membranes with medium-rapid resorption
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
RPM - Osteogenics Lubbock Texas USA
25 patients will undergo bone regeneration with a reinforced PTFE mesh, manually shaped and modelled by the operator during surgery (traditional technique), covered with collagen membranes of medium-rapid resorption
Yxoss CBR - Reoss Filderstadt Germany
25 patients undergo bone regeneration with a custom-made titanium mesh, digitally designed by an operator before the surgery (digital technique), covered by collagen membranes with medium-rapid resorption
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with partial edentulism of the maxilla or mandible, with a 2mm minimum to a 12mm maximum vertical bone defect, which requires a three-dimensional bone regeneration intervention in order to have a fixed implant supported rehabilitation.
* Obtaining informed consent for experimental treatment and processing the personal data.
Exclusion Criteria
* Untreated periodontal disease
* Smoking habit\> 10 cigarettes / day;
* Abuse of alcohol or drugs
* Pregnancy
* Patients with odontostomatological infections and / or systemic infections in progress;
* Patient with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or other metabolic diseases;
* Patients with severe changes in liver and kidney function.
* Patients with confirmed uncontrolled autoimmune disorders.
* Patients subjected radiation therapy in the head or neck region in the last 5 years.
* Patients undergoing immunosuppressive and / or immunocompromised therapy.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
GBR Academy
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alessandro Cucchi
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Giuseppe Corinaldesi, MD,DDS,MS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
School of dentistry - University of Bologna
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
School of Dentistry - University of Bologna
Bologna, Italy, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CMF 01/2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.