Reinforced PTFE Meshes Versus Customized Titanium Meshes

NCT ID: NCT04257097

Last Updated: 2025-03-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-01

Study Completion Date

2025-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to compare two surgical techniques for the treatment of the maxillary and mandibular bone atrophies.. Therefore, the main purpose is to compare the (i) the percentage of post-operative complications (ii) the three-dimensional bone gain with customized titanium meshes (test group - the medical device is digitally designed and made with customized laser sintering modality, customized to the defect of each patient) and with titanium-reinforced PTFE mesh (control group - the medical device is cut, shaped, and manually modelled to the patient's defect by the operator himself.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The rationale of the study is based on the fact that manual intra-operative modelling of a titanium-reinforced PTFE mesh is operator-dependent, and even in the case of very experienced operators it is always difficult, inaccurate and slow. The use of pre-modelled and pre-fabricated custom-made meshes with bevel margins and three-dimensional morphology adapted to the bone defect, would make it possible to carry out an important bone regeneration as it reduces the operating times, the risks linked to mesh borders, trauma to the soft tissues and the discomfort for the patient.

This study aims to evaluate, in cases of maxillary and mandibular atrophies characterized by a vertical and / or combined resorption of the alveolar bone, the complication rate (intra- and post-operative) and the three-dimensional bone gain after traditional bone regeneration, where the medical device necessary for bone regeneration is cut out, shaped, and manually modelled by the operator, compared to digital bone regeneration. Subsequently, the medical device is digitally designed and made with a computerized method.

The primary objective of the study is, therefore, the evaluation of the healing complications; in particular, the early or delayed exposure of medical devices used for bone regeneration, during the healing period. This exposure is, as reported in all clinical studies, the main cause of the failure of the surgery.

A secondary objective, is the quantitative assessment of bone regeneration obtained by the 2 techniques. In particular, the evaluation of the reconstructed bone volume (RBV) with respect to the planned bone volume (PBV).

Other targets include the qualitative evaluation of bone regeneration through histological and histomorphometric analysis of the bone biopsies obtained at the moment that the medical device is removed and finally the evaluation of the peri-implant bone resorption will be conducted over time.

This clinical trial, which is promoted by Prof. Giuseppe Corinaldesi and the Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, is designed as a pilot, randomized, multicentric, independent, parallel-group clinical trial, in which the all variables will be analysed prospectively.

The study will have a selection and enrolment period of approximately 12 months and a treatment period of approximately 24 months. As a result, the overall duration of the study will be approximately 36 months.

Over the three-year period 2019/2021, it will include the treatment of 50 patients in good general health conditions who are affected by partial edentulism of the maxilla or mandible with vertical and horizontal resorption of the alveolar bone, which requires a prosthetic rehabilitation supported by implants to improve function and aesthetics of edentulous areas.

Patients will be divided into 2 study groups, according to the previously computer-generated randomization sequence the following will be assigned to each group: group A (control), 25 patients who will be treated with bone regeneration with titanium-reinforced PTFE mesh, shaped and manually modelled by the operator during surgery; group B (test), 25 patients will be treated with bone regeneration with titanium mesh, designed and produced before surgery.

The study will include 3 different treatment phases: the first phase (T0) involves bone regeneration using a standard technique (group A) or digital technique (group B); the second one (T1), subsequently, after 6 months, this will forsee the removal of the regeneration devices and the insertion of the implants; the third (T2), 3 months after the aforementioned, will forsee the final functional loading of the implants, with a consequent follow-up of the regenerated bone.

All the materials and tools that will be used in the study are CE certified (with the exception of the custom-made mesh which, as a custom-made device, does not require CE certification) and have already been used in the normal care path for patients who have undergone bone regeneration. Moreover, the control visits and the radiological investigations of the data foreseen by the aforementioned protocol will be collected; They will be summarized in the case report form (CRF), and are those that characterize the normal care path of patients undergoing necessary bone regeneration for prosthetic implant rehabilitation when the bone quantity is insufficient.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the non-inferiority of technique B (digital technique) compared to technique A (traditional technique) in the incidence of complications.

The Secondary objectives include: assessment of patient and operator benefits, reconstructed bone volume (RBV) compared to planned bone volume (PBV), histological and histomorphometric analysis of bone quality obtained and peri-implant bone resorption after 12 months of follow-up.

The sample size necessary to support the null hypothesis is 17 subjects for each group. In order to compensate for any protocol deviations or possible drop-outs, the number of patients was increased to 25 per group.

The results obtained in the two study groups will be subjected to descriptive statistical analysis and the differences between groups will be tested by means of appropriate statistical tests for purely exploratory and non-demonstrative purposes.

The patient will be considered as the statistical unit of the analysis, and the statistical significance will be set at α = 0.05.

The collected data will be grouped and summarized with respect to the demographic, anamnestic, and clinical variables of each patient.

Exploratory analyses will be performed using descriptive statistics. The data will be presented both for the intent-to-treat population and for the per-protocol population.

The sample size necessary to support the null hypothesis is 17 subjects for each group. In order to compensate for any protocol deviations or possible drop-outs, the number of patients was increased to 25 per group. The sample size was calculated using dedicated statistical software (STATA, StataCorp LLC) through Pearson's chi-squared test, guaranteeing a level of significance of 95% and a power of 80%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgical Procedure, Unspecified Soft Tissue Infections Surgical Wound Dehiscence Bone Density Bone Loss Dental Implant Failed

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
The surgeon is masked until the envelope is opened at the time of the surgery.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A - control group

25 patients will undergo bone regeneration with a titanium reinforced PTFE Mesh (RPM - Osteogenics Lubbock Texas USA), manually shaped and modeled by the operator during surgery (traditional technique), covered with collagen membranes of medium-rapid resorption (Vitala - Osteogenics Lubbock Texas USA)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

RPM - Osteogenics Lubbock Texas USA

Intervention Type DEVICE

25 patients will undergo bone regeneration with a reinforced PTFE mesh, manually shaped and modelled by the operator during surgery (traditional technique), covered with collagen membranes of medium-rapid resorption

Group B - Test group

25 patients undergo bone regeneration with a custom-made titanium mesh (Yxoss CBR - Reoss Filderstadt Germany), digitally designed by an operator before the surgery (digital technique), covered by collagen membranes with medium-rapid resorption (Bio-Gide - Geistlich Baden Baden Germany)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Yxoss CBR - Reoss Filderstadt Germany

Intervention Type DEVICE

25 patients undergo bone regeneration with a custom-made titanium mesh, digitally designed by an operator before the surgery (digital technique), covered by collagen membranes with medium-rapid resorption

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

RPM - Osteogenics Lubbock Texas USA

25 patients will undergo bone regeneration with a reinforced PTFE mesh, manually shaped and modelled by the operator during surgery (traditional technique), covered with collagen membranes of medium-rapid resorption

Intervention Type DEVICE

Yxoss CBR - Reoss Filderstadt Germany

25 patients undergo bone regeneration with a custom-made titanium mesh, digitally designed by an operator before the surgery (digital technique), covered by collagen membranes with medium-rapid resorption

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Vitala - Osteogenics Lubbock Texas USA Bio-Gide - Geistlich Baden Baden Germany

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Adult patients, over the age of 18, in good general health.

* Patients with partial edentulism of the maxilla or mandible, with a 2mm minimum to a 12mm maximum vertical bone defect, which requires a three-dimensional bone regeneration intervention in order to have a fixed implant supported rehabilitation.
* Obtaining informed consent for experimental treatment and processing the personal data.

Exclusion Criteria

* Poor oral hygiene,

* Untreated periodontal disease
* Smoking habit\> 10 cigarettes / day;
* Abuse of alcohol or drugs
* Pregnancy
* Patients with odontostomatological infections and / or systemic infections in progress;
* Patient with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or other metabolic diseases;
* Patients with severe changes in liver and kidney function.
* Patients with confirmed uncontrolled autoimmune disorders.
* Patients subjected radiation therapy in the head or neck region in the last 5 years.
* Patients undergoing immunosuppressive and / or immunocompromised therapy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GBR Academy

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alessandro Cucchi

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Giuseppe Corinaldesi, MD,DDS,MS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

School of dentistry - University of Bologna

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

School of Dentistry - University of Bologna

Bologna, Italy, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CMF 01/2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.