Guided Bone Regeneration Using Fixed vs Non-Fixed Resorbable Collagen Membranes

NCT ID: NCT06334159

Last Updated: 2024-03-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-05

Study Completion Date

2027-07-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the horizontal bone gain when grafting a bone substitute with non fixed resorbable collagen membranes (control group), versus fixed resorbable collagen membranes (test group) in resorbed ridges requiring Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) to facilitate implant placement at 6 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the horizontal bone gain when grafting a mixture of xenograft and allograft (50/50) with non fixed resorbable collagen membranes (control group), versus fixed resorbable collagen membranes (test group) in resorbed ridges requiring Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) to facilitate implant placement at 6 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Resorption

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

non fixed resorbable collagen membranes (control group), versus fixed resorbable collagen membranes (test group)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group

Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration with a mixture of xenograft (Cerabone 0.5-1mm particles) and allograft (Maxgarft \<2mm particles) bone substitute (50/50) with non-fixed resorbable collagen membranes (Jason Membrane 20x30mm)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Horizontal GBR without the use of non-resorbable pins for the stabilization of the collagen membrane

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration, with a mixture of xenograft (Cerabone®) and allograft (Maxgraft®), on a 50-50 mixture ratio, grafted in the area required to be augmented, and then covered by a collagen membrane (Jason® membrane), being left unfixed (Control Group).

Test Group

Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration with a mixture of xenograft (Cerabone 0.5-1mm particles) and allograft (Maxgarft \<2mm particles) bone substitute (50/50) with fixed resorbable collagen membranes(Jason Membrane 20x30mm) with the use of pins (Titan Pins)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Horizontal GBR with the use of non-resorbable pins for the stabilization of the collagen membrane

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration, with a mixture of xenograft (Cerabone®) and allograft (Maxgraft®), on a 50-50 mixture ratio, grafted in the area required to be augmented, and then covered by a collagen membrane (Jason® membrane), being fixed with non-resorbable pins (Test Group).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Horizontal GBR with the use of non-resorbable pins for the stabilization of the collagen membrane

Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration, with a mixture of xenograft (Cerabone®) and allograft (Maxgraft®), on a 50-50 mixture ratio, grafted in the area required to be augmented, and then covered by a collagen membrane (Jason® membrane), being fixed with non-resorbable pins (Test Group).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Horizontal GBR without the use of non-resorbable pins for the stabilization of the collagen membrane

Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration, with a mixture of xenograft (Cerabone®) and allograft (Maxgraft®), on a 50-50 mixture ratio, grafted in the area required to be augmented, and then covered by a collagen membrane (Jason® membrane), being left unfixed (Control Group).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men and women over 18 years old or older
2. Patients requiring Guided Bone Regeneration due to insufficient ridge width(≤5mm) to place dental implants, with sufficient vertical ridge height (≥9mm) from vital anatomical structures (the inferior alveolar nerve in the Mandible, or the sinus in the Maxilla)
3. One or more teeth missing in posterior zone (Premolars, and Molars)
4. Absence of active Periodontal disease
5. Good level of oral hygiene (Plaque index \<25%)
6. Absence of systemic diseases that could influence the outcome of the therapy (Uncontrolled diabetes, osteoporosis, bisphosphonate medications)
7. Non smokers or light smokers (\<10 cigarettes per day)
8. Informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with sufficient ridge width (\>5 mm) and height (≥9mm) from vital anatomical structure) requiring no GBR to place dental implants
2. Patients with severe horizontal and vertical defects requiring other surgical techniques.
3. Long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy (3months).
4. Lactating females or currently pregnant women.
5. Severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders.
6. Unwillingness to return for follow-up examination.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cristina Vallés, DDS, MS, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Georgios Markantonatos

Barcelona, Sant Cugat Del Vallès, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Georgios Markantonatos, DDS

Role: CONTACT

+34666022568

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Georgios Markantonatos, DDS

Role: primary

+34666022568

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pagni G, Pellegrini G, Giannobile WV, Rasperini G. Postextraction alveolar ridge preservation: biological basis and treatments. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:151030. doi: 10.1155/2012/151030. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22737169 (View on PubMed)

Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A, d'Archivio D, di Placido G, Tumini V, Piattelli A. Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol. 2001 Nov;72(11):1560-71. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1560.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11759868 (View on PubMed)

Hua Wang, Chunfu Deng, Baohong Zhao, Dehao Shang, Chong Zhang, The Effect of Bone Formation with Bio-Oss Guided by Collagen Membrane, Journal of Hard Tissue Biology, 2013, 22 巻, 2 号, p. 255-260, 公開日 2013/04/26, Online ISSN 1880-828X, Print ISSN 1341-7649, https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.22.255, https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jhtb/22/2/22_255/_article/-char/ja, 抄録

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lee SW, Kim SG. Membranes for the Guided Bone Regeneration. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;36(6):239-46. doi: 10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.6.239. Epub 2014 Nov 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27489841 (View on PubMed)

Dimitriou R, Mataliotakis GI, Calori GM, Giannoudis PV. The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence. BMC Med. 2012 Jul 26;10:81. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-81.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22834465 (View on PubMed)

Urban IA, Lozada JL, Wessing B, Suarez-Lopez del Amo F, Wang HL. Vertical Bone Grafting and Periosteal Vertical Mattress Suture for the Fixation of Resorbable Membranes and Stabilization of Particulate Grafts in Horizontal Guided Bone Regeneration to Achieve More Predictable Results: A Technical Report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):153-9. doi: 10.11607/prd.2627.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26901293 (View on PubMed)

Amano Y, Ota M, Sekiguchi K, Shibukawa Y, Yamada S. Evaluation of a poly-l-lactic acid membrane and membrane fixing pin for guided tissue regeneration on bone defects in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Feb;97(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.09.009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14970774 (View on PubMed)

Francis J. Hughes. Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering in Dental Sciences, Academic Press,2015, ISBN 9780123971579: 434-444

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Loe H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol. 1967 Nov-Dec;38(6):Suppl:610-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1967.38.6.610. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 5237684 (View on PubMed)

Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J. 1975 Dec;25(4):229-35.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 1058834 (View on PubMed)

Cucchi A, Vignudelli E, Napolitano A, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Oct;19(5):821-832. doi: 10.1111/cid.12520. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28745035 (View on PubMed)

Sisti A, Canullo L, Mottola MP, Covani U, Barone A, Botticelli D. Clinical evaluation of a ridge augmentation procedure for the severely resorbed alveolar socket: multicenter randomized controlled trial, preliminary results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):526-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02386.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22150876 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PER-ECL-2019-08

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

GBR and Autogenous Bone Chips
NCT03946020 COMPLETED NA
Guided Bone Regeneration Using Synthetic Membrane
NCT01654627 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2
The Effect of IPD on Lateral Bone Augmentation
NCT06999915 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Vertical Ridge Augmentation Strategies
NCT06242782 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3