Evaluation of Bone Regenerated With Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) Using Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Membrane
NCT ID: NCT06186232
Last Updated: 2024-08-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
6 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-01
2025-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Guided Bone Regeneration in Atrophic Anterior Maxillary Ridges
NCT03731416
Vertical Ridge Augmentation With Autogenous Onlay Blocks Combined With Guided Bone Regeneration Versus Autogenous Bone Graft With Titanium Mesh in Posterior Mandible
NCT03680118
Assessment of Guided Bone Regeneration in Atrophic Anterior Maxilla
NCT03840681
GBR With Ptfe With Bovine Bone With and Without Autogenous
NCT03628157
Horizontal Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Sticky Bone Versus Collagen Membrane GBR
NCT03697616
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To achieve maximum bone regeneration, GBR membrane should have several characteristics, including:
* Biocompatibility.
* Proper stiffness for space maintenance.
* Prevent epithelial cell migration.
* Appropriate resorption time after proper bone regeneration. Membranes used in guided bone regeneration (GBR) may have some limitations as the need of second surgery for removal of the membrane (in case of non-resorbable membranes as titanium mesh or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membranes), lake of space maintenance (as collagen membranes) in addition to their high cost.
Thus, we aim to use a commercially available material as polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) with (GBR) to facilitate bone generation as well as subsequent implant placement.
Recent forms of (PMMA), have been certified to be biocompatible and safe for skin and mucosal contact. PMMA is characterized by having high toughness which may provide a space maintenance when using as membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR). The PMMA prosthesis can be pre-fabricated, which results in reduction of surgical time, easy technical handling and good esthetic results.
In addition, it has a relatively low cost when it is compared to other types of membranes used in guided bone regeneration (GBR).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patient with horizontally deficient ridge in ethetic maxilary zone need (GBR) and implant placement
a group of patients with with horizontally deficient ridge in esthetic maxillary zone will undergo ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) polymer as membrane.
guided bone regeneration (GBR).
guided bone regeneration (GBR) using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) polymer as membrane.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
guided bone regeneration (GBR).
guided bone regeneration (GBR) using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) polymer as membrane.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients are physically healthy with no medical history of any systemic or local disease that would contraindicate ridge augmentation and/or implant surgery or complicate the healing process. (Severe liver or kidney disease, a history of head and neck radiotherapy, chemotherapy at the time of surgery, uncontrolled diabetes, active periodontal in the residual dentition, inflammatory or autoimmune disorders of the oral mucosa, poor oral hygiene, patient failure to cooperate, and any other disease condition contraindicating the oral surgery).
* Non-smokers.
* Free from temporomandibular joint disorders and abnormal oral habits such as bruxism.
* The edentulous ridges were covered with optimal thickness of keratinized mucosa with no signs of inflammation, ulceration or scar tissue.
* The occlusion shows sufficient inter-arch space for future prothesis.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before fixation.
* Untreated periodontitis.
* Poor oral hygiene.
* Uncontrolled diabetes.
* Pregnant or nursing.
* Substance abuse.
* Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
* Severe bruxism or clenching.
* Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised.
* Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
* Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly followed
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rana Mohamed Sherif Abdel Mawgood
Evaluation Of Bone Regenerated After Guided Bone Regenration (GBR) using customized 3D printed Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane in horizontally deficient maxillary aesthetic zone.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hesham El Hawary
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Professor of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Cairo university
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Khojasteh A, Kheiri L, Motamedian SR, Khoshkam V. Guided Bone Regeneration for the Reconstruction of Alveolar Bone Defects. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul-Dec;7(2):263-277. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_76_17.
Benic GI, Hammerle CH. Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):13-40. doi: 10.1111/prd.12039.
Elgali I, Omar O, Dahlin C, Thomsen P. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017 Oct;125(5):315-337. doi: 10.1111/eos.12364. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
Lee SW, Kim SG. Membranes for the Guided Bone Regeneration. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;36(6):239-46. doi: 10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.6.239. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
Fernandes da Silva AL, Borba AM, Simao NR, Pedro FL, Borges AH, Miloro M. Customized polymethyl methacrylate implants for the reconstruction of craniofacial osseous defects. Case Rep Surg. 2014;2014:358569. doi: 10.1155/2014/358569. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
Freitas de Andrade P, Meza-Mauricio J, Kern R, Faveri M. Labial Repositioning Using Print Manufactured Polymethylmethacrylate- (PMMA-) Based Cement for Gummy Smile. Case Rep Dent. 2021 Dec 21;2021:7607522. doi: 10.1155/2021/7607522. eCollection 2021.
AlSubaie MF, Al-Sharydah AM, Nassim HM, Alhawsawi A. Orbital Floor Blowout Fracture Reconstruction Using Moldable Polymethyl Methacrylate: A Report of Two Cases and Their Imaging Findings. Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 May 25;14:223-232. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S359173. eCollection 2022.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OMFS 3310
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.