Diagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Non-clinical Screening Tests for Early Detection of Periodontitis
NCT ID: NCT03928080
Last Updated: 2022-01-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
408 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-09-01
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Gum disease cases in the population remain largely undetected because an affected individual does not feel the presence of gum disease and as a consequence people seek attention in the later stages of the disease once tooth loss has occurred.
In this study the investigators will compare different methods of screening for gum disease and compare them against a full professional examination. The investigators hope to be able to propose simple and effective methods for self-assessment that will allow people to suspect the presence of the disease before tooth loss occurs and thus allow early diagnosis and better treatment.
The whole study procedures consist 3 screening tests and the standard clinical examination. The screening tests involves:(1) a screening questionnaire; (2) a saliva test; (3) a toothbrushing test. Thereafter the participants will receive a standard clinical examination which is regarded as the gold standard for diagnosis of gum disease. Results of these tests will be compared with the standard clinical examination to assess the diagnostic accuracy of these tests.
The general aim of this program is to improve early detection of periodontitis in the population using a self-detection approach based on a toothbrush test as an early sign and a self-performed saliva test as a screening test for an individual to seek professional dental care early in the gum disease process.
The general hypothesis is that combining self-assessment of toothbrush test with a saliva test as an assessment of key inflammatory process underlying gum disease will increase the diagnostic accuracy of a screening approach in the population.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Test for the Discrimination of Periodontal Health and Disease
NCT05099731
Self-detection and Professional Screening Strategies for Early Detection of Periodontal Disease
NCT05513599
Activated MMP-8 as Diagnostic Test for Periodontitis
NCT02280122
Masticatory Function in the Differential Diagnosis of Stage IV Periodontitis
NCT05202132
Discovery and Validation of Periodontitis Biomarkers
NCT07293481
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Severe periodontitis is the 6th most prevalent disease of mankind. It is a non-communicable non-resolving inflammation and biofilm dysbiosis; if untreated it leads to tooth loss and masticatory dysfunction. It is: i) one of the top 80 human disease contributing 3.5 million years lived with disability, ii) a source of social inequality, iii) together with its major sequel - tooth loss - it is responsible for 88% of lost productivity from oral diseases (estimated at 54 billion USD), and iv) it is the major cause of escalating oral health costs ( 442 billion USD/year) that in advanced economies represent up to 10% of total medical expenses. Addressing this major public health problem requires greater attention to prevention and early detection.
Periodontitis cases in the population remain largely undetected due to lack of knowledge of early warning signs that can be self detected and to the fact that affected individuals adapt to life with increased degrees of disability as the disease progresses from an early stage (stage I) towards increasingly severe and invalidating stages (III-IV). Not unexpectedly, treatment outcomes improve with early detection while costs increase for later diagnosis due to the need for surgical intervention and rehabilitation of the teeth that have been lost. In partnership with the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United states, has validated a questionnaire (CDC/AAP questionnaire) for first step is important but its focus on more advanced disease, while appropriate to address individuals with more advanced disease, while appropriate to address individuals with more advanced disease towards specialist care, is unlikely to produce cost-effective health gains.
Spontaneous gingival bleeding or gingival bleeding upon tooth brushing (BoB) is a key sign of periodontitis with the potential to become a useful sentinel sign for self-detection. Surprisingly little is known about BoB and its relationship to professional assessment and diagnosis. Few studies have shown that it is highly sensitive to detect gingival inflammation but it has low to moderate specificity for periodontitis as it is shared by both gingivitis (superficial gum inflammation) and periodontitis. Its diagnostic performance, however, may be improved by combining it with salivary test able to discriminate between gingivitis and periodontitis. Salivary activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) is a biomarker associated with the inflammatory driven destruction of the periodontal ligament and alveolar characteristic of periodontitis; it has been shown to be able to discriminate between gingivitis and periodontitis in a point of care, professional setting.
The general aim of this program is to improve early detection of periodontitis in the population using a self-detection approach based on BoB as a sentinel sign and a consumer version of a point of care aMMP-8 test as a screening test for an individual to seek professional attention early in the periodontitis disease process.
Aims and Hypotheses to be Tested The aims of this diagnostic trial are to assess the diagnostic performance of: i) bleeding on brushing (BoB) as a sentinel sign, ii) salivary aMMP-8 as a biomarker, iii) a validated questionnaire alone and/or in combination for the early detection of periodontitis.
The general hypothesis is that combining self-assessment of a sentinel sign with a biomarker assessment of key inflammatory process underlying periodontitis will increase the diagnostic accuracy of a screening approach in the population.
Plan of Investigation (i) Subjects The study will involve two populations: i) a convenience sample of adult and elderly subjects reporting for oral health care at Prince Philip Dental Hospital and ii) a validation sample drawn from the Hong Kong adult and elderly population.
Study 1. Consecutive patients reporting to Prince Philip Dental Hospital reception clinic (screening and admission clinic) will be invited to participate.
Study 2. A validation sample will be drawn from a population of Hong Kong adult and elderly population in community and primary care settings. Subjects will be invited to participate and will be examined at the Clinical Research Center of the Prince Philip Dental Hospital.
The prevalence of different stages of periodontitis in the population is estimated at 8-12% for stage III-IV periodontitis and 28-32% for stage I-II periodontitis.
A sample size of 332 subjects has been estimated based on previous studies evaluating the area under the receiving operating curve (ROC curve) of the CDC/AAP questionnaire (0.68) and the ability to detect a 0.07 improvement with 80% power and p\<0.05. A total of 400 subjects will be recruited in each trial to compensate for missing data.
(ii) Methods Consenting subjects will be subject to 3 sequential index tests in a specified sequence: i) they will be administered a validated Cantonese version of CDC/AAP questionnaire; ii) subjects will be instructed to perform a 30 second mouthwash with a standard buffer in order to collect a full mouth sample for aMMP-8 analysis. This will be quantitatively assessed with a point of care test. iii) Subjects will then be instructed to brush their teeth for 2 minutes and the obtained slurry (saliva) quantitatively analyzed for the presence of blood with a spectrophotometric test.
Positive CDC/AAP test will be defined based on the pattern of response to 5 questions according to the criteria specified by a previous study.
Positive BoB test will be defined by the subject's identification of traces of blood in the brushing slurry and later validated quantitatively with a spectrophotometric method based on hemoglobin concentrations.
Positive aMMP-8 test for periodontitis will be defined as a concentration of aMMP-8 \> 20 ng/ml as determined with quantitative point of care lateral flow immunoassay.
After completion of the 3 experimental tests, subjects will undergo a full-mouth periodontal examination conducted by a trained and calibrated periodontal specialist who will determine the clinical diagnosis based on the 2017 international classification and case definition of periodontitis and gingivitis.
(iii) Study design Cross sectional diagnostic trial with independent blind comparison of experimental tests with a reference standard (professional diagnosis of periodontitis by a registered specialist in a clinical setting). First trial on a convenience sample of subjects reporting to Prince Philip Dental Hospital for oral health care, validation trial in a representative sample of the Hong Kong population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental cohort
Primary study to assess diagnostic accuracy
Bleeding on brushing
Index tests are bleeding on brushing and aMMP-8 Gold standard: clinical diagnosis performed by specialist
Confirmation cohort
Second cohort to confirm results from the first study on independent population
Bleeding on brushing
Index tests are bleeding on brushing and aMMP-8 Gold standard: clinical diagnosis performed by specialist
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bleeding on brushing
Index tests are bleeding on brushing and aMMP-8 Gold standard: clinical diagnosis performed by specialist
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having the ability to learn the standard toothbrushing method with artificial intelligence powered toothbrush.
* Ability and willingness to give written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant females.
* Having received professional periodontal treatment (other than supragingival cleaning) within the previous 12 months.
* Having received antibiotic medication within the previous 3 months.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Hong Kong
OTHER
The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio)
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maurizio Tonetti
Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maurizio Tonetti, DMD,PhD,MMSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prince Philip Dental Hospital, the Univerisity of Hong Kong
Hong Kong, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Blicher B, Joshipura K, Eke P. Validation of self-reported periodontal disease: a systematic review. J Dent Res. 2005 Oct;84(10):881-90. doi: 10.1177/154405910508401003.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig L, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC, Kressel HY, Rifai N, Golub RM, Altman DG, Hooft L, Korevaar DA, Cohen JF; STARD Group. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5527.
Carra MC, Gueguen A, Thomas F, Pannier B, Caligiuri G, Steg PG, Zins M, Bouchard P. Self-report assessment of severe periodontitis: Periodontal screening score development. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jul;45(7):818-831. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12899. Epub 2018 May 16.
Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Slade GD, Thornton-Evans GO, Beck JD, Taylor GW, Borgnakke WS, Page RC, Genco RJ. Self-reported measures for surveillance of periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2013 Nov;92(11):1041-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034513505621. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
Izadi Borujeni S, Mayer M, Eickholz P. Activated matrix metalloproteinase-8 in saliva as diagnostic test for periodontal disease? A case-control study. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2015 Dec;204(6):665-72. doi: 10.1007/s00430-015-0413-2. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
Kallio P, Ainamo J, Dusadeepan A. Self-assessment of gingival bleeding. Int Dent J. 1990 Aug;40(4):231-6.
Kallio P. Self-assessed bleeding in monitoring gingival health among adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996 Apr;24(2):128-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00829.x.
Leppilahti JM, Ahonen MM, Hernandez M, Munjal S, Netuschil L, Uitto VJ, Sorsa T, Mantyla P. Oral rinse MMP-8 point-of-care immuno test identifies patients with strong periodontal inflammatory burden. Oral Dis. 2011 Jan;17(1):115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01716.x.
Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: Framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S159-S172. doi: 10.1002/JPER.18-0006.
Trombelli L, Farina R, Silva CO, Tatakis DN. Plaque-induced gingivitis: Case definition and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S46-S73. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0576.
Bi M, Xie Y, Yu X, Li H, Pelekos G, Jin L, Li Y, Tonetti MS. Clinical Features Associated With Periodontal Case Misclassification by an Active Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Point-of-Care Oral Rinse Test. J Clin Periodontol. 2025 Sep;52(9):1276-1287. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.14189. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
Deng K, Zonta F, Yang H, Pelekos G, Tonetti MS. Development of a machine learning multiclass screening tool for periodontal health status based on non-clinical parameters and salivary biomarkers. J Clin Periodontol. 2024 Dec;51(12):1547-1560. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13856. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
Uy SNMR, Deng K, Fok CTC, Fok MR, Pelekos G, Tonetti MS. Food intake, masticatory function, tooth mobility, loss of posterior support, and diminished quality of life are associated with more advanced periodontitis stage diagnosis. J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Mar;49(3):240-250. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13588. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
Deng K, Pelekos G, Jin L, Tonetti MS. Gingival bleeding on brushing as a sentinel sign of gingival inflammation: A diagnostic accuracy trial for the discrimination of periodontal health and disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Dec;48(12):1537-1548. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13545. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HKUCTR-2631
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PhD20190130
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.