Ankle Foot Orthosis Comparative Effect

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

54 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-27

Study Completion Date

2023-12-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The proposed effort is designed to support evidence-based practice and optimal care by evaluating how the form, fit and function of two commercially available carbon fiber custom fit braces (Orthoses) influences outcomes following extremity injury. Early data suggests that custom fit carbon fiber braces can significantly improve function following severe lower leg injuries. The proposed study will provide evidence that can be used by clinicians to guide their practice, including care for service members, veterans and civilians who have experienced a high-energy traumatic injury to their lower leg.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

From Opinion to Evidence: Multi-site Evaluation of Custom Dynamic Orthosis Best Practices

NCT06352788

Foot Injury

RECRUITING NA

Custom Dynamic Orthoses to Reduce Articular Contact Stress

NCT05209347

Ankle Fractures Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis Ankle

WITHDRAWN NA

Iterative Design of Custom Dynamic Orthoses

NCT04800510

Adult ALL Healthy

COMPLETED NA

Identifying the Optimal Dynamic Ankle-Foot Orthosis Bending Stiffness for Individuals Post-Stroke

NCT06304519

Stroke

RECRUITING NA

Effect of Custom Dynamic Orthoses on Forefoot Loading

NCT06710119

Lower Extremity Injuries

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this research study, adult participants who have sustained a below-the-knee traumatic injury greater than two years ago and are still experiencing deficits including weakness and/or immobility will be assigned to one of two brace sequences (AB or BA). Participants will be randomized to a particular sequence, with an equal chance of getting either order. Participants will be evaluated under 4 conditions: no device, standard of care, and 2 carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDO), the Reaktiv device from FabTech Systems and the PhatBrace by Bio-Mechanical Composites Inc. Participants will be tested with no device and standard of care at baseline, after 3 months of accommodation to the Reaktiv, and 3 months of accommodation to the PhatBrace. A series of study measures will be performed. The physical performance measures will incorporate tests of agility, balance, speed and lower limb power. Questionnaires will be used to evaluate participant's perceived comfort and smoothness, pain, preference, and semi-structured interviews will be used to fully capture the perspective of the participant. A motion capture system will be used to evaluate walking mechanics, allowing comparisons between conditions. Lower limb forces and body motion will be assessed using computerized motion capture and force plates in the floor, as individuals walk over-ground. Small reflective markers placed on the participant's skin and force measuring plates in the floor will be used. The investigators will also complete mechanical testing of the devices and collect demographic and descriptive data.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Foot Injuries and Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Participants will be cast, fit, and tested with each device in question (Reaktiv and PhatBrace AFO). Participants will be randomized to one of two arms (AB or BA) to maximize the likelihood of similarity between groups with respect to a range of anthropometric, demographic and injury related factors. We will use block randomization in groups of 4 to achieve equal randomization between groups over time.

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AB

Participants in this arm will receive the Reaktiv AFO made by FabTech Systems LLC first, then the PhatBrace AFO by Bio-Mechanical Composites Inc. second.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reaktiv AFO

Intervention Type DEVICE

This device is a carbon fiber ankle foot orthosis (brace) that contacts the foot and lower leg. It consists of a foot plate that is designed to protect the foot, a carbon fiber strut on the back that stores and returns energy, and a cuff that goes below the knee. It has a custom geometry and alignment that is specific to the individual.

PhatBrace AFO

Intervention Type DEVICE

Although lighter and thinner than the Reaktiv it has a similar overall design. The posterior strut is typically longer and the footplate is thinner, more compliant and less customized. Further, the device is formed into a single piece.

BA

Participants in this arm will receive the PhatBrace AFO by Bio-Mechanical Composites Inc. first, then the Reaktiv AFO made by FabTech Systems LLC second.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Reaktiv AFO

Intervention Type DEVICE

This device is a carbon fiber ankle foot orthosis (brace) that contacts the foot and lower leg. It consists of a foot plate that is designed to protect the foot, a carbon fiber strut on the back that stores and returns energy, and a cuff that goes below the knee. It has a custom geometry and alignment that is specific to the individual.

PhatBrace AFO

Intervention Type DEVICE

Although lighter and thinner than the Reaktiv it has a similar overall design. The posterior strut is typically longer and the footplate is thinner, more compliant and less customized. Further, the device is formed into a single piece.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Reaktiv AFO

This device is a carbon fiber ankle foot orthosis (brace) that contacts the foot and lower leg. It consists of a foot plate that is designed to protect the foot, a carbon fiber strut on the back that stores and returns energy, and a cuff that goes below the knee. It has a custom geometry and alignment that is specific to the individual.

Intervention Type DEVICE

PhatBrace AFO

Although lighter and thinner than the Reaktiv it has a similar overall design. The posterior strut is typically longer and the footplate is thinner, more compliant and less customized. Further, the device is formed into a single piece.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Ages: 18-65
* Sustained a function limiting, below the knee, traumatic lower leg injury that occurred greater than two years ago
* Weakness of ankle plantarflexors (\<4/5 on MMT), limited pain free ankle motion (DF\<10deg or PF\<20deg), mechanical pain with loading onto hindfoot/midfoot/forefoot (\>4/10 on verbal numeric pain rating scale), ankle or hindfoot fusion or candidate for ankle or hindfoot fusion, AND/OR a candidate for amputation secondary to ankle/foot impairment
* Ability to walk 50 feet without using a cane or crutch
* Ability to walk at a slow to moderate pace
* Able to read and write in English and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Pain \> 8/10 while walking
* Ankle weakness as a result of spinal cord injury or central nervous system pathology
* Require a knee stabilizing device (i.e. Knee-Ankle Foot Orthosis or Knee Orthosis) to perform daily activities
* Surgery on study limb anticipated in the next 6 months
* Medical or psychological conditions that would preclude functional testing (ex. severe traumatic brain injury, heart condition, clotting disorder, lung condition, stroke, vestibular disorder)
* Nerve, muscle, bone, or other condition limiting function of the contralateral extremity
* BMI greater than 45
* Visual or hearing impairment that limit walking ability or limit the ability to comply with instructions given during testing
* Pregnancy- Per participant self-report. Due the expected small number of pregnant individuals and resulting inability to account for its effect on resulting outcomes participants will be withdrawn from the study.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No