Custom Dynamic Orthoses to Reduce Articular Contact Stress

NCT ID: NCT05209347

Last Updated: 2023-12-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-12-31

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The proposed study evaluates the effect of carbon fiber brace design on forces across the ankle. Research suggests that ankle arthritis develops following ankle fracture due, in part, to elevated forces on the cartilage. It is expected that carbon fiber braces can reduce forces in the ankle joint thereby reducing the risk of developing arthritis following injury. In this study, carbon fiber braces will be tested to determine how they influence the forces acting on the ankle cartilage. The proposed study will provide evidence that can be used by clinicians and researchers to design carbon fiber braces to effectively reduce forces on ankle cartilage.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary purpose of this line of research is to investigate the effects of carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) use on forces and contact stress at the ankle, with the goal of reducing the development of post traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). Research suggests that PTO develops, in part, due to increased ankle contact stress following fracture. It is expected that reducing articular contact stress has the potential to delay or prevent PTOA development. CDOs have been shown to significantly improve function after extremity injury, and show promise for offloading the injured ankle joint after severe lower extremity injuries. Therefore, the proposed effort is designed to evaluate CDOs effects on forces and articular contact stress at the ankle.

Adult participants who have sustained a traumatic ankle fracture of the tibial pilon will be evaluated while wearing two CDOs, with a primary dependent measure of ankle joint contact stress. Following consent and enrollment weight bearing computerized tomography (CT) images will be collected and used to determine the geometry of the joint, and the articular contact stress using discrete element analysis.

Participants will be cast and fit for two CDOs. Participants will be blinded to the design variation of each device and will only know them as CDO-A or CDO-B. Testing will be completed under 3 conditions: No-CDO, CDO-A, CDO-B, with each bracing condition (A/B) representing a different CDO. Physical performance measures will incorporate tests of agility, speed, and lower limb power to ensure that the CDOs do not negatively affect physical function. Questionnaires will be used to evaluate participants' current and desired activity level, pain with and without using a CDO, satisfaction with the study CDOs, perception of comfort and smoothness between CDOs, and preference between CDOs. Semi-structured interviews will be completed to fully capture the participant's perspective with each study CDO. Lower limb forces and motion will be assessed using a computerized motion capture system and force plates embedded in the floor. Forces between the foot and CDO footplate will be measured using force sensing insoles, and muscle activity data will be collected using wireless surface electromyography sensors. Each CDO will be mechanically tested, and participant demographic and anthropometric data will be recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Fractures Post-traumatic Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis Ankle

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Carbon Fiber Gait Analysis Ankle Foot Orthosis Arthritis Biomechanics Ankle Adult

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

All participants will be cast and fit with two CDOs. Each CDO will be labeled as CDO-A or CDO-B. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two CDO testing sequences (AB, BA) to prevent testing order from influencing study results.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants will be blinded to the different CDO designs and will only be introduced to each device as CDO-A or CDO-B.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NoCDO

Participants will be evaluated without a CDO

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

CDO-A

The first study CDO will be designated CDO-A

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff below the knee.

CDO-B

The second study CDO will be designated CDO-B

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff below the knee.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff below the knee.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Between the ages of 18 and 65
* Sustained unilateral fracture of the tibial pilon
* The fracture has completely healed
* Ability to walk 50 feet without use of an assistive device (cane, crutch, etc.)
* Ability to walk at a slow to moderate pace
* Shoe size between women's 8 and 13.5 or men's 6.5 and 12
* Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent
* Individuals with elevated contact stress according to model generated using standing CT images (will be answered after completing visit one)

Exclusion Criteria

* Pain \> 6/10 while walking
* Increase in pain during testing of 3/10 or greater
* Neurologic, musculoskeletal (including bilateral fractures) or other condition limiting function of the contralateral extremity
* Medical or psychological condition that would preclude functional testing (ex. moderate or severe brain injury, stroke, heart disease)
* Wounds to the calf that would prevent CDO fitting
* Fractures secondary to neuropathy or severe osteopenia
* Classification as non-ambulatory
* Previous fractures near the tibial pilon on the involved limb
* Surgery on involved limb anticipated in the next 6 months
* Requirement of a knee stabilizing device (i.e. KAFO, KO…) to perform daily activities
* Visual or hearing impairments that limit walking ability or limit the ability to comply with instructions given during testing
* BMI greater than 40
* Pregnancy- Per participant self-report. Due to the expected small number of pregnant individuals and resulting inability to account for its effect on resulting outcomes, participants will be withdrawn from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Iowa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jason Wilken

Director of Collaborative Research and Development, Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202112331

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id