Do Rocker Bottom Shoes and Ankle-Foot Orthoses Reduce Pain and Improve Mobility for Ankle Osteoarthritis Patients

NCT ID: NCT03524729

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2023-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ankle osteoarthritis (OA) is a painful, progressive condition that can severely limit physical activity and reduce quality of life. Rocker bottom (RB) shoes and ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly used as non-surgical treatments for ankle OA. RB shoes have a curved sole in the toe to heel direction that may alleviate joint pain by reducing ankle range of motion (ROM). Similarly, AFOs may reduce joint motion by securing the foot and ankle within the ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) frame. This study aims to determine the ability of RB shoes and AFOs to improve mobility, by relieving pain and reducing joint ROM.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators' objective is to compare two non-surgical treatments (RB shoes and Toeoff brand AFOs) in OA subjects by measuring their mobility and pain during and after a multi-week trial period. The investigators will use a biplane fluoroscopy system to measure foot joint motion for each condition (RB shoe, AFO, control shoe). This will yield clinical and biomechanical measures of the effect of each orthotic on mobility, pain, and joint ROM in an ankle OA population. The investigators will also compare the clinical and biomechanics outcomes of OA subjects to those of control subjects. This information will provide evidence to support clinical decision making.

Aim 1: Compare the daily sep count, self-selected walking speed, clinical outcome measures (PROMIS surveys) of a control shoe, RB shoe, and AFO worn over a multi-week trial period.

Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of a control shoe, RB shoe, and AFO on the foot and ankle joints range of motion.

Aim 3: Compare the ankle OA clinical and biomechanical outcome measures for the control shoe, RB shoe, and AFO to a healthy control group wearing control shoes.

The efficacy of conservative treatments such as RB shoes and AFOs for managing OA pain and discomfort is not well supported by clinical evidence. By using biplane fluoroscopy along with validated clinical measures of pain and mobility, this study will elucidate the mechanism by which RB shoes and AFOs biomechanically alter foot and ankle function. Identifying beneficial treatment strategies for people with ankle OA will help them regain their mobility and improve their quality of life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ankle Osteoarthritis Healthy Ankles

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

The osteoarthritis participants will wear the control shoe, rocker bottom shoe, and AFO for multiple weeks each. The order of the treatments (control shoe, rocker bottom shoe, and AFO) will be randomize.

The control group will only wear the control shoe.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

No masking

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ankle osteoarthritis patients

Ambulatory adult patients (18+) with ankle osteoarthritis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rocker bottom shoe

Intervention Type DEVICE

Walking shoe with a anterior posterior rocker sole.

Ankle foot orthosis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Dynamic carbon fiber ankle brace.

Standard walking shoe

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard walking shoe (control shoe) with no rocker sole.

Healthy control subjects

Ambulatory adults (18+) with no known ankle osteoarthritis.

Group Type OTHER

Standard walking shoe

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard walking shoe (control shoe) with no rocker sole.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rocker bottom shoe

Walking shoe with a anterior posterior rocker sole.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ankle foot orthosis

Dynamic carbon fiber ankle brace.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard walking shoe

Standard walking shoe (control shoe) with no rocker sole.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For osteoarthritis patients:

* radiographic evidence of tibiotalar osteoarthritis
* ambulatory

For healthy controls:

* ambulatory
* aged 18 or older

Exclusion Criteria

For osteoarthritis patients and healthy controls:

* subtalar joint arthritis
* plans for surgical treatment of ankle osteoarthritis within the next 4 months
* surgical, neurological, metabolic, or lower limb musculoskeletal problem that would impair study measures
* inability to walk unassisted during short, repeated walking trials
* rheumatoid arthritis
* inadequate cognitive or language function to consent or to participate
* no phone number or stable mailing address
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bruce J. Sangeorzan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RX002278

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

F2278-R

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Validation of a Portable Ankle Arthrometer
NCT07163897 NOT_YET_RECRUITING