Do Rocker Bottom Shoes and Ankle-Foot Orthoses Reduce Pain and Improve Mobility for Ankle Osteoarthritis Patients
NCT ID: NCT03524729
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
11 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-01
2023-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacity of a Rigid Ankle Foot Orthosis for Persons With Ankle Osteoarthritis
NCT04312373
Orthotic Dose Response Study
NCT02629731
Improving the Detection, Classification and Treatment of Misaligned Arthritic Ankles
NCT03440008
Shoe Orthotics for Improvement of Biomechanics and Symptoms of Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT02234895
Treatment Outcomes for Ankle Arthritis
NCT00391365
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1: Compare the daily sep count, self-selected walking speed, clinical outcome measures (PROMIS surveys) of a control shoe, RB shoe, and AFO worn over a multi-week trial period.
Aim 2: Evaluate the effect of a control shoe, RB shoe, and AFO on the foot and ankle joints range of motion.
Aim 3: Compare the ankle OA clinical and biomechanical outcome measures for the control shoe, RB shoe, and AFO to a healthy control group wearing control shoes.
The efficacy of conservative treatments such as RB shoes and AFOs for managing OA pain and discomfort is not well supported by clinical evidence. By using biplane fluoroscopy along with validated clinical measures of pain and mobility, this study will elucidate the mechanism by which RB shoes and AFOs biomechanically alter foot and ankle function. Identifying beneficial treatment strategies for people with ankle OA will help them regain their mobility and improve their quality of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
The control group will only wear the control shoe.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ankle osteoarthritis patients
Ambulatory adult patients (18+) with ankle osteoarthritis.
Rocker bottom shoe
Walking shoe with a anterior posterior rocker sole.
Ankle foot orthosis
Dynamic carbon fiber ankle brace.
Standard walking shoe
Standard walking shoe (control shoe) with no rocker sole.
Healthy control subjects
Ambulatory adults (18+) with no known ankle osteoarthritis.
Standard walking shoe
Standard walking shoe (control shoe) with no rocker sole.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rocker bottom shoe
Walking shoe with a anterior posterior rocker sole.
Ankle foot orthosis
Dynamic carbon fiber ankle brace.
Standard walking shoe
Standard walking shoe (control shoe) with no rocker sole.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* radiographic evidence of tibiotalar osteoarthritis
* ambulatory
For healthy controls:
* ambulatory
* aged 18 or older
Exclusion Criteria
* subtalar joint arthritis
* plans for surgical treatment of ankle osteoarthritis within the next 4 months
* surgical, neurological, metabolic, or lower limb musculoskeletal problem that would impair study measures
* inability to walk unassisted during short, repeated walking trials
* rheumatoid arthritis
* inadequate cognitive or language function to consent or to participate
* no phone number or stable mailing address
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bruce J. Sangeorzan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RX002278
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
F2278-R
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.