Efficacity of a Rigid Ankle Foot Orthosis for Persons With Ankle Osteoarthritis
NCT ID: NCT04312373
Last Updated: 2020-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
3 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-02-01
2017-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a rigid ankle-foot orthosis (R-AFO) for walking pain in a population suffering from AOA.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of the Functional Walking Outcomes of Two Settings of a Commercially Available AFO in Adult Stroke Patients
NCT02122783
Do Rocker Bottom Shoes and Ankle-Foot Orthoses Reduce Pain and Improve Mobility for Ankle Osteoarthritis Patients
NCT03524729
Early Protected Full Weight-bearing vs. Partial Weight-bearing After Surgical Fixation of Unstable Ankle Fractures, Monitored With Bio-feedback Insoles.
NCT06023979
Comparison of Thermo-plastic Versus Carbon Foot Ankle Orthosis to Improve Gait and Reduce Fatigue in Post-stroke Patients: a Biomechanical and Neurophysiological Study
NCT04323943
Contribution of an Off-the-shelf Carbon Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) in the Management of Walking Functional Impairment
NCT05131399
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At the end of each test, an visual analogue scale for the pain and the walking distance travelled during the 2MWT were recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ankle Foot Orthosis
According to the SCED methodology, patients were fitted with ankle foot orthosis intermittently, during 4 phases, in the following order : without orthosis (A1), with orthosis (B1), again without orthosis (A2) and again with orthosis (B2).
All the phases were carried out over one day.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to walk at least two minutes
Exclusion Criteria
* respiratory diseases that prevent subjects from performing the walking tests
* neurologic or orthopaedic diseases which could affect their gait (excluding AOA)
* inability to understand study instructions
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Union de Gestion des Etablissements des Caisses d'Assurance Maladie - Nord Est
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jean Paysant, PhD-MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institut Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Régional de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation
Nancy, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRR-2018-SCED
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.