Comparison of the Functional Walking Outcomes of Two Settings of a Commercially Available AFO in Adult Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT02122783
Last Updated: 2021-10-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
5 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-01-31
2020-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Understanding the Effects of Quantitatively-Prescribing Passive-Dynamic Ankle-Foot Orthosis Bending Stiffness for Individuals Post-Stroke
NCT04619043
AFO Prescription to Optimize Post-Stroke Function
NCT06692686
Evaluation of the Effect of an Ankle Foot Orthoses for Ambulatory Function
NCT01336517
Identifying the Optimal Dynamic Ankle-Foot Orthosis Bending Stiffness for Individuals Post-Stroke
NCT06304519
Comparison of Thermo-plastic Versus Carbon Foot Ankle Orthosis to Improve Gait and Reduce Fatigue in Post-stroke Patients: a Biomechanical and Neurophysiological Study
NCT04323943
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional then Experimental brace resistance
Participants received the Default intervention for a period of a month, were evaluated in the lab and then the novel intervention was administered for use for the next month. There was a small period (few hours in the lab) where the subject was transitioned to the second intervention.
ADR™ brace resistance
Conventional brace resistance (using hard stops)
Conventional polypropylene custom molded ankle foot orthosis (MAFO) with Lawrence style double channel adjustable joints containing pins/springs
Experimental then Conventional brace resistance
Participants received the the novel elastomer to provide brace support intervention for a period of a month, were evaluated in the lab and then the conventional intervention was administered for use for the next month. There was a small period (few hours in the lab) where the subject was transitioned to the second intervention.
ADR™ brace resistance
Conventional brace resistance (using hard stops)
Conventional polypropylene custom molded ankle foot orthosis (MAFO) with Lawrence style double channel adjustable joints containing pins/springs
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ADR™ brace resistance
Conventional brace resistance (using hard stops)
Conventional polypropylene custom molded ankle foot orthosis (MAFO) with Lawrence style double channel adjustable joints containing pins/springs
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis of stroke more than 1 year ago
3. Ambulatory at 0.5m/s or greater
4. Require unilateral AFOs to ambulate
5. Stable medical condition - no concomitant progressive diseases that could affect motor function
6. Ability to comply with directions and cooperate with research team
Exclusion Criteria
2. Anticipated surgical or pharmacologic intervention for tone/contractures during the study period
3. Additional neurologic or musculoskeletal diagnoses that might impair gait (i.e., recent orthopedic interventions (6 weeks), unhealed fractures, significant degenerative joint disease, lower limb amputation, uncontrolled seizures)
4. Recent cardiac or active pulmonary disease, liable blood pressure
5. Recent back surgery
21 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mukul Talaty
Biomechanist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mukul Talaty, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Albert Einstein (MossRehab)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MossRehab
Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HN 4422
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.