Iterative Design of Custom Dynamic Orthoses to Reduce Articular Contact Stress
NCT ID: NCT04562896
Last Updated: 2026-01-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-08
2023-10-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Custom Dynamic Orthoses to Reduce Articular Contact Stress
NCT05209347
Iterative Design of Custom Dynamic Orthoses
NCT04800510
Comparative Effect of Carbon Fiber Orthosis Cuff Design on Preference, Comfort, and Mechanics
NCT05456295
From Opinion to Evidence: Multi-site Evaluation of Custom Dynamic Orthosis Best Practices
NCT06352788
The Effects of Heel Distraction Height on Foot Loading With Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthoses
NCT06127316
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Adult participants will be evaluated while wearing carbon fiber braces of varied geometry. The primary dependent measure is ankle joint contact stress. Following consent and enrollment computerized tomography (CT) images will be used to determine the geometry of the joint articular surfaces. Ankle contact stress will be calculated using discrete element analysis and biomechanical data collected in subsequent data collection.
Participants will be cast and fit for three CDOs with varied geometry. Participants will be blinded to the design variation of each device and will only know them as CDO-A, CDO-B, or CDO-C. Testing will be completed under 4 conditions: No-CDO, CDO-A, CDO-B, CDO-C, with each bracing condition (A/B/C) representing a CDO design variant. Physical performance measures will incorporate tests of agility, speed, and lower limb power to ensure that changes to device design do not negatively affect physical function. Questionnaires will be used to evaluate participants' current and desired activity level, pain with and without CDO use, satisfaction with the devices, perception of comfort and smoothness between devices, and preference between CDOs. Semi-structured interviews will be completed to fully capture the participant's perspective. Lower limb forces and motion will be assessed using a computerized motion capture system and force plates in the floor. Forces between the foot and CDO will be measured using force sensing insoles, and muscle activity data will be collected using surface electromyography. Devices will be mechanically tested, and participant demographic and anthropometric data will be recorded.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No Device
Participants will be evaluated without a CDO.
No interventions assigned to this group
CDO-A
The first design variant will be designated CDO-A
Custom Carbon Fiber Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)
The custom carbon fiber dynamic orthoses will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff below the knee.
CDO-B
The second design variant will be designated CDO-B
Custom Carbon Fiber Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)
The custom carbon fiber dynamic orthoses will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff below the knee.
CDO-C
The third design variant will be designated CDO-C
Custom Carbon Fiber Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)
The custom carbon fiber dynamic orthoses will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff below the knee.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Custom Carbon Fiber Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)
The custom carbon fiber dynamic orthoses will consist of a semi-rigid foot plate, a posterior carbon fiber strut, and a proximal cuff below the knee.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Sustained unilateral fracture of the tibial pilon within the preceding 5 years
* The fracture has completely healed
* Ability to walk 50 feet without use of an assistive device (cane, crutch, etc.)
* Ability to walk at a slow to moderate pace
* Shoe size between women's 8 and 13.5 or men's 6.5 and 13
* Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent
* Individuals with elevated contact stress according to model generated using PedCAT standing CT images (will be answered after completing visit one)
* Between the ages of 18 and 65
* Shoe size between women's 8 and 13.5 or men's 6.5 and 13
* Healthy individuals without a current complaint of lower extremity pain, spine pain, or medical or neuromusculoskeletal disorders that have limited participation in work or exercise in the last 6 months
* Full active range of motion of the bilateral lower extremities and spine
* Ability to hop without pain
* Ability to perform a full squat without pain
* Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Increase in pain during testing of 3/10 or greater
* Neurologic, musculoskeletal (including bilateral fractures) or other condition limiting function of the contralateral extremity
* Medical or psychological condition that would preclude functional testing (ex. moderate or severe brain injury, stroke, heart disease)
* Wounds to the calf that would prevent CDO fitting
* Fractures secondary to neuropathy or severe osteopenia
* Classification as non-ambulatory
* Previous fractures near the tibial pilon on the involved limb
* Surgery on involved limb anticipated in the next 6 months
* Requirement of a knee stabilizing device (i.e. KAFO, KO…) to perform daily activities
* Visual or hearing impairments that limit walking ability or limit the ability to comply with instructions given during testing
* BMI greater than 40
* Pregnancy- Per participant self-report. Due to the expected small number of pregnant individuals and resulting inability to account for its effect on resulting outcomes, participants will be withdrawn from the study.
HEALTHY ABLE-BODIED PARTICIPANTS:
* Diagnosed moderate or severe brain injury
* Prior lower extremity injury resulting in surgery or limiting function for greater than 6 weeks
* Diagnosis of a physical or psychological condition that would preclude testing (e.g. cardiac condition, clotting disorder, pulmonary condition)
* Visual or hearing impairment that would interfere with instructions given during testing
* Require an assistive device
* Wounds to the foot or calf that would prevent CDO use
* BMI greater than 40
* Pregnancy - Per participant self-report. Due to the expected small number of pregnant individuals and resulting inability to account for its effect on resulting outcomes, participants will be withdrawn from the study
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Delaware
OTHER
Bio-Mechanical Composites
UNKNOWN
Fabtech Systems
UNKNOWN
University of Iowa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jason Wilken
Director of Collaborative Research and Development, Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Iowa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDMRP-PR172087
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
202002769
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.