Reliability of Force Measurement Within the Carbon Fiber Orthosis Proximal Cuff

NCT ID: NCT06127264

Last Updated: 2025-12-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of this research study is to determine if forces within carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs) can be reliability assessed using Loadpad and Loadsol force measuring sensors (Novel GMBH, St. Paul, MN). An improved understanding of the forces acting within orthoses may help to guide future orthosis related research studies, provision methods, and patient education.

Study participants will consist of three groups; 1) healthy, able-bodied adult participants using generic sized CDOs, which consist of a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee, a posterior carbon fiber strut that runs the length of the leg and bends to store and return energy, and a semi-rigid footplate that acts as a lever arm to bend the posterior strut, 2) individuals without peripheral neuropathy who use AFO(s) regularly, and 3) individuals with peripheral neuropathy who use AFO(s) regularly. .

Group 1 participants will be asked to fasten the proximal cuff to a self-selected cuff tightness 'SSCT', as well as three different predefined force levels; 'Loose' where the proximal cuff is loosely fastened around the participants leg, 'Moderate' where the proximal cuff is fastened with moderate tightness, and 'Tight' where the proximal cuff is tightly fastened around the participants leg. Testing in the predetermined force levels (Loose, Moderate, Tight) will occur in a randomized order. Group 2 and Group 3 participants will be asked to fasten their AFO(s) to a self-selected 'SSCT' tightness.

For all groups, forces acting on the leg, within the proximal cuff, will be measured using wireless Loadpad sensors and forces acting on the foot will be measured using wireless Loadsol insoles. Testing will include collection of force data as participants sit quietly, stand quietly, and walk and completion of questionnaires.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) are medical devices often used to support the foot and ankle during daily activities. Carbon fiber custom dynamic orthoses (CDOs), one subset of AFOs, that consist of a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg just below the knee, a posterior carbon fiber strut that runs the length of the leg and bends to store and return energy during gait, a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate that acts as a lever arm to bend the posterior strut, and in some cases a foam heel wedge placed between the footplate and the shoe. Different CDO design characteristics, such as posterior strut stiffness, device alignment, and heel cushion height and stiffness have been studied in the past. While different design characteristics have been studied previously, there is little information available concerning the proximal cuff and how it impacts patient outcomes. Different types of AFOs and CDOs have been used in an effort to offload the limb for years. Both CDOs and patellar tendon bearing (PTB) style AFOs have been shown to reduce forces acting on the plantar surface of the foot. While multiple studies have indicated the importance of fastening the proximal cuff, few have actually investigated the forces acting within the proximal cuff. A loose proximal cuff has been associated with pistoning of the limb, where the limb translates down within the proximal cuff during loading, potentially increasing forces acting on the foot and reducing the offloading effects of the orthosis. Only one study investigated the effects of altering forces within the proximal cuff by adding more padding to the proximal cuff, which was shown to improve limb offloading.

A better understanding of the forces acting within the proximal cuff, and how these effect patient outcomes would help to guide future AFO related research studies, provision, and patient education. At this point in time there is little guidance available to inform patients how tightly they need to secure the proximal cuff when wearing an AFO, many clinicians recommend tightening it so that it's secure, but not uncomfortable. The ability to measure forces within the proximal cuff and an idea of the range of forces seen in a clinical setting will act as a first step to better understanding how forces acting within the proximal cuff impact patient outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO) Peripheral Neuropathy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Ankle Foot Orthosis Carbon Fiber Orthosis Plantar Force

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Participants in Group 1 will be asked to fasten the proximal cuff to a self-selected cuff tightness 'SSCT', as well as three different predefined force levels; Loose, Moderate, and Tight. Participants in Group 2 and Group 3 will only be asked to fasten their AFO(s) to a self-selected tightness. Testing will occur without a CDO (NoCDO) and with each cuff tightness (SSCT, Loose, Moderate, Tight). Forces acting on the leg will be measured using wireless Loadpad sensors and forces acting on the plantar surface of the foot will be measured using wireless Loadsol insoles. Testing will include collection of force data as participants sit quietly, stand quietly, and walk and completion of questionnaires. Testing in the predetermined force levels (Loose, Moderate, Tight) will occur in a randomized order.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants will be blinded, to the greatest extent possible, to the different CDO proximal cuff tightness's.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NoCDO

Participants will complete study activities without wearing a CDO

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

SSCT

Participants will complete study activities while wearing a CDO fastened to their self-selected proximal cuff tightness

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) will consist of a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate, a carbon fiber posterior strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg below the knee that is fastened to different tightness's

Loose

Participants will complete study activities while wearing a CDO fastened to a loose proximal cuff tightness

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) will consist of a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate, a carbon fiber posterior strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg below the knee that is fastened to different tightness's

Moderate

Participants will complete study activities while wearing a CDO fastened to a moderate proximal cuff tightness

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) will consist of a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate, a carbon fiber posterior strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg below the knee that is fastened to different tightness's

Tight

Participants will complete study activities while wearing a CDO fastened to a tight proximal cuff tightness

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

Intervention Type DEVICE

The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) will consist of a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate, a carbon fiber posterior strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg below the knee that is fastened to different tightness's

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Carbon Fiber Custom Dynamic Orthosis (CDO)

The carbon fiber custom dynamic orthosis (CDO) will consist of a semi-rigid carbon fiber footplate, a carbon fiber posterior strut, and a proximal cuff that wraps around the leg below the knee that is fastened to different tightness's

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Between the ages of 18 and 65
* Healthy without current complaint of lower extremity pain, spine pain, open wounds or active infections, or medical or neuromusculoskeletal disorders that have limited their participation in work or exercise in the last 6 months
* Able to hop without pain
* Able to perform a full squat without pain
* Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent
* Ability to fit in a generic sized CDO


* Between the ages of 18 and 90
* Use an AFO(s) for daily activities
* The AFO(s) proximal cuff is compatible with loadpad sensors
* Have used their AFO(s) for a minimum of 2 weeks
* Ability to walk 50 feet without use of an assistive device (e.g. cane, crutch, etc.)
* Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent


* Between the ages of 18 and 90
* Use an AFO(s) for daily activities
* The AFO(s) proximal cuff is compatible with loadpad sensors
* Have used their AFO(s) for a minimum of 2 weeks
* Ability to walk 50 feet without use of an assistive device (e.g. cane, crutch, etc.)
* Diagnosis or indication of peripheral neuropathy determined using Semmes Weinstein Filaments
* Ability to read and write in English and provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed with a moderate or severe brain injury
* Lower extremity injury resulting in surgery or limiting function for greater than 6 weeks
* Injuries that would limit performance in this study
* Diagnosed with a physical or psychological condition that would preclude functional testing (e.g. cardiac condition, clotting disorder, pulmonary condition)
* Visual or hearing impairments that limit walking ability or limit the ability to comply with instructions given during testing
* Require use of an assistive device
* Unhealed wounds (cuts/abrasions) that would prevent AFO use
* BMI \> 40
* Pregnancy

Group 2 - AFO Users without Peripheral Neuropathy


* Diagnosis or indication of peripheral neuropathy determined using Semmes Weinstein Filaments
* Medical or psychological condition that would preclude functional testing (ex. Moderate or severe brain injury, stroke, heart disease)
* Requirement of a knee stabilizing device (e.g. KAFO, KO) to preform daily activities
* Visual or hearing impairments that limit walking ability or limit the ability to comply with instructions given during testing
* BMI \> 40
* Pregnancy

Group 3 - AFO Users with Peripheral Neuropathy


* Medical or psychological condition that would preclude functional testing (ex. Moderate or severe brain injury, stroke, heart disease)
* Requirement of a knee stabilizing device (e.g. KAFO, KO) to preform daily activities
* Visual or hearing impairments that limit walking ability or limit the ability to comply with instructions given during testing
* BMI \> 40
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Iowa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jason Wilken

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jason Wilken, PT,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Iowa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 3193356857

Email: [email protected]

Kirsten M Anderson, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 3193530431

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jason M Wilken, PT, PhD

Role: primary

Kirsten M Anderson, PhD

Role: backup

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202212359

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id