Adherence and Perspiration While Wearing Lower Limb Prostheses
NCT ID: NCT03900845
Last Updated: 2026-01-27
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-17
2022-06-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this research is to compare three different, lower limb prosthetic suspension systems and identify which is most effective at maintaining a secure adherence when worn in conditions that result in profuse sweating. The investigators also aim to compare how the three study prostheses effect residual limb skin health and comfort when participants pursue their usual activities in the home, work, and community environments.
To achieve these aims, the investigators will to recruit 25 below-knee amputees. Each subject will be asked to be asked to wear: (1) their as-prescribed prosthesis, (2) a prosthesis with a perforated elastomeric liner that allows sweat to flow away from the skin, and (3) a prosthesis that has a battery and body-weight activated pump to flow air between the prosthesis and the residual limb skin, allowing expulsion of any accumulated sweat. Subjects will wear each of these prostheses in the home, work, and community environments for two weeks, after which the investigators will measure their residual limb health and comfort. Subjects will then walk on a treadmill in a room whose climate will be set to Middle East-like conditions: 35 °C (95 °F) and 50% relative humidity. After 30 minutes, the investigators will measure any slippage of their prosthesis relative to their limb and how much sweat is expelled. The investigators hypothesize there will be differences in the amount of slippage, residual limb health, and comfort between the three prostheses.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimizing Prosthetic Prescription to Mitigate the Effects of Perspiration
NCT07024342
Study to Determine if Different Prosthetic Sockets Effect How Much Oxygen is in the Tissue of Lower Limb Amputees While They Are Walking
NCT00985842
A Comparison of External Mechanical Work Between Different Prosthetic Feet
NCT01340807
Influence of Socket Volume on Prosthesis Performance
NCT02124915
Stability and 3D Motion Study of an Experimental Prosthetic Foot
NCT00968292
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators will compare the performance of an individual's as-prescribed suspension with two exciting alternatives: a new-to-market liner intended to transport perspiration away from the skin and an improved version of the Dynamic Air Exchange (DAE) suspension system the investigators developed. The new-to-market suspension system consists of a perforated elastomeric liner that allows perspiration to be exuded into the liner-prosthesis space. Anecdotal reports suggest this liner (Uniprox's SoftSkin Air), can maintain suspension during profuse perspiration, but may result in excessive skin dryness and discomfort. The improved Dynamic Air Exchange - Rising Edge Design (DAE-RED) suspension expels accumulated perspiration using a vacuum pump like its predecessor, but incorporates hybrid, body-weight activated pump to minimize battery consumption and a revised ventilation system obviating the need for undesirable exterior tube connections.
The objective of the proposed research is to provide lower limb amputees who work in demanding environments with a prosthesis that remains secure despite profuse residual limb perspiration without compromising residual limb health and comfort.
The proposed research has two specific aims: (1) compare three different, lower limb prosthetic suspension systems and identify which is most effective at maintaining a secure adherence when worn in conditions that result in profuse perspiration, and (2) compare how the three suspension systems effect residual limb skin health and comfort when participants pursue their usual activities in the home, work, and community environments.
The investigators will recruit unilateral transtibial amputees who are successful ambulators on their as-prescribed prosthesis and collect baseline data (residual limb skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (skin barrier function), and Socket Comfort Score). After fitting the participants with Uniprox and DAE-RED prostheses, subjects will wear one of these study prostheses (random order) for two weeks, after which the investigators will measure their skin hydration, transepidermal water loss, and Socket Comfort Score. The subject will then enter our environmental chamber (35° C and 50% relative humidity) and sit for a 30-minute acclimation period. The subject will then walk for 30 minutes on a treadmill at their self-selected speed. Subjects will then exit the environmental chamber and sit for 30 minutes in a comfortable climate (\~20° C and 50% relative humidity). The amount of slippage, along with the perspiration accumulated/expelled, will be then be measured. Subjects will then be fit with their as-prescribed prosthesis and the protocol repeated to washout intervention effects. Finally, subjects will be fit with the other study prosthesis (either Uniprox or DAE-RED) and repeat the protocol.
After wearing the prostheses in our environmental chamber set to Middle East-like conditions (35 °C and 50% relative humidity), the investigators hypothesize:
H1.1 The amount of slippage (loss of adherence) will be different between the three suspension systems.
H1.2 The amount of perspiration expelled will be different between the Uniprox and DAE-RED.
After wearing the study prostheses in the home, work, and community environments for two weeks, the investigators hypothesize:
H2.1 Residual limb skin hydration will be different between the three suspension systems.
H2.2 Residual limb transepidermal water loss will be different between the three suspension systems.
H2.3 The Socket Comfort Score will be different between the three suspension systems.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Environmental Chamber
All participants will wear all three study prostheses in an environmental chamber set at 35 degrees Celsius and 50% relative humidity.
Dynamic Air Exchange - Rising Edge Design (DAE-RED)
The DAE-RED suspension system expels perspiration to the prosthesis exterior using a hybrid battery-powered pump and a body-weight activated pump. To use the DAE-RED, subjects will be fit with a modified patellar tendon-bearing socket that fits over a custom liner and sock. Up to four air intake ports are located proximally on the liner, approximately 25 mm superior to the socket brim. These ports incorporate a microvalve that allows air to flow into the liner-skin interstitial space while still maintaining a vacuum suspension. Distally, the pin lock has a 3-mm hole along its longitudinal axis that allows perspiration to be expelled into a distal reservoir. The prosthesis will also include: a standard aluminum pylon, pyramid adapters, and an Ossur Proflex XC prosthetic foot with Unity pump and foot cover.
Perforated elastomeric liner
The unique element of this perforated elastomeric liner are small perforations (\~0.3 mm diameter), uniformly distributed on a 4 x 5 mm grid, but with no perforations on the distal umbrella, that allow perspiration to be exuded into the liner-socket interstitial space. To use the perforated elastomeric liner, subjects will be fit with a modified patellar tendon-bearing socket that fits over a sock and the perforated elastomeric liner with a pin lock. The sock, worn between the socket and the liner, is used to absorb perspiration that is transported through the perforations in the liner. When needed for residual limb volume control, additional socks will be donned and included in tare weighing. The prosthesis will also include: a standard aluminum pylon, pyramid adapters, and an Ossur Proflex XC prosthetic foot and cosmesis.
As-prescribed prosthesis
The individual's as-prescribed suspension system is the prosthesis prescription that the patient and their clinical care team believes is the best prosthesis for their needs.
Field Measurements
All participants will wear all three study prostheses in their home, work, and community environments for two weeks.
Dynamic Air Exchange - Rising Edge Design (DAE-RED)
The DAE-RED suspension system expels perspiration to the prosthesis exterior using a hybrid battery-powered pump and a body-weight activated pump. To use the DAE-RED, subjects will be fit with a modified patellar tendon-bearing socket that fits over a custom liner and sock. Up to four air intake ports are located proximally on the liner, approximately 25 mm superior to the socket brim. These ports incorporate a microvalve that allows air to flow into the liner-skin interstitial space while still maintaining a vacuum suspension. Distally, the pin lock has a 3-mm hole along its longitudinal axis that allows perspiration to be expelled into a distal reservoir. The prosthesis will also include: a standard aluminum pylon, pyramid adapters, and an Ossur Proflex XC prosthetic foot with Unity pump and foot cover.
Perforated elastomeric liner
The unique element of this perforated elastomeric liner are small perforations (\~0.3 mm diameter), uniformly distributed on a 4 x 5 mm grid, but with no perforations on the distal umbrella, that allow perspiration to be exuded into the liner-socket interstitial space. To use the perforated elastomeric liner, subjects will be fit with a modified patellar tendon-bearing socket that fits over a sock and the perforated elastomeric liner with a pin lock. The sock, worn between the socket and the liner, is used to absorb perspiration that is transported through the perforations in the liner. When needed for residual limb volume control, additional socks will be donned and included in tare weighing. The prosthesis will also include: a standard aluminum pylon, pyramid adapters, and an Ossur Proflex XC prosthetic foot and cosmesis.
As-prescribed prosthesis
The individual's as-prescribed suspension system is the prosthesis prescription that the patient and their clinical care team believes is the best prosthesis for their needs.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dynamic Air Exchange - Rising Edge Design (DAE-RED)
The DAE-RED suspension system expels perspiration to the prosthesis exterior using a hybrid battery-powered pump and a body-weight activated pump. To use the DAE-RED, subjects will be fit with a modified patellar tendon-bearing socket that fits over a custom liner and sock. Up to four air intake ports are located proximally on the liner, approximately 25 mm superior to the socket brim. These ports incorporate a microvalve that allows air to flow into the liner-skin interstitial space while still maintaining a vacuum suspension. Distally, the pin lock has a 3-mm hole along its longitudinal axis that allows perspiration to be expelled into a distal reservoir. The prosthesis will also include: a standard aluminum pylon, pyramid adapters, and an Ossur Proflex XC prosthetic foot with Unity pump and foot cover.
Perforated elastomeric liner
The unique element of this perforated elastomeric liner are small perforations (\~0.3 mm diameter), uniformly distributed on a 4 x 5 mm grid, but with no perforations on the distal umbrella, that allow perspiration to be exuded into the liner-socket interstitial space. To use the perforated elastomeric liner, subjects will be fit with a modified patellar tendon-bearing socket that fits over a sock and the perforated elastomeric liner with a pin lock. The sock, worn between the socket and the liner, is used to absorb perspiration that is transported through the perforations in the liner. When needed for residual limb volume control, additional socks will be donned and included in tare weighing. The prosthesis will also include: a standard aluminum pylon, pyramid adapters, and an Ossur Proflex XC prosthetic foot and cosmesis.
As-prescribed prosthesis
The individual's as-prescribed suspension system is the prosthesis prescription that the patient and their clinical care team believes is the best prosthesis for their needs.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Been fit with a prosthesis and used it for at least six months
* Wear the prosthesis for four or more ours on an average day
* Ambulate without upper extremity aids
* Able to walk for 30 minutes on a treadmill
Exclusion Criteria
* Current skin irritation or injury on residual limb
* Osteoarthritis, injury, or pain that interferes with walking ability
* Currently incarcerated
* Pregnant (determined via self-report)
* Inadequate cognitive function or language proficiency to consent to participate
* High (\>20%) coronary heart disease risk at 10 years as determined by heir Framingham Risk Score
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Department of Defense
FED
Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Glenn Klute
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Glenn K Klute, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CDMRP-OR170314
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
W81XWH-18-1-0559
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.