Influence of Prosthetic Foot Stiffness on Transtibial Osseointegrated Bone-Anchored Limb Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT07263945

Last Updated: 2025-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-25

Study Completion Date

2030-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A clinical trial utilizing cross-over study design in which individuals with transtibial amputation using either a bone-anchored limb or standard socket prosthesis will perform activities of daily living with varying prosthetic foot stiffness categories to complete the following 4 Specific Aims: 1) Determine the influence of prosthetic foot stiffness on dynamic bone-implant loading, 2) Determine how prosthetic foot stiffness influences function, pain, and multi-joint biomechanics outcomes, 3) Establish how prosthetic foot stiffness influences osseoperception and fall risk, and 4) Establish target ranges of optimal foot stiffness based on the sensitivity biomechanical outcomes to variability in foot stiffness.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This will be a clinical trial with two groups (individuals with a unilateral transtibial amputation using either an osseointegrated bone-anchored limb or socket prosthesis that will implement a cross-over design. The objective of this clinical trial is to determine how changes in prosthetic foot stiffness influence clinical and biomechanical outcomes in patients with transtibial osseointegrated bone-anchored limbs compared to patients with transtibial amputation using a standard socket-suspended prosthesis. Although proper loading between the bone and implant is pivotal to promote and maintain osseointegration, which is required for physiological loading and thus positive outcomes, evidence surrounding the role of how prosthetic componentry influences force transmission and functional outcomes in this population currently does not exist. The findings of this clinical trial will address a critical knowledge gap pertaining to the role of componentry on multi-loading domain outcomes. Outcomes will be assessed in each participant in the same three conditions: one with their clinical prescribed prosthetic foot, one with a soft prosthetic foot (-2 stiffness categories less than prescribed), and one with a stiff prosthetic foot (+2 stiffness categories more than prescribed). This data will be used to test/develop the following aims: 1) Does foot stiffness change loading between the bone and implant during activities of daily living? 2) Does foot stiffness influence measures of function, pain, and biomechanics in patients with transtibial osseointegrated bone-anchored limbs differently than a socket prosthesis? 3) Does foot stiffness influence sensitivity, balance, and fall risk in patients using an osseointegrated bone-anchored limb different than a socket prosthesis? and 4) (exploratory) develop an optimization platform using computer models to determine the optimal foot stiffness that maximizes joint loading symmetry and minimizes metabolic cost.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amputation Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral Bone Anchored Devices Osseointegration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Two prosthetic foot stiffness categories stiffer than the as-prescribed prosthetic foot stiffness

A prosthetic foot that is two prosthetic foot stiffness categories stiffer than the stiffness of the as-prescribed prosthetic foot. The prosthetic foot type, including the manufacturer and length, will remain the same as the nominal (as-currently prescribed) foot.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

A prosthetic foot that is two prosthetic foot stiffness categories softer than the stiffness of the as-prescribed prosthetic foot

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each participant will complete a motion capture collection, tests of physical function, and sensory tests in a prosthetic foot that is two categories softer than their currently prescribed prosthetic foot.

Two prosthetic foot stiffness categories softer than the as-prescribed prosthetic foot stiffness

A prosthetic foot that is two prosthetic foot stiffness categories softer than the stiffness of the as-prescribed prosthetic foot. The prosthetic foot type, including the manufacturer and length, will remain the same as the nominal foot.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

A prosthetic foot that is two prosthetic foot stiffness categories stiffer than the stiffness of the as-prescribed prosthetic foot

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each participant will complete a motion capture collection, tests of physical function, and sensory tests in a prosthetic foot that is two categories stiffer than their currently prescribed prosthetic foot.

As-prescribed prosthetic foot stiffness

The prosthetic foot that is currently prescribed and used by each participant daily.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

As-prescribed prosthetic foot stiffness

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each participant will complete a motion capture collection, tests of physical function, and sensory tests in their currently prescribed prosthetic foot.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

As-prescribed prosthetic foot stiffness

Each participant will complete a motion capture collection, tests of physical function, and sensory tests in their currently prescribed prosthetic foot.

Intervention Type DEVICE

A prosthetic foot that is two prosthetic foot stiffness categories stiffer than the stiffness of the as-prescribed prosthetic foot

Each participant will complete a motion capture collection, tests of physical function, and sensory tests in a prosthetic foot that is two categories stiffer than their currently prescribed prosthetic foot.

Intervention Type DEVICE

A prosthetic foot that is two prosthetic foot stiffness categories softer than the stiffness of the as-prescribed prosthetic foot

Each participant will complete a motion capture collection, tests of physical function, and sensory tests in a prosthetic foot that is two categories softer than their currently prescribed prosthetic foot.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Unilateral transtibial amputation due to traumatic, congenital, or cancer-related causes
* \> 12-months bone-anchored limb implantation surgery (Bone Anchored Limb group)
* \> 12-months limb amputation (Socket Control group)
* Non-vascular amputation etiology
* Low profile prosthetic foot (nominal)
* Can walk unassisted for 5-minutes
* \> 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* Major amputation on contralateral limb
* Vascular amputation etiology
* Neurologic pathology that impairs coordination/balance
* Regular assistive device use required for community ambulation
* Inflammatory diseases or diabetes
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Brecca Gaffney, PhD

Role: CONTACT

303-315-7559

Eliza Biondi, MS

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Eliza Biondi, M.S

Role: primary

720-496-1934

Brecca Gaffney, PhD

Role: backup

303-315-7559

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01HD119003-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

25-0854

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Transfemoral Powered Foot and Physical Therapy Study
NCT03625921 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA