Study of an Orthotic Designed to Equalize Leg Lengths for Patients With Injuries Managed in Walking Boots
NCT ID: NCT03848949
Last Updated: 2021-06-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
107 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-16
2019-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biomechanical Analysis of CAM Boot and EVENUp Lift
NCT05365594
Even-Up to Minimize Secondary Site Pain For Ankle Fracture
NCT04164563
The Influence of Stability Boots on Gait Pattern in Healthy Adults
NCT03038815
The Safety of Reusing Walking Boot Components for Patients Recovering From Acute Foot and Ankle Injuries
NCT07287969
Comparing Active and Passive Ankle-foot Prostheses
NCT01684501
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
An orthotic has been designed that is added to the outside of a regular shoe in order to eliminate the effective leg length discrepancy between the booted extremity and the contralateral limb. Although this specific orthotic has not been studied, some proof of concept lies in studies that show that back pain can be managed with foot orthotics. The purpose of this study is to determine if using the leg-length-evening orthotic can improve balance and/or decrease the development of pain in the lower extremities and spine for patients who are WBAT in a CAM boot.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Subjects assigned to the control group receive the standard treatment for their condition, which must be at least 2 weeks of weight bearing as tolerated in a controlled ankle movement boot in order for them to meet inclusion criteria.
Subjects assigned to the experimental group receive the orthotic for use on the contralateral limb, which is the only alteration to their treatment of at least 2 weeks of weight bearing as tolerated in a controlled ankle movement boot (required to meet inclusion criteria).
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Orthotic Group
Subjects enrolled in the orthotic group receive the orthotic (Evenup) meant to increase the effective leg length of the uninjured limb.
Evenup
Orthotic which increases effective leg length.
Control
Subjects enrolled in the control group receive the standard treatment associated with their injury (no orthotic)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Evenup
Orthotic which increases effective leg length.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* being treated for an Achilles tendon rupture (and therefore being treated in a controlled ankle boot with heel lifts)
* member of a special population
18 Years
64 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rush University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kamran S Hamid, MD
Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeon
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kamran S Hamid, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rush University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
White R, Schuren J, Wardlaw D, Diamandopoulos Z, Anderson R. Biomechanical assessment of gait in below-knee walking casts. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1999 Aug;23(2):142-51. doi: 10.3109/03093649909071626.
Ferrari R. Effect of customized foot orthotics in addition to usual care for the management of chronic low back pain following work-related low back injury. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Jul-Aug;36(6):359-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
Cambron JA, Dexheimer JM, Duarte M, Freels S. Shoe Orthotics for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Sep;98(9):1752-1762. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.028. Epub 2017 Apr 30.
Ferrari R. Responsiveness of the short-form 36 and oswestry disability questionnaire in chronic nonspecific low back and lower limb pain treated with customized foot orthotics. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 Jul-Aug;30(6):456-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.016.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ORA: 18012208-IRB02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.