A Comparative Analysis Between College Park Sidekick Feet and Conventional Stubby Prosthesis
NCT ID: NCT02921295
Last Updated: 2018-06-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-09-30
2017-04-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Active and Passive Ankle-foot Prostheses
NCT01684501
Comparison of Thermo-plastic Versus Carbon Foot Ankle Orthosis to Improve Gait and Reduce Fatigue in Post-stroke Patients: a Biomechanical and Neurophysiological Study
NCT04323943
Identifying the Optimal Dynamic Ankle-Foot Orthosis Bending Stiffness for Individuals Post-Stroke
NCT06304519
Automatic Prosthetic Foot Stiffness Modulation to Improve Balance
NCT06711588
Understanding the Effects of Quantitatively-Prescribing Passive-Dynamic Ankle-Foot Orthosis Bending Stiffness for Individuals Post-Stroke
NCT04619043
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sidekick Stubbies
Conventional Stubby prostheses were used for baseline measures. In the sequential crossover design, articulated stubby prostheses ("Sidekick" manufactured by College Park Ind.) were used as intervention
Sidekick Stubbies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sidekick Stubbies
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* own a pair of conventional stubby prosthesis with standard adaptation
Exclusion Criteria
* use of prosthesis that do not allow change of feet with standard adapters
* any medical condition that may put an individual in greater risk of injury than normal daily activity.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
College Park Industries
UNKNOWN
Angela DeCandia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Angela DeCandia
Prosthetic & Orthotic Resident
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bakery Square MSPO labs
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PRO16050355
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.