Even-Up to Minimize Secondary Site Pain For Ankle Fracture
NCT ID: NCT04164563
Last Updated: 2022-10-18
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
6 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-14
2020-09-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of an Orthotic Designed to Equalize Leg Lengths for Patients With Injuries Managed in Walking Boots
NCT03848949
Biomechanical Assessment of Gait in Lower-Extremity-Amputees
NCT01332123
Biomechanical Analysis of CAM Boot and EVENUp Lift
NCT05365594
Outcome of Rehabilitation Following Internally Fixed Ankle Fractures
NCT02160197
Comparing Active and Passive Ankle-foot Prostheses
NCT01684501
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
We have previously conducted a study that suggests a relationship exists between CAM walker boot treatment and pain at sites other than the extremity being treated. There have been several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining a relationship between the correction of inherent LLD with insole inserts and lower back pain. Furthermore, there has been a past RCT and there is a current RCT examining a relationship between the use of the EVENup orthotic shoe lift to correct CAM walker boot simulated LLD and pain at sites other than the extremity being treated. However, these studies were not conducted with patient populations with uniform injuries. To the best of our knowledge, an RCT has not been conducted with the EVENup orthotic shoe lift to examine this relationship in a uniform patient population with nonoperative ankle fractures. This RCT aims to assess the efficacy of the EVENup orthotic shoe lift, towards reducing and even preventing such pain that may be associated with this common course of treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control
Standard CAM boot treatment without Even-Up device.
No interventions assigned to this group
Study
CAM boot treatment with Even-Up for contralateral extremity.
Even-Up
Orthotic shoe lift worn on contralateral foot to increase leg length
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Even-Up
Orthotic shoe lift worn on contralateral foot to increase leg length
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* CAM boot as treatment for injury
* Weight bearing ad lib
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-English speaking
* Recent surgery for lower extremity or back
* Recent other injury to lower extremity or back
* Restricted weight bearing
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeremy Smith
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeremy T Smith, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Waverly BJ, Sorensen MD, Sorensen TK. Early Weightbearing Protocol in Operative Fixation of Acute Jones Fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 May-Jun;57(3):489-493. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.11.005.
DiGiovanni BF, Moore AM, Zlotnicki JP, Pinney SJ. Preferred management of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis among orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons. Foot Ankle Int. 2012 Jun;33(6):507-12. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0507.
Mittal R, Harris IA, Adie S, Naylor JM; CROSSBAT Study Group. Surgery for Type B Ankle Fracture Treatment: a Combined Randomised and Observational Study (CROSSBAT). BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 27;7(3):e013298. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013298.
Simpson MR, Howard TM. Tendinopathies of the foot and ankle. Am Fam Physician. 2009 Nov 15;80(10):1107-14.
Vulcano E, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. Approach and treatment of the adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Dec;6(4):294-303. doi: 10.1007/s12178-013-9173-z.
Ready LV, Fisk EG, Ciurylo W, Chiodo CP, Bluman EM, Smith JT. Associated Joint Pain With Controlled Ankle Movement Walker Boot Wear. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Nov 27;2(12):e044. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00044. eCollection 2018 Dec.
Keene DJ, Willett K, Lamb SE. The Immediate Effects of Different Types of Ankle Support Introduced 6 Weeks After Surgical Internal Fixation for Ankle Fracture on Gait and Pain: A Randomized Crossover Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Mar;46(3):157-67. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6212. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
White SC, Gilchrist LA, Wilk BE. Asymmetric limb loading with true or simulated leg-length differences. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Apr;(421):287-92. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000119460.33630.6d.
O'Toole GC, Makwana NK, Lunn J, Harty J, Stephens MM. The effect of leg length discrepancy on foot loading patterns and contact times. Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Mar;24(3):256-9. doi: 10.1177/107110070302400310.
Subotnick SI. Limb length discrepancies of the lower extremity (the short leg syndrome). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1981;3(1):11-6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1981.3.1.11.
Rannisto S, Okuloff A, Uitti J, Paananen M, Rannisto PH, Malmivaara A, Karppinen J. Correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Mar 14;20(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2478-3.
Defrin R, Ben Benyamin S, Aldubi RD, Pick CG. Conservative correction of leg-length discrepancies of 10mm or less for the relief of chronic low back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Nov;86(11):2075-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.06.012.
Kipp D, Village D, Edwards KJ. Effectiveness of Evenup Shoe-Lift Use Among Individuals Prescribed a Walking Boot. J Allied Health. 2017 Summer;46(2):104-110.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Study of an Orthotic Designed to Equalize Leg Lengths for Patients with Injuries Managed in Walking Boots
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019P002694
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.