Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of an Orthotic Designed to Equalize Leg Lengths for Patients With Injuries Managed in Walking Boots (NCT NCT03848949)

NCT ID: NCT03848949

Last Updated: 2021-06-10

Results Overview

Patient reported assessment of their balance while wearing the controlled ankle movement boot on a scale of 1 - 10 (higher values indicate better balance).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

107 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

2 weeks

Results posted on

2021-06-10

Participant Flow

Enrollment continued until the study met protocol requirement.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Intervention Group
Patients who received the orthotic device
Control Group
Patients who did not receive the orthotic device.
Overall Study
STARTED
54
53
Overall Study
COMPLETED
49
46
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
5
7

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Intervention Group
Patients who received the orthotic device
Control Group
Patients who did not receive the orthotic device.
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
5
7

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Intervention
n=49 Participants
Patients who received the orthotic device.
Control
n=46 Participants
Patients who did not receive the orthotic device.
Total
n=95 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=49 Participants
48.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33 • n=46 Participants
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7 • n=95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants
n=49 Participants
28 Participants
n=46 Participants
60 Participants
n=95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants
n=49 Participants
18 Participants
n=46 Participants
35 Participants
n=95 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
United States
49 participants
n=49 Participants
46 participants
n=46 Participants
95 participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Malleolar fracture
9 Participants
n=49 Participants
10 Participants
n=46 Participants
19 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Foot fracture
9 Participants
n=49 Participants
8 Participants
n=46 Participants
17 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Ankle sprain
6 Participants
n=49 Participants
8 Participants
n=46 Participants
14 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Tibiotalar arthritis
8 Participants
n=49 Participants
1 Participants
n=46 Participants
9 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction
3 Participants
n=49 Participants
4 Participants
n=46 Participants
7 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Acute Achilles tendon rupture
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
4 Participants
n=46 Participants
4 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Hindfoot arthritis
2 Participants
n=49 Participants
1 Participants
n=46 Participants
3 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Midfoot arthritis
1 Participants
n=49 Participants
2 Participants
n=46 Participants
3 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Peroneal pathology
2 Participants
n=49 Participants
1 Participants
n=46 Participants
3 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Ankle Impingement
2 Participants
n=49 Participants
1 Participants
n=46 Participants
3 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Ankle instability
2 Participants
n=49 Participants
0 Participants
n=46 Participants
2 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Foot sprain
0 Participants
n=49 Participants
2 Participants
n=46 Participants
2 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Other
4 Participants
n=49 Participants
4 Participants
n=46 Participants
8 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition: malleolar fracture, foot fracture, ankle fracture, tibiotalar arthritis etc.
Plantar fasciitis
1 Participants
n=49 Participants
0 Participants
n=46 Participants
1 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition is tibiotalar or above
Condition at or proximal to tibiotalar joint
28 Participants
n=49 Participants
26 Participants
n=46 Participants
54 Participants
n=95 Participants
Condition is tibiotalar or above
Condition predominantly below or distal to tibiotalar joint
21 Participants
n=49 Participants
20 Participants
n=46 Participants
41 Participants
n=95 Participants
Postoperative versus nonoperative management
Postoperative
17 Participants
n=49 Participants
19 Participants
n=46 Participants
36 Participants
n=95 Participants
Postoperative versus nonoperative management
Nonoperative
32 Participants
n=49 Participants
27 Participants
n=46 Participants
59 Participants
n=95 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Patient reported assessment of their balance while wearing the controlled ankle movement boot on a scale of 1 - 10 (higher values indicate better balance).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Orthotic Group
n=49 Participants
Subjects enrolled in the orthotic group receive the orthotic (Evenup) meant to increase the effective leg length of the uninjured limb. Evenup: Orthotic which increases effective leg length.
Control
n=46 Participants
Subjects enrolled in the control group receive the standard treatment associated with their injury (no orthotic)
Patient Reported Balance
3.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7
2.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 weeks

Patient reported assessment of joint pain while wearing the controlled ankle movement boot on scales of 1 - 10 (higher values indicate more pain).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Orthotic Group
n=49 Participants
Subjects enrolled in the orthotic group receive the orthotic (Evenup) meant to increase the effective leg length of the uninjured limb. Evenup: Orthotic which increases effective leg length.
Control
n=46 Participants
Subjects enrolled in the control group receive the standard treatment associated with their injury (no orthotic)
Patient Reported Pain
4.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.1

Adverse Events

Orthotic Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Daniel D. Bohl

Rush University Medical Center

Phone: 414.640.7245

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place