Clinical Trial Comparing C-Brace to Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis (KAFO)/Stance Control Orthosis (SCO)
NCT ID: NCT03906656
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
149 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-11
2022-08-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
C-BRACE Versus SCO in Community Ambulators
NCT05332509
Comparing Functional Outcomes in Individuals Using Micro-processor Controlled Orthosis Versus Stance Control Orthosis
NCT02089880
Evaluation of the Effect of an Ankle Foot Orthoses for Ambulatory Function
NCT01336517
Ankle Foot Orthosis Comparative Effect
NCT03901053
the Effect of the CALIGALOC Orthosis on Standing and Walking of Hemiparetic Patients With Ankle Varus
NCT03668561
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
KAFO/SCO
Home use of 3 months with existing knee ankle foot orthosis (KAFO) or existing stance control orthosis (SCO)
KAFO/SCO
Current knee ankle foot orthosis that the subject was wearing at baseline
C-Brace
Home use of 3 months with newly fitted C-Brace microprocessor-controlled stance and swing control orthosis.
C-Brace
The C-Brace consists of individually fabricated thigh, calf and foot components. An ankle joint, unilateral or bilateral fitting, or an individual spring element connects the foot and calf components. The sensor system continuously measures the flexion of the knee joint and its angular acceleration. This allows the C-Brace to detect the user's current walking phase, so it can regulate the hydraulic resistances as well as control the flexion and extension of the knee joint.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
C-Brace
The C-Brace consists of individually fabricated thigh, calf and foot components. An ankle joint, unilateral or bilateral fitting, or an individual spring element connects the foot and calf components. The sensor system continuously measures the flexion of the knee joint and its angular acceleration. This allows the C-Brace to detect the user's current walking phase, so it can regulate the hydraulic resistances as well as control the flexion and extension of the knee joint.
KAFO/SCO
Current knee ankle foot orthosis that the subject was wearing at baseline
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient has a BBS score \< 45
* Lower limb functional impairment according to CE label wording
* Prior active and compliant use of unilateral or bilateral KAFO or SCO in the past 3 months prior to enrollment in the study
* Patient meets minimum physical requirements to be fitted with a C-Brace, such as muscle status, joint mobility, leg axis and proper control of the orthosis must be guaranteed.
* The User must fulfill the physical and mental requirements for perceiving optical/acoustic signals and/or mechanical vibrations
* The existing muscle strength of the hip extensors and flexors must permit the controlled swing-through of the limb (compensation using the hip is possible).
* Patient´s commitment to use C-Brace 2 at least 1-2 hours per day 5 days per week-
* Patient is ≥ 18 years old
* Patient is willing and able to independently provide informed consent.
* Person is willing to comply with study procedures
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient was not able to use DTO
* Patient who is not using an orthosis at least 1 to 2 hours/ day for 5 days per week
* Patient with body weight \> 125 kg (includes body weight and heaviest object (weight) carried)
* Patient with Orthoprosthesis
* Patient with flexion contracture in the knee and/or hip joint in excess of 10°
* Patient with uncontrolled moderate to severe spasticity (relative contraindication moderate spasticity)
* Leg length discrepancy in excess of 15 cm
* Patient with unstable neurological or cardiovascular/pulmonary disease, cancer
* Pregnancy
* Patient using a C-Brace
* Patient with known vertigo or with history of falls unrelated to orthosis use or unrelated to motor disability
* Patient who has never been fitted an orthosis before
* Patient is not able to answer the self-administered questionnaires independently; for patients with upper extremity impairment is it allowed to verbally answer the questions.
* Patient participating already in a study during this study´s duration
* Patient participated in earlier C-Brace studies
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frank Braatz, Dr. med.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Zentrum für Healthcare Technology der Privaten Hochschule Göttingen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hanger Clinic
Sarasota, Florida, United States
Scheck & Siress
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Hanger Clinic
Houston, Texas, United States
Hanger Clinic
Seattle, Washington, United States
Orthopädisches Spital Speising Speisingerstraße 109
Vienna, , Austria
BeMoveD - Berlin Movement Diagnostics
Berlin, Deutschland, Germany
Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz-Montabaur
Koblenz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Johannesbad Raupennest GmbH & Co. KG
Altenberg, , Germany
Zentrum für Healthcare Technology der Privaten Hochschule Göttingen
Göttingen, , Germany
BG Klinikum Hamburg gGmbH Zentrum für Rehabilitationsmedizin
Hamburg, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Zentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Paraplegiologie
Heidelberg, , Germany
Pohlig GmbH
Traunstein, , Germany
Adelante Kenniscentrum
Hoensbroek, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PS00120016A-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.