Comparing Functional Outcomes in Individuals Using Micro-processor Controlled Orthosis Versus Stance Control Orthosis
NCT ID: NCT02089880
Last Updated: 2025-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-02-28
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the NEUROSWING Orthosis on Walking Speed in a Population With Dorsal and/or Plantar Flexor Deficits, With a View to a Reimbursement Application
NCT07108088
C-BRACE Versus SCO in Community Ambulators
NCT05332509
Clinical Trial Comparing C-Brace to Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis (KAFO)/Stance Control Orthosis (SCO)
NCT03906656
Evaluation of the Effect of an Ankle Foot Orthoses for Ambulatory Function
NCT01336517
Microprocessor Knees in Early Rehabilitation
NCT03433300
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
C-brace then stance control orthosis
C-brace
The participant will receive 6 sessions of training over a one month period in using the C-brace in all levels of functional gait. The participant will then continue use of the C-brace for one month following training. The C-Brace from Otto Bock is an orthosis that controls throughout stance and swing phases of gait with a micro-processor (MP) controlled knee.
Stance control orthosis
The participant will receive 6 sessions of training over a one month period in using his current stance control knee-ankle-foot orthosis (SCO) in all levels of functional gait. The participant will then continue use of the SCO for one month following training. The SCO controls the knee by maintaining it straight and extended during the stance phase of gait.
Stance control orthosis then C-brace
C-brace
The participant will receive 6 sessions of training over a one month period in using the C-brace in all levels of functional gait. The participant will then continue use of the C-brace for one month following training. The C-Brace from Otto Bock is an orthosis that controls throughout stance and swing phases of gait with a micro-processor (MP) controlled knee.
Stance control orthosis
The participant will receive 6 sessions of training over a one month period in using his current stance control knee-ankle-foot orthosis (SCO) in all levels of functional gait. The participant will then continue use of the SCO for one month following training. The SCO controls the knee by maintaining it straight and extended during the stance phase of gait.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
C-brace
The participant will receive 6 sessions of training over a one month period in using the C-brace in all levels of functional gait. The participant will then continue use of the C-brace for one month following training. The C-Brace from Otto Bock is an orthosis that controls throughout stance and swing phases of gait with a micro-processor (MP) controlled knee.
Stance control orthosis
The participant will receive 6 sessions of training over a one month period in using his current stance control knee-ankle-foot orthosis (SCO) in all levels of functional gait. The participant will then continue use of the SCO for one month following training. The SCO controls the knee by maintaining it straight and extended during the stance phase of gait.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Prior active and compliant use of unilateral Knee-ankle-foot orthosis (KAFO) or Stance control orthosis (SCO).
* Age 18 - 80 years.
* Demonstrate a reciprocal gait pattern using the SCO and C-Brace trial tools.
* Cognitive ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.
* Subjects must be able to demonstrate the ability to turn the global positioning sensor (GPS) and Actigraph units on and off and sufficient memory ability to wear the devices each day during use of the orthoses.
Exclusion Criteria
* Body weight \>275 pounds.
* Unstable neurological or cardiovascular/pulmonary disease, cancer.
* Knee flexion contracture resulting in the inability to actively use C-Brace or SCO.
* Participating in physical therapy currently or within 1 month of starting protocol, specific to orthotic use and gait training.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH
INDUSTRY
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arun Jayaraman, PT, PhD
Research Scientist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Deems-Dluhy S, Hoppe-Ludwig S, Mummidisetty CK, Semik P, Heinemann AW, Jayaraman A. Microprocessor Controlled Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis (KAFO) vs Stance Control vs Locked KAFO: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Feb;102(2):233-244. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
85951
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.