Comparison of Three Modalities to Assess Clinical Competence of Medical Students
NCT ID: NCT03884114
Last Updated: 2020-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-20
2019-07-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Its objective is to determine which of the simulation game or the MCQ reflects the best the clinical competence of medical students evaluated on a HF simulator.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Serious Game Versus Online Course to Pre-train Medical Students on the Management of an Adult Cardiac Arrest.
NCT02758119
Validity Assessment of the "LabForGames Warning" Serious Game
NCT03092440
Instructor-led Simulation Training Versus Self-directed Simulator Training During Simulated Neonatal Resuscitation
NCT01875900
Simulation Based Learning and Academic Performance in Medical School
NCT04864756
Virtual Clinical Simulation for Training Amongst Undergraduate Medical Students: A Pilot Randomised Trial
NCT03976388
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Simulation games may represent an interesting compromise between the cheap but limited assessment allowed by MCQs, and the comprehensive but highly expensive assessment allowed by OSCE and HF simulation.
This study, focusing on the management of pediatric asthma exacerbations, assesses the clinical skills of medical students using three different evaluation tools: (i) the simulation game "Effic'Asthme" developed to train individuals on the management of pediatric asthma exacerbations; (ii) a MCQ on the same subject developed for the purpose of the study and (iii) HF-simulation, considered as the gold-standard for its enhanced realism.
Its objective is to determine which of the simulation game or the MCQ reflects the best the clinical competence of medical students evaluated on a HF simulator.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
SEQUENTIAL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
All participants
All participants are evaluated on a scenario of pediatric asthma exacerbation using three different evaluation tools: (i) the simulation game EfficAsthme developed to train individuals on the management of pediatric asthma exacerbations; (ii) a MCQ on the same subject developed for the purpose of the study and (iii) HF-simulation, considered as the gold-standard for its enhanced realism.
High-fidelity simulation
The first evaluation modality studied is high fidelity (HF) simulation. In our study, this modality is considered to be the gold-standard assessment method of clinical assessment, because HF simulation corresponds to the modality which reflects the best clinical competence in hospital settings. The HF pediatric manikin used (SimBaby), is able to reproduce all the signs of an asthma exacerbation (coughing, wheezing, tachypnea, chest indrawing, seesaw respiration, cyanosis). In the simulation room, participants can use the same items that those present in the simulation game (a glass of water, paracetamol, short acting beta-agonist, controller treatment (Fluticasone), an asthma spacer with a facial mask, saline nose drops to perform nasal irrigation, oral steroids in tablets (prednisone), and a phone).
Simulation game
EfficAsthme is a simulation game used on a tablet computer. This simulation game was developed to train parents on the management of asthma exacerbations of their children. For the purpose of the study, EfficAsthme is diverted from its original use to assess students' clinical skills. The training scenario "A polluted atmosphere" is used in this study. Participants need to observe the signs presented by the child, and to determine the severity of the asthma exacerbation. From a menu on the right of the screen, the participant can choose several actions, especially to provide the short acting beta-agonist.
Multiple choice questionnaire
The third evaluation modality corresponds to a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) including 15 questions. As for HF-simulation and the simulation game, the MCQ starts with the same briefing and continues with 15 questions regarding the management of a moderate asthma exacerbation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
High-fidelity simulation
The first evaluation modality studied is high fidelity (HF) simulation. In our study, this modality is considered to be the gold-standard assessment method of clinical assessment, because HF simulation corresponds to the modality which reflects the best clinical competence in hospital settings. The HF pediatric manikin used (SimBaby), is able to reproduce all the signs of an asthma exacerbation (coughing, wheezing, tachypnea, chest indrawing, seesaw respiration, cyanosis). In the simulation room, participants can use the same items that those present in the simulation game (a glass of water, paracetamol, short acting beta-agonist, controller treatment (Fluticasone), an asthma spacer with a facial mask, saline nose drops to perform nasal irrigation, oral steroids in tablets (prednisone), and a phone).
Simulation game
EfficAsthme is a simulation game used on a tablet computer. This simulation game was developed to train parents on the management of asthma exacerbations of their children. For the purpose of the study, EfficAsthme is diverted from its original use to assess students' clinical skills. The training scenario "A polluted atmosphere" is used in this study. Participants need to observe the signs presented by the child, and to determine the severity of the asthma exacerbation. From a menu on the right of the screen, the participant can choose several actions, especially to provide the short acting beta-agonist.
Multiple choice questionnaire
The third evaluation modality corresponds to a multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ) including 15 questions. As for HF-simulation and the simulation game, the MCQ starts with the same briefing and continues with 15 questions regarding the management of a moderate asthma exacerbation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Being in their fifth year of medical school
* Having passed their pediatric exam in the previous 15 days
* Willing to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ilumens
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Drummond, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Université Paris Descartes
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Université Paris Descartes
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Norcini JJ, Swanson DB, Grosso LJ, Webster GD. Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence. Med Educ. 1985 May;19(3):238-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1985.tb01314.x.
Drummond D, Delval P, Abdenouri S, Truchot J, Ceccaldi PF, Plaisance P, Hadchouel A, Tesniere A. Serious game versus online course for pretraining medical students before a simulation-based mastery learning course on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomised controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec;34(12):836-844. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000675.
Adjedj J, Ducrocq G, Bouleti C, Reinhart L, Fabbro E, Elbez Y, Fischer Q, Tesniere A, Feldman L, Varenne O. Medical Student Evaluation With a Serious Game Compared to Multiple Choice Questions Assessment. JMIR Serious Games. 2017 May 16;5(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/games.7033.
Fonteneau T, Billion E, Abdoul C, Le S, Hadchouel A, Drummond D. Simulation Game Versus Multiple Choice Questionnaire to Assess the Clinical Competence of Medical Students: Prospective Sequential Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 16;22(12):e23254. doi: 10.2196/23254.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Site showing the simulation game "EfficAsthme" developed
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ilumens0003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.