Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Surgeries Anaesthetized With Propofol and Inhalational Anaesthetics

NCT ID: NCT03875872

Last Updated: 2023-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

3922 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-11

Study Completion Date

2019-08-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Propofol used as anaesthesia in surgery had shown small postoperative analgesic benefits over inhalational anaesthetics in some meta-analyses. It was also associated with reduced risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Small sample of studies together with high heterogeneity prevented some meta-analyses to confirm propofol's effect for postoperative morphine consumption and other outcomes. Acute Pain Service data bank can provide an alternative way of evaluating postoperative outcomes of propofol anaesthetics through supplying a very large sample size in a more homogeneous setting. Retrospective study comparing propofol and inhalational anaesthetics on postoperative pain matched on patients' demographic and clinical data had been done for liver surgery. Propofol's benefits for postoperative pain and morphine consumption was confirmed but not for adverse effects.

This study plans to analyze the postoperative outcome data from an Acute Pain Service data bank in years 2015-17 to compare the anaesthetics of propofol and inhalational anaesthetics. Comprehensive regression adjustment for confounders are performed using all available patients' demographic, clinical and anaesthetic data. All major surgery types are included. Results will provide postoperative outcome differences between propofol and inhalational anaesthetics for all surgeries and for specific type of surgeries. The large sample bank will provide higher probability for detecting outcome difference between the anaesthetics for all the major surgical types.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: To compare the postoperative outcomes between surgeries anaesthetized with propofol and inhalational anaesthetics in the Acute Pain Service records of Queen Mary Hospital for years 2015-17

Methods:

Retrospective

Data collection

1. Demographic data;
2. Type of surgery;
3. Type of anaesthetic techniques;
4. Postoperative NRS pain scores (Rest and Moving) for Postop Days 1, 2 \& 3;
5. Accumulated amount of patient controlled analgesia (PCA) used in Postop Days 1, 2 \& 3;
6. Postoperative incidence of nausea, vomitting, dizziness and pruritus.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group propofol

Patients who had surgeries and were anaesthetized with propofol at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017

Propofol

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients who had surgeries and were anaesthetized with propofol at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017

Group inhalation anaesthetics

Patients who had surgeries and were anaesthetized via inhalation at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017

inhalation anaesthetics

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients who had surgeries and were anaesthetized via inhalation at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Propofol

Patients who had surgeries and were anaesthetized with propofol at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017

Intervention Type DRUG

inhalation anaesthetics

Patients who had surgeries and were anaesthetized via inhalation at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from Jan 2015 to Dec 2017

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Postoperative outcomes from Acute Pain Service data bank between Jan 2015 and Dec 2017 in Queen Mary Hospital would be retrieved;
2. Surgeries with general anaesthesia by either propofol or inhalational anaesthetics.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Essential data missed;
2. Surgical types with small sample size below 30 for the data collection period.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wong Sau Ching Stanley

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stanley SC Wong, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Qiu Q, Choi SW, Wong SS, Irwin MG, Cheung CW. Effects of intra-operative maintenance of general anaesthesia with propofol on postoperative pain outcomes - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2016 Oct;71(10):1222-33. doi: 10.1111/anae.13578. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27506326 (View on PubMed)

Peng K, Liu HY, Wu SR, Liu H, Zhang ZC, Ji FH. Does Propofol Anesthesia Lead to Less Postoperative Pain Compared With Inhalational Anesthesia?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):846-58. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001504.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27636574 (View on PubMed)

Kumar G, Stendall C, Mistry R, Gurusamy K, Walker D. A comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol with sevoflurane or desflurane in ambulatory surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2014 Oct;69(10):1138-50. doi: 10.1111/anae.12713. Epub 2014 May 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24847783 (View on PubMed)

Chan AC, Qiu Q, Choi SW, Wong SS, Chan AC, Irwin MG, Cheung CW. Effects of Intra-Operative Total Intravenous Anaesthesia with Propofol versus Inhalational Anaesthesia with Sevoflurane on Post-Operative Pain in Liver Surgery: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149753. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26901037 (View on PubMed)

Wong SSC, Choi EKY, Chan WS, Cheung CW. Propofol total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for acute postoperative pain in patients with morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a large-scale retrospective study with covariate adjustment. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 10;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01683-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35538421 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UW19-182

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.