Single Site Versus Multi Site Robotic Hysterectomy

NCT ID: NCT03662451

Last Updated: 2024-10-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-15

Study Completion Date

2026-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Robotic single site surgery (R-SSH) is a novel technique, which may be superior to multi site hysterectomy (R-MSH) in select patients regarding cosmesis and postoperative pain. A randomized trial is performed to compare R-SSH with R-MSH with regard to the postoperative rehabilitation, cosmesis, the operational cost, and the perioperative morbidity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is scheduled to start November 2018 and compares robotic single site to multi site hysterectomy. Procedures are performed on two locations, Herning and Herlev Hospitals, by experienced surgeons. Patients are randomized to either R-SSH (No.=62) or R-MSH (No.=62). Patient's satisfaction with body image and cosmesis is assessed at different time points pre- and postoperatively by means of validated cosmesis scales and Body Image Questionnaire and photo-evaluations.

Postoperative pain and split times spent at the operation theatre will be registered as secondary outcome parameters.

A follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 month include evaluation of the scar and registration of port-site hernias and vaginal dehiscence or other complications. Interviews and diaries will include time of return to home and work, daily activities including sexuality The R-SSH is performed using da Vinci, Xi robotic system. One single port, diameter 2 cm is applied. Applying an additional assistant port is defined conversion of procedure R-MSH is performed using standard equipment and 4 trocars, 5 mm each.

Sample size calculation was based a previous study on fast track hysterectomy, which showed a difference in return to work of 4 days. 62 women in each group is needed with standard deviation ±8 and a power of 80%. To include those not working, the calculation was performed with an expected visual analog pain score of 0.86 ±0.2 and 62 in each group and suggested that the sample was sufficient to detect of difference of 0.1 in visual analog pain score with a power of 80%. All calculation are based on two-sided testing with alpha of 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rehabilitation Pain, Postoperative Wound Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Women are randomized to either robotic single site or multi site hysterectomy
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robotic single-site hysterectomy

Robotic single-site hysterectomy is performed in this arm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Robotic assisted hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Periumbilical single incision vs multiple abdominal incisions for hysterectomy

Robotic multi-site hysterectomy

Robotic multi-site hysterectomy is performed in this arm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Robotic assisted hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Periumbilical single incision vs multiple abdominal incisions for hysterectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic assisted hysterectomy

Periumbilical single incision vs multiple abdominal incisions for hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hysterectomy on benign indication,
* American Society of Anesthetists group 1 or 2,
* BMI less than 30 kg/m2
* uterine size less than 300 g estimated by ultrasound, using Ferraris formula.

Exclusion Criteria

* adhesions
* prior extensive abdominal surgery
* prior midline incision
* cutis laxa of abdomen surgery
* endometriosis
* more than 1 cesarean section
* malignant disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Herlev Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Herning Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Finn Lauszus

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Finn F Lauszus, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Herning Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Gynecology Dept. Herning Hospital

Herning, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

El Hachem L, Andikyan V, Mathews S, Friedman K, Poeran J, Shieh K, Geoghegan M, Gretz HF 3rd. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26992935 (View on PubMed)

Golkar FC, Ross SB, Sperry S, Vice M, Luberice K, Donn N, Morton C, Hernandez JM, Rosemurgy AS. Patients' perceptions of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the cosmetic effect. Am J Surg. 2012 Nov;204(5):751-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.026.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23140831 (View on PubMed)

Sandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, van den Tweel MM, Schoones JW, Jansen FW. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28357561 (View on PubMed)

Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, Sobolewski C. Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23312246 (View on PubMed)

Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26264829 (View on PubMed)

Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty. 2010 Jun 21;10:e43.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20596233 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Single site robot study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LESS-TLH Versus LESS-LAVH
NCT01861067 COMPLETED PHASE3