Comparison of Three Robotic Platforms for Hysterectomy

NCT ID: NCT06138197

Last Updated: 2025-03-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-04

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hysterectomy is the most common procedure in gynaecology after a cesarean section. In recent years, the laparoscopic approach has become preferred given the different advantages over the traditional laparotomic approach, and both conventional laparoscopy and robotic-assisted laparoscopy have become the standard approach for hysterectomy. To date, robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy has been performed using one robotic platform and only recently, two new robotic platforms have been introduced in clinical practice. Although all three are registered for human use and available for clinical practice, there are currently not enough clinical experiences and data in the literature to evaluate the efficacy, safety and relationship between cost and efficacy of the new platforms available for the robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. For this reason, the investigators will conduct an exploratory clinical study on a Post Market Clinical Follow up (PMCF) medical device aimed at performing a preliminary assessment of the global performance of the ITL procedure implemented using the three robotic platforms currently available.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hysterectomy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy by da Vinci X surgical system, model IS4200 (INTUITIVE)

Women who undergo robotic-assisted hysterectomy by da Vinci X surgical system, model IS4200 (INTUITIVE)

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy following usual surgical technique

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy by VERSIUS ® surgical system (ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM)

Women who undergo robotic-assisted hysterectomy by VERSIUS ® surgical system (ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM)

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy following usual surgical technique

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy by HUGO ™ Robotic Assisted Surgery System (RAS) (MEDTRONIC)

Women who undergo robotic-assisted hysterectomy by HUGO ™ Robotic Assisted Surgery System (RAS) (MEDTRONIC)

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy following usual surgical technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy

Robotic-assisted hysterectomy following usual surgical technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy surgery
* Age \> 18 years
* Signature of the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing emergency surgery
* Patients who are candidates for hysterectomy for a non-gynaecological indication
* Patients undergoing previous radiation therapy
* Patients unable to express adequate informed consent to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universita di Verona

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stefano Uccella

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefano Uccella, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universita di Verona

Simone Garzon, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universita di Verona

Pier Carlo Zorzato, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universita di Verona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AOUI Verona - University of Verona - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Verona, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Torpy JM, Lynm C, Glass RM. JAMA patient page. Hysterectomy. JAMA. 2004 Mar 24;291(12):1526. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.12.1526. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15039420 (View on PubMed)

Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26264829 (View on PubMed)

Lawrie TA, Liu H, Lu D, Dowswell T, Song H, Wang L, Shi G. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 15;4(4):CD011422. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011422.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30985921 (View on PubMed)

Nobbenhuis MAE, Gul N, Barton-Smith P, O'Sullivan O, Moss E, Ind TEJ; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Robotic surgery in gynaecology: Scientific Impact Paper No. 71 (July 2022). BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17242. Epub 2022 Jul 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35844092 (View on PubMed)

Monterossi G, Pedone Anchora L, Gueli Alletti S, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Scambia G. The first European gynaecological procedure with the new surgical robot Hugo RAS. A total hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy in a woman affected by BRCA-1 mutation. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022 Mar;14(1):91-94. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.14.1.014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35373554 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COMPAR-HYST

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.