Tissue Removal During Hysterectomy: The Effect of Vaginal Versus Abdominal Morcellation on Surgical Outcomes
NCT ID: NCT02703246
Last Updated: 2023-06-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2023-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcomes on Abdominal Versus Vaginal Morcellation At Time of Hysterectomy
NCT04434066
Study of Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at a Teaching Institution
NCT01581905
Perioperative Outcomes of Common Methods of Minimally Invasive Contained Tissue Extraction
NCT02496130
Efficacy of In-bag Morcellation
NCT03281460
Comparison of Laparoscopic to Vaginal Surgical Repair for Uterine Prolapse
NCT01594372
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Morcellation is a technique that allows large pieces of tissue to be removed through small incisions and was originally performed either with a scalpel or manual device until the first power/electric morcellators were introduced in 1993. Since then, power morcellation has made 50,000 to 150,000 minimally invasive hysterectomies possible annually. While the former has been an integral part in the treatment of women with large uteri and uterine fibroids, it has recently come under scrutiny due to multiple concerns including dissemination of undetected malignancy, development of iatrogenic myomas as well as increased number of reported complications and death. This has led the US Food and drug administration in April 2014 to issue a statement discouraging the use of laparoscopic power morcellation.
In the face of the growing bias against electronic mechanical morcellators, other approaches must be investigated and promulgated so that patients may still benefit from minimally invasive gynecologic surgeries. The two commonly used methods for tissue extraction are manual morcellation through mini-laparotomy and vaginal morcellation. In the former, a trocar site enlargement or a new up to 1 inch incision is created through which the specimen is brought to the abdominal surface and morcellated with scalpel.In the latter, tissues are removed in the same fashion but via a colpotomy. The investigators intent is to compare manual morcellation methods (vaginal vs abdominal mini-laparotomy) in order to help surgeons choose the best approach for their patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
abdominal morcellation
Women randomized to this group will undergo abdominal morcellation.
abdominal morcellation
patients will be randomized to receive abdominal morcellation
vaginal morcellation
Women randomized to this group will undergo vaginal morcellation.
vaginal morcellation
patients will be randomized to receive vaginal morcellation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
abdominal morcellation
patients will be randomized to receive abdominal morcellation
vaginal morcellation
patients will be randomized to receive vaginal morcellation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient is scheduled to have surgery with one of the minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons at George Washington University Hospital. (Dr. Moawad, Dr. Marfori, or Dr. Vargas)
* Patient is planned for a robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RA-TLH) or a total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH)
* Patient is capable of informed consent
* Patient must be between 18 and 65 years of age
* Uterus greater than 12 centimeters in height and 4 centimeters in width or 12 weeks in size
Exclusion Criteria
* Procedure is anything other than RA-TLH or TLH
* Surgeon is not one of hte minimally invasive surgeons at GWUH
* Surgery is scheduled for a hospital other than GWUH
* Patient does not meet the age requirements.
* Patient is not capable of informed consent
* Uterus is less than 12 cm in heightand 4 cm in width
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
George Washington University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gaby Moawad, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
091553
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.